Cargando…

Dynamic Force Production Capacities Between Coronary Artery Disease Patients vs. Healthy Participants on a Cycle Ergometer

BACKGROUND: The force-velocity-power (FVP) profile is used to describe dynamic force production capacities, which is of great interest in training high performance athletes. However, FVP may serve a new additional tool for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. The ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fanget, Marie, Rossi, Jérémy, Samozino, Pierre, Morin, Jean-Benoît, Testa, Rodolphe, Roche, Frédéric, Busso, Thierry, Laukkanen, Jari Antero, Hupin, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32038306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01639
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The force-velocity-power (FVP) profile is used to describe dynamic force production capacities, which is of great interest in training high performance athletes. However, FVP may serve a new additional tool for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the FVP profile between two populations: CAD patients vs. healthy participants (HP). METHODS: Twenty-four CAD patients (55.8 ± 7.1 y) and 24 HP (52.4 ± 14.8 y) performed two sprints of 8 s on a Monark cycle ergometer with a resistance corresponding to 0.4 N/kg × body mass for men and 0.3 N/kg × body mass for women. The theoretical maximal force (F(0)) and velocity (V(0)), the slope of the force-velocity relationship (S(fv)) and the maximal mechanical power output (P(max)) were determined. RESULTS: The P(max) (CAD: 6.86 ± 2.26 W.kg(–1) vs. HP: 9.78 ± 4.08 W.kg(–1), p = 0.003), V(0) (CAD: 5.10 ± 0.82 m.s(–1) vs. HP: 5.79 ± 0.97 m.s(–1), p = 0.010), and F(0) (CAD: 1.35 ± 0.38 N.kg(–1) vs. HP: 1.65 ± 0.51 N.kg(–1), p = 0.039) were significantly higher in HP than in CAD. No significant difference appeared in S(fv) (CAD: −0.27 ± 0.07 N.kg(–1).m.s(–1) vs. HS: −0.28 ± 0.07 N.kg(–1).m.s(–1), p = 0.541). CONCLUSION: The lower maximal power in CAD patients was related to both a lower V(0) and F(0). Physical inactivity, sedentary time and high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk may explain this difference of force production at both high and low velocities between the two groups.