Cargando…

DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of dose fractionation and time delay post-neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI parameters in early stage breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI was acquired in 17 patients pre- and post-SABR. Fiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mouawad, Matthew, Biernaski, Heather, Brackstone, Muriel, Lock, Michael, Yaremko, Brian, Shmuilovich, Olga, Kornecki, Anat, Ben Nachum, Ilanit, Muscedere, Giulio, Lynn, Kalan, Prato, Frank S., Thompson, R. Terry, Gaede, Stewart, Gelman, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2019.12.004
_version_ 1783492956980772864
author Mouawad, Matthew
Biernaski, Heather
Brackstone, Muriel
Lock, Michael
Yaremko, Brian
Shmuilovich, Olga
Kornecki, Anat
Ben Nachum, Ilanit
Muscedere, Giulio
Lynn, Kalan
Prato, Frank S.
Thompson, R. Terry
Gaede, Stewart
Gelman, Neil
author_facet Mouawad, Matthew
Biernaski, Heather
Brackstone, Muriel
Lock, Michael
Yaremko, Brian
Shmuilovich, Olga
Kornecki, Anat
Ben Nachum, Ilanit
Muscedere, Giulio
Lynn, Kalan
Prato, Frank S.
Thompson, R. Terry
Gaede, Stewart
Gelman, Neil
author_sort Mouawad, Matthew
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the effect of dose fractionation and time delay post-neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI parameters in early stage breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI was acquired in 17 patients pre- and post-SABR. Five patients were imaged 6–7 days post-21 Gy/1fraction (group 1), six 16–19 days post-21 Gy/1fraction (group 2), and six 16–18 days post-30 Gy/3 fractions every other day (group 3). DCE-MRI scans were performed using half the clinical dose of contrast agent. Changes in the surrounding tissue were quantified using a signal-enhancement threshold metric that characterizes changes in signal-enhancement volume (SEV). Tumour response was quantified using K(trans) and v(e) (Tofts model) pre- and post-SABR. Significance was assessed using a Wilcoxin signed-rank test. RESULTS: All group 1 and 4/6 group 2 patients’ SEV increased post-SABR. All group 3 patients’ SEV decreased. The mean K(trans) increased for group 1 by 76% (p = 0.043) while group 2 and 3 decreased 15% (p = 0.028) and 34% (p = 0.028), respectively. For v(e), there was no significant change in Group 1 (p = 0.35). Groups 2 showed an increase of 24% (p = 0.043), and Group 3 trended toward an increase (23%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Kinetic parameters measured 2.5 weeks post-SABR in both single fraction and three fraction groups were indicative of response but only the single fraction protocol led to enhancement in the surrounding tissue. Our results also suggest that DCE-MRI one-week post-SABR may be too early for response assessment, at least for single fraction SABR, whereas 2.5 weeks appears sufficiently long to minimize confounding acute effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6993055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69930552020-02-04 DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR Mouawad, Matthew Biernaski, Heather Brackstone, Muriel Lock, Michael Yaremko, Brian Shmuilovich, Olga Kornecki, Anat Ben Nachum, Ilanit Muscedere, Giulio Lynn, Kalan Prato, Frank S. Thompson, R. Terry Gaede, Stewart Gelman, Neil Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Article PURPOSE: To determine the effect of dose fractionation and time delay post-neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI parameters in early stage breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI was acquired in 17 patients pre- and post-SABR. Five patients were imaged 6–7 days post-21 Gy/1fraction (group 1), six 16–19 days post-21 Gy/1fraction (group 2), and six 16–18 days post-30 Gy/3 fractions every other day (group 3). DCE-MRI scans were performed using half the clinical dose of contrast agent. Changes in the surrounding tissue were quantified using a signal-enhancement threshold metric that characterizes changes in signal-enhancement volume (SEV). Tumour response was quantified using K(trans) and v(e) (Tofts model) pre- and post-SABR. Significance was assessed using a Wilcoxin signed-rank test. RESULTS: All group 1 and 4/6 group 2 patients’ SEV increased post-SABR. All group 3 patients’ SEV decreased. The mean K(trans) increased for group 1 by 76% (p = 0.043) while group 2 and 3 decreased 15% (p = 0.028) and 34% (p = 0.028), respectively. For v(e), there was no significant change in Group 1 (p = 0.35). Groups 2 showed an increase of 24% (p = 0.043), and Group 3 trended toward an increase (23%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Kinetic parameters measured 2.5 weeks post-SABR in both single fraction and three fraction groups were indicative of response but only the single fraction protocol led to enhancement in the surrounding tissue. Our results also suggest that DCE-MRI one-week post-SABR may be too early for response assessment, at least for single fraction SABR, whereas 2.5 weeks appears sufficiently long to minimize confounding acute effects. Elsevier 2019-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6993055/ /pubmed/32021911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2019.12.004 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mouawad, Matthew
Biernaski, Heather
Brackstone, Muriel
Lock, Michael
Yaremko, Brian
Shmuilovich, Olga
Kornecki, Anat
Ben Nachum, Ilanit
Muscedere, Giulio
Lynn, Kalan
Prato, Frank S.
Thompson, R. Terry
Gaede, Stewart
Gelman, Neil
DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR
title DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR
title_full DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR
title_fullStr DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR
title_full_unstemmed DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR
title_short DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR
title_sort dce-mri assessment of response to neoadjuvant sabr in early stage breast cancer: comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-sabr
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2019.12.004
work_keys_str_mv AT mouawadmatthew dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT biernaskiheather dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT brackstonemuriel dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT lockmichael dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT yaremkobrian dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT shmuilovicholga dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT korneckianat dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT bennachumilanit dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT muscederegiulio dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT lynnkalan dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT pratofranks dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT thompsonrterry dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT gaedestewart dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr
AT gelmanneil dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr