Cargando…
Prospective randomized comparison of cerebrospinal fluid aspiration and conventional popping methods using 27-gauge spinal needles in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia
BACKGROUND: Performing spinal anaesthesia using the conventional popping method with a 27-gauge (27G) spinal needle is technically difficult. In this study, we compared the aspiration and conventional popping method for spinal anaesthesia using 27G Quincke-type needles. METHODS: This prospective, ra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-0954-9 |
_version_ | 1783493009099194368 |
---|---|
author | Han, J. U. Kim, B. G. Yang, C. Choi, W. H. Jeong, J. Lee, K. J. Kim, H. |
author_facet | Han, J. U. Kim, B. G. Yang, C. Choi, W. H. Jeong, J. Lee, K. J. Kim, H. |
author_sort | Han, J. U. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Performing spinal anaesthesia using the conventional popping method with a 27-gauge (27G) spinal needle is technically difficult. In this study, we compared the aspiration and conventional popping method for spinal anaesthesia using 27G Quincke-type needles. METHODS: This prospective, randomized study enrolled 90 patients, aged 19 to 65 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III, who were undergoing spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups using a computer-generated random number table: patients receiving spinal anaesthesia using the aspiration method, in which the needle is advanced with continuous aspiration, or the conventional popping method. The primary outcome measure was the success rate of the first attempt to perform dural puncture. Number of attempts and passages, withdrawal cases, successful attempt time, total procedure time, and actual depth of dural puncture were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included in the study. In the aspiration group, the success rate of first attempt for dural puncture was 93.3%, compared with 72.1% in the popping group (P = 0.019). Success involving needle withdrawal was recorded in 4 (8.9%) patients in the aspiration group and 13 (30.2%) in the popping group (P = 0.024). In the popping group, the number of attempts was significantly higher (P = 0.044), and total procedure time was significantly longer (P = 0.023). Actual depths of dural puncture were deeper in the popping group than in the aspiration group (P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The aspiration method using a 27G Quincke-type needle offers clinical benefits for dural puncture compared with the conventional popping method for spinal anaesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical research information service number: KCT0002815, registered 21/Apr/2018. Retrospectively registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6993332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69933322020-02-04 Prospective randomized comparison of cerebrospinal fluid aspiration and conventional popping methods using 27-gauge spinal needles in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia Han, J. U. Kim, B. G. Yang, C. Choi, W. H. Jeong, J. Lee, K. J. Kim, H. BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Performing spinal anaesthesia using the conventional popping method with a 27-gauge (27G) spinal needle is technically difficult. In this study, we compared the aspiration and conventional popping method for spinal anaesthesia using 27G Quincke-type needles. METHODS: This prospective, randomized study enrolled 90 patients, aged 19 to 65 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III, who were undergoing spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups using a computer-generated random number table: patients receiving spinal anaesthesia using the aspiration method, in which the needle is advanced with continuous aspiration, or the conventional popping method. The primary outcome measure was the success rate of the first attempt to perform dural puncture. Number of attempts and passages, withdrawal cases, successful attempt time, total procedure time, and actual depth of dural puncture were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included in the study. In the aspiration group, the success rate of first attempt for dural puncture was 93.3%, compared with 72.1% in the popping group (P = 0.019). Success involving needle withdrawal was recorded in 4 (8.9%) patients in the aspiration group and 13 (30.2%) in the popping group (P = 0.024). In the popping group, the number of attempts was significantly higher (P = 0.044), and total procedure time was significantly longer (P = 0.023). Actual depths of dural puncture were deeper in the popping group than in the aspiration group (P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The aspiration method using a 27G Quincke-type needle offers clinical benefits for dural puncture compared with the conventional popping method for spinal anaesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical research information service number: KCT0002815, registered 21/Apr/2018. Retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6993332/ /pubmed/32000680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-0954-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Han, J. U. Kim, B. G. Yang, C. Choi, W. H. Jeong, J. Lee, K. J. Kim, H. Prospective randomized comparison of cerebrospinal fluid aspiration and conventional popping methods using 27-gauge spinal needles in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia |
title | Prospective randomized comparison of cerebrospinal fluid aspiration and conventional popping methods using 27-gauge spinal needles in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia |
title_full | Prospective randomized comparison of cerebrospinal fluid aspiration and conventional popping methods using 27-gauge spinal needles in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia |
title_fullStr | Prospective randomized comparison of cerebrospinal fluid aspiration and conventional popping methods using 27-gauge spinal needles in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective randomized comparison of cerebrospinal fluid aspiration and conventional popping methods using 27-gauge spinal needles in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia |
title_short | Prospective randomized comparison of cerebrospinal fluid aspiration and conventional popping methods using 27-gauge spinal needles in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia |
title_sort | prospective randomized comparison of cerebrospinal fluid aspiration and conventional popping methods using 27-gauge spinal needles in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-0954-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanju prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidaspirationandconventionalpoppingmethodsusing27gaugespinalneedlesinpatientsundergoingspinalanaesthesia AT kimbg prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidaspirationandconventionalpoppingmethodsusing27gaugespinalneedlesinpatientsundergoingspinalanaesthesia AT yangc prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidaspirationandconventionalpoppingmethodsusing27gaugespinalneedlesinpatientsundergoingspinalanaesthesia AT choiwh prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidaspirationandconventionalpoppingmethodsusing27gaugespinalneedlesinpatientsundergoingspinalanaesthesia AT jeongj prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidaspirationandconventionalpoppingmethodsusing27gaugespinalneedlesinpatientsundergoingspinalanaesthesia AT leekj prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidaspirationandconventionalpoppingmethodsusing27gaugespinalneedlesinpatientsundergoingspinalanaesthesia AT kimh prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidaspirationandconventionalpoppingmethodsusing27gaugespinalneedlesinpatientsundergoingspinalanaesthesia |