Cargando…
DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR
PURPOSE: To determine the effect of dose fractionation and time delay post-neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI parameters in early stage breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI was acquired in 17 patients pre- and post-SABR. Fiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2019.12.004 |
_version_ | 1783492956980772864 |
---|---|
author | Mouawad, Matthew Biernaski, Heather Brackstone, Muriel Lock, Michael Yaremko, Brian Shmuilovich, Olga Kornecki, Anat Ben Nachum, Ilanit Muscedere, Giulio Lynn, Kalan Prato, Frank S. Thompson, R. Terry Gaede, Stewart Gelman, Neil |
author_facet | Mouawad, Matthew Biernaski, Heather Brackstone, Muriel Lock, Michael Yaremko, Brian Shmuilovich, Olga Kornecki, Anat Ben Nachum, Ilanit Muscedere, Giulio Lynn, Kalan Prato, Frank S. Thompson, R. Terry Gaede, Stewart Gelman, Neil |
author_sort | Mouawad, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine the effect of dose fractionation and time delay post-neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI parameters in early stage breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI was acquired in 17 patients pre- and post-SABR. Five patients were imaged 6–7 days post-21 Gy/1fraction (group 1), six 16–19 days post-21 Gy/1fraction (group 2), and six 16–18 days post-30 Gy/3 fractions every other day (group 3). DCE-MRI scans were performed using half the clinical dose of contrast agent. Changes in the surrounding tissue were quantified using a signal-enhancement threshold metric that characterizes changes in signal-enhancement volume (SEV). Tumour response was quantified using K(trans) and v(e) (Tofts model) pre- and post-SABR. Significance was assessed using a Wilcoxin signed-rank test. RESULTS: All group 1 and 4/6 group 2 patients’ SEV increased post-SABR. All group 3 patients’ SEV decreased. The mean K(trans) increased for group 1 by 76% (p = 0.043) while group 2 and 3 decreased 15% (p = 0.028) and 34% (p = 0.028), respectively. For v(e), there was no significant change in Group 1 (p = 0.35). Groups 2 showed an increase of 24% (p = 0.043), and Group 3 trended toward an increase (23%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Kinetic parameters measured 2.5 weeks post-SABR in both single fraction and three fraction groups were indicative of response but only the single fraction protocol led to enhancement in the surrounding tissue. Our results also suggest that DCE-MRI one-week post-SABR may be too early for response assessment, at least for single fraction SABR, whereas 2.5 weeks appears sufficiently long to minimize confounding acute effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6993055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69930552020-02-04 DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR Mouawad, Matthew Biernaski, Heather Brackstone, Muriel Lock, Michael Yaremko, Brian Shmuilovich, Olga Kornecki, Anat Ben Nachum, Ilanit Muscedere, Giulio Lynn, Kalan Prato, Frank S. Thompson, R. Terry Gaede, Stewart Gelman, Neil Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Article PURPOSE: To determine the effect of dose fractionation and time delay post-neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI parameters in early stage breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI was acquired in 17 patients pre- and post-SABR. Five patients were imaged 6–7 days post-21 Gy/1fraction (group 1), six 16–19 days post-21 Gy/1fraction (group 2), and six 16–18 days post-30 Gy/3 fractions every other day (group 3). DCE-MRI scans were performed using half the clinical dose of contrast agent. Changes in the surrounding tissue were quantified using a signal-enhancement threshold metric that characterizes changes in signal-enhancement volume (SEV). Tumour response was quantified using K(trans) and v(e) (Tofts model) pre- and post-SABR. Significance was assessed using a Wilcoxin signed-rank test. RESULTS: All group 1 and 4/6 group 2 patients’ SEV increased post-SABR. All group 3 patients’ SEV decreased. The mean K(trans) increased for group 1 by 76% (p = 0.043) while group 2 and 3 decreased 15% (p = 0.028) and 34% (p = 0.028), respectively. For v(e), there was no significant change in Group 1 (p = 0.35). Groups 2 showed an increase of 24% (p = 0.043), and Group 3 trended toward an increase (23%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Kinetic parameters measured 2.5 weeks post-SABR in both single fraction and three fraction groups were indicative of response but only the single fraction protocol led to enhancement in the surrounding tissue. Our results also suggest that DCE-MRI one-week post-SABR may be too early for response assessment, at least for single fraction SABR, whereas 2.5 weeks appears sufficiently long to minimize confounding acute effects. Elsevier 2019-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6993055/ /pubmed/32021911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2019.12.004 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mouawad, Matthew Biernaski, Heather Brackstone, Muriel Lock, Michael Yaremko, Brian Shmuilovich, Olga Kornecki, Anat Ben Nachum, Ilanit Muscedere, Giulio Lynn, Kalan Prato, Frank S. Thompson, R. Terry Gaede, Stewart Gelman, Neil DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR |
title | DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR |
title_full | DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR |
title_fullStr | DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR |
title_full_unstemmed | DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR |
title_short | DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR |
title_sort | dce-mri assessment of response to neoadjuvant sabr in early stage breast cancer: comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-sabr |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2019.12.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mouawadmatthew dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT biernaskiheather dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT brackstonemuriel dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT lockmichael dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT yaremkobrian dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT shmuilovicholga dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT korneckianat dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT bennachumilanit dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT muscederegiulio dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT lynnkalan dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT pratofranks dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT thompsonrterry dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT gaedestewart dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr AT gelmanneil dcemriassessmentofresponsetoneoadjuvantsabrinearlystagebreastcancercomparisonsofsingleversusthreefractionschemesandtwodifferentimagingtimedelayspostsabr |