Cargando…

Long-term sperm cryopreservation does not affect post-thaw survival rates

OBJECTIVE: To compare cryosurvival rates of human spermatozoa in a prolonged period of cryopreservation. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 33 cryopreserved semen samples from patients with cancer, between 2002 and 2011. The semen sample was obtained by masturbation and initial semen analysi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pariz, Juliana R., Monteiro, Rosa Alice C., Hallak, Jorge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689041
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190066
_version_ 1783492972838387712
author Pariz, Juliana R.
Monteiro, Rosa Alice C.
Hallak, Jorge
author_facet Pariz, Juliana R.
Monteiro, Rosa Alice C.
Hallak, Jorge
author_sort Pariz, Juliana R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare cryosurvival rates of human spermatozoa in a prolonged period of cryopreservation. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 33 cryopreserved semen samples from patients with cancer, between 2002 and 2011. The semen sample was obtained by masturbation and initial semen analysis was performed. The cryoprotectant solution was added and samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen in a slow step-wise process. For thawing, the samples were incubated at 25.0ºC for 15 min, followed by incubation at 36.7ºC for 15 min. The cryosurvival rate (CS) was calculate by CS= [(% total motile sperm post-thaw) x100/(% total motile sperm/tube)]. Each study sample was divided into three aliquots (Study Group; n=23): (I) official patient sample, which was kept cryopreserved for subsequent Assisted Reproduction procedure, cryopreserved between 2002 and 2011; (II) sample destined to post-thaw tests, performed after the sample had been kept cryopreserved for 24 hours; and (III) study sample. Only in 2014, after 3-12 years of cryopreservation, the study samples were thawed and evaluated. To validate the study design, a Validation Group was created including 10 samples obtained between 2014 and 2016, using the same methodology in the study samples. The data was analyzed using the T-test, with a significant p-value of 5%. RESULTS: The mean age was 29.93±9.57 years in the Study Group and 21.80±6.49 years in the Validation Group. No significant difference between the Validation and Study Groups was found in the initial semen analysis (p>0.05). After 24 hours of cryopreservation, the cryosurvival rate was 26.11±46.36% in the Study Group and 23.71±57.06% in the Validation Group. Aliquots of the same sample preserved from 3-12 years demonstrated 23.71±57.06% of cryosurvival rate. Thus, no significant difference was found vis-à-vis the cryosurvival rates (p=0.56). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the method introduced in the late 1990s, which enables the removal of debris, potentially toxic elements and generators of reactive oxygen species from the seminal sample before cryopreservation, exhibited efficiency in maintaining the same cryosurvival rate after an extended period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6993159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69931592020-02-11 Long-term sperm cryopreservation does not affect post-thaw survival rates Pariz, Juliana R. Monteiro, Rosa Alice C. Hallak, Jorge JBRA Assist Reprod Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare cryosurvival rates of human spermatozoa in a prolonged period of cryopreservation. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 33 cryopreserved semen samples from patients with cancer, between 2002 and 2011. The semen sample was obtained by masturbation and initial semen analysis was performed. The cryoprotectant solution was added and samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen in a slow step-wise process. For thawing, the samples were incubated at 25.0ºC for 15 min, followed by incubation at 36.7ºC for 15 min. The cryosurvival rate (CS) was calculate by CS= [(% total motile sperm post-thaw) x100/(% total motile sperm/tube)]. Each study sample was divided into three aliquots (Study Group; n=23): (I) official patient sample, which was kept cryopreserved for subsequent Assisted Reproduction procedure, cryopreserved between 2002 and 2011; (II) sample destined to post-thaw tests, performed after the sample had been kept cryopreserved for 24 hours; and (III) study sample. Only in 2014, after 3-12 years of cryopreservation, the study samples were thawed and evaluated. To validate the study design, a Validation Group was created including 10 samples obtained between 2014 and 2016, using the same methodology in the study samples. The data was analyzed using the T-test, with a significant p-value of 5%. RESULTS: The mean age was 29.93±9.57 years in the Study Group and 21.80±6.49 years in the Validation Group. No significant difference between the Validation and Study Groups was found in the initial semen analysis (p>0.05). After 24 hours of cryopreservation, the cryosurvival rate was 26.11±46.36% in the Study Group and 23.71±57.06% in the Validation Group. Aliquots of the same sample preserved from 3-12 years demonstrated 23.71±57.06% of cryosurvival rate. Thus, no significant difference was found vis-à-vis the cryosurvival rates (p=0.56). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the method introduced in the late 1990s, which enables the removal of debris, potentially toxic elements and generators of reactive oxygen species from the seminal sample before cryopreservation, exhibited efficiency in maintaining the same cryosurvival rate after an extended period. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6993159/ /pubmed/31689041 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190066 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pariz, Juliana R.
Monteiro, Rosa Alice C.
Hallak, Jorge
Long-term sperm cryopreservation does not affect post-thaw survival rates
title Long-term sperm cryopreservation does not affect post-thaw survival rates
title_full Long-term sperm cryopreservation does not affect post-thaw survival rates
title_fullStr Long-term sperm cryopreservation does not affect post-thaw survival rates
title_full_unstemmed Long-term sperm cryopreservation does not affect post-thaw survival rates
title_short Long-term sperm cryopreservation does not affect post-thaw survival rates
title_sort long-term sperm cryopreservation does not affect post-thaw survival rates
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689041
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190066
work_keys_str_mv AT parizjulianar longtermspermcryopreservationdoesnotaffectpostthawsurvivalrates
AT monteirorosaalicec longtermspermcryopreservationdoesnotaffectpostthawsurvivalrates
AT hallakjorge longtermspermcryopreservationdoesnotaffectpostthawsurvivalrates