Cargando…

Systematic Comparison of High-throughput Single-Cell and Single-Nucleus Transcriptomes during Cardiomyocyte Differentiation

A comprehensive reference map of all cell types in the human body is necessary for improving our understanding of fundamental biological processes and in diagnosing and treating disease. High-throughput single-cell RNA sequencing techniques have emerged as powerful tools to identify and characterize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selewa, Alan, Dohn, Ryan, Eckart, Heather, Lozano, Stephanie, Xie, Bingqing, Gauchat, Eric, Elorbany, Reem, Rhodes, Katherine, Burnett, Jonathan, Gilad, Yoav, Pott, Sebastian, Basu, Anindita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6992778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32001747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58327-6
_version_ 1783492904783708160
author Selewa, Alan
Dohn, Ryan
Eckart, Heather
Lozano, Stephanie
Xie, Bingqing
Gauchat, Eric
Elorbany, Reem
Rhodes, Katherine
Burnett, Jonathan
Gilad, Yoav
Pott, Sebastian
Basu, Anindita
author_facet Selewa, Alan
Dohn, Ryan
Eckart, Heather
Lozano, Stephanie
Xie, Bingqing
Gauchat, Eric
Elorbany, Reem
Rhodes, Katherine
Burnett, Jonathan
Gilad, Yoav
Pott, Sebastian
Basu, Anindita
author_sort Selewa, Alan
collection PubMed
description A comprehensive reference map of all cell types in the human body is necessary for improving our understanding of fundamental biological processes and in diagnosing and treating disease. High-throughput single-cell RNA sequencing techniques have emerged as powerful tools to identify and characterize cell types in complex and heterogeneous tissues. However, extracting intact cells from tissues and organs is often technically challenging or impossible, for example in heart or brain tissue. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing provides an alternative way to obtain transcriptome profiles of such tissues. To systematically assess the differences between high-throughput single-cell and single-nuclei RNA-seq approaches, we compared Drop-seq and DroNc-seq, two microfluidic-based 3′ RNA capture technologies that profile total cellular and nuclear RNA, respectively, during a time course experiment of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) differentiating into cardiomyocytes. Clustering of time-series transcriptomes from Drop-seq and DroNc-seq revealed six distinct cell types, five of which were found in both techniques. Furthermore, single-cell trajectories reconstructed from both techniques reproduced expected differentiation dynamics. We then applied DroNc-seq to postmortem heart tissue to test its performance on heterogeneous human tissue samples. Our data confirm that DroNc-seq yields similar results to Drop-seq on matched samples and can be successfully used to generate reference maps for the human cell atlas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6992778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69927782020-02-05 Systematic Comparison of High-throughput Single-Cell and Single-Nucleus Transcriptomes during Cardiomyocyte Differentiation Selewa, Alan Dohn, Ryan Eckart, Heather Lozano, Stephanie Xie, Bingqing Gauchat, Eric Elorbany, Reem Rhodes, Katherine Burnett, Jonathan Gilad, Yoav Pott, Sebastian Basu, Anindita Sci Rep Article A comprehensive reference map of all cell types in the human body is necessary for improving our understanding of fundamental biological processes and in diagnosing and treating disease. High-throughput single-cell RNA sequencing techniques have emerged as powerful tools to identify and characterize cell types in complex and heterogeneous tissues. However, extracting intact cells from tissues and organs is often technically challenging or impossible, for example in heart or brain tissue. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing provides an alternative way to obtain transcriptome profiles of such tissues. To systematically assess the differences between high-throughput single-cell and single-nuclei RNA-seq approaches, we compared Drop-seq and DroNc-seq, two microfluidic-based 3′ RNA capture technologies that profile total cellular and nuclear RNA, respectively, during a time course experiment of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) differentiating into cardiomyocytes. Clustering of time-series transcriptomes from Drop-seq and DroNc-seq revealed six distinct cell types, five of which were found in both techniques. Furthermore, single-cell trajectories reconstructed from both techniques reproduced expected differentiation dynamics. We then applied DroNc-seq to postmortem heart tissue to test its performance on heterogeneous human tissue samples. Our data confirm that DroNc-seq yields similar results to Drop-seq on matched samples and can be successfully used to generate reference maps for the human cell atlas. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6992778/ /pubmed/32001747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58327-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Selewa, Alan
Dohn, Ryan
Eckart, Heather
Lozano, Stephanie
Xie, Bingqing
Gauchat, Eric
Elorbany, Reem
Rhodes, Katherine
Burnett, Jonathan
Gilad, Yoav
Pott, Sebastian
Basu, Anindita
Systematic Comparison of High-throughput Single-Cell and Single-Nucleus Transcriptomes during Cardiomyocyte Differentiation
title Systematic Comparison of High-throughput Single-Cell and Single-Nucleus Transcriptomes during Cardiomyocyte Differentiation
title_full Systematic Comparison of High-throughput Single-Cell and Single-Nucleus Transcriptomes during Cardiomyocyte Differentiation
title_fullStr Systematic Comparison of High-throughput Single-Cell and Single-Nucleus Transcriptomes during Cardiomyocyte Differentiation
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Comparison of High-throughput Single-Cell and Single-Nucleus Transcriptomes during Cardiomyocyte Differentiation
title_short Systematic Comparison of High-throughput Single-Cell and Single-Nucleus Transcriptomes during Cardiomyocyte Differentiation
title_sort systematic comparison of high-throughput single-cell and single-nucleus transcriptomes during cardiomyocyte differentiation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6992778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32001747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58327-6
work_keys_str_mv AT selewaalan systematiccomparisonofhighthroughputsinglecellandsinglenucleustranscriptomesduringcardiomyocytedifferentiation
AT dohnryan systematiccomparisonofhighthroughputsinglecellandsinglenucleustranscriptomesduringcardiomyocytedifferentiation
AT eckartheather systematiccomparisonofhighthroughputsinglecellandsinglenucleustranscriptomesduringcardiomyocytedifferentiation
AT lozanostephanie systematiccomparisonofhighthroughputsinglecellandsinglenucleustranscriptomesduringcardiomyocytedifferentiation
AT xiebingqing systematiccomparisonofhighthroughputsinglecellandsinglenucleustranscriptomesduringcardiomyocytedifferentiation
AT gauchateric systematiccomparisonofhighthroughputsinglecellandsinglenucleustranscriptomesduringcardiomyocytedifferentiation
AT elorbanyreem systematiccomparisonofhighthroughputsinglecellandsinglenucleustranscriptomesduringcardiomyocytedifferentiation
AT rhodeskatherine systematiccomparisonofhighthroughputsinglecellandsinglenucleustranscriptomesduringcardiomyocytedifferentiation
AT burnettjonathan systematiccomparisonofhighthroughputsinglecellandsinglenucleustranscriptomesduringcardiomyocytedifferentiation
AT giladyoav systematiccomparisonofhighthroughputsinglecellandsinglenucleustranscriptomesduringcardiomyocytedifferentiation
AT pottsebastian systematiccomparisonofhighthroughputsinglecellandsinglenucleustranscriptomesduringcardiomyocytedifferentiation
AT basuanindita systematiccomparisonofhighthroughputsinglecellandsinglenucleustranscriptomesduringcardiomyocytedifferentiation