Cargando…

Survey of current practices from an international task force for gynecological stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) is an effective treatment that improves local control for many tumours. However, the role of SABR in gynecological cancers (GYN) has not been well-established. We hypothesize that there exists considerable variation in GYN-SABR practice and techn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leung, E., Gladwish, A., Sahgal, A., Lo, S. S., Kunos, C. A., Lanciano, R. M., Mantz, C. A., Guckenberger, M., Zagar, T. M., Mayr, N. A., Chang, A. R., Jorcano, S., Biswas, T., Pontoriero, A., Albuquerque, K. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-1469-8
_version_ 1783493018027819008
author Leung, E.
Gladwish, A.
Sahgal, A.
Lo, S. S.
Kunos, C. A.
Lanciano, R. M.
Mantz, C. A.
Guckenberger, M.
Zagar, T. M.
Mayr, N. A.
Chang, A. R.
Jorcano, S.
Biswas, T.
Pontoriero, A.
Albuquerque, K. V.
author_facet Leung, E.
Gladwish, A.
Sahgal, A.
Lo, S. S.
Kunos, C. A.
Lanciano, R. M.
Mantz, C. A.
Guckenberger, M.
Zagar, T. M.
Mayr, N. A.
Chang, A. R.
Jorcano, S.
Biswas, T.
Pontoriero, A.
Albuquerque, K. V.
author_sort Leung, E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) is an effective treatment that improves local control for many tumours. However, the role of SABR in gynecological cancers (GYN) has not been well-established. We hypothesize that there exists considerable variation in GYN-SABR practice and technique. The goal of this study is to describe clinical and technical factors in utilization of GYN-SABR among 11 experienced radiation oncologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 63 question survey on GYN-SABR was sent to 11 radiation oncologists (5 countries) who have published original research, conducted trials or have an established program at their institutions. Responses were combined and analyzed at a central institution. RESULTS: Most respondents indicated that salvage therapy (non-irradiated or re-irradiated field) for nodal (81%) and primary recurrent disease (91%) could be considered standard options for SABR in the setting of inability to administer brachytherapy. All other indications should be considered on clinical trials. Most would not offer SABR as a boost in primary treatment off-trial without absolute contraindications to brachytherapy. Multi-modality imaging is often (91%) used for planning including PET, CT contrast and MRI. There is a wide variation for OAR tolerances however small bowel is considered the dose-limiting structure for most experts (91%). Fractionation schedules range from 3 to 6 fractions for nodal/primary definitive and boost SABR. CONCLUSIONS: Although SABR has become increasingly standard in other oncology disease sites, there remains a wide variation in both clinical and technical factors when treating GYN cancers. Nodal and recurrent disease is considered a potential indication for SABR whereas other indications should be offered on clinical trials. This study summarizes SABR practices among GYN radiation oncologists while further studies are needed to establish consensus guidelines for GYN-SABR treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6993370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69933702020-02-04 Survey of current practices from an international task force for gynecological stereotactic ablative radiotherapy Leung, E. Gladwish, A. Sahgal, A. Lo, S. S. Kunos, C. A. Lanciano, R. M. Mantz, C. A. Guckenberger, M. Zagar, T. M. Mayr, N. A. Chang, A. R. Jorcano, S. Biswas, T. Pontoriero, A. Albuquerque, K. V. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) is an effective treatment that improves local control for many tumours. However, the role of SABR in gynecological cancers (GYN) has not been well-established. We hypothesize that there exists considerable variation in GYN-SABR practice and technique. The goal of this study is to describe clinical and technical factors in utilization of GYN-SABR among 11 experienced radiation oncologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 63 question survey on GYN-SABR was sent to 11 radiation oncologists (5 countries) who have published original research, conducted trials or have an established program at their institutions. Responses were combined and analyzed at a central institution. RESULTS: Most respondents indicated that salvage therapy (non-irradiated or re-irradiated field) for nodal (81%) and primary recurrent disease (91%) could be considered standard options for SABR in the setting of inability to administer brachytherapy. All other indications should be considered on clinical trials. Most would not offer SABR as a boost in primary treatment off-trial without absolute contraindications to brachytherapy. Multi-modality imaging is often (91%) used for planning including PET, CT contrast and MRI. There is a wide variation for OAR tolerances however small bowel is considered the dose-limiting structure for most experts (91%). Fractionation schedules range from 3 to 6 fractions for nodal/primary definitive and boost SABR. CONCLUSIONS: Although SABR has become increasingly standard in other oncology disease sites, there remains a wide variation in both clinical and technical factors when treating GYN cancers. Nodal and recurrent disease is considered a potential indication for SABR whereas other indications should be offered on clinical trials. This study summarizes SABR practices among GYN radiation oncologists while further studies are needed to establish consensus guidelines for GYN-SABR treatment. BioMed Central 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6993370/ /pubmed/32000833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-1469-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Leung, E.
Gladwish, A.
Sahgal, A.
Lo, S. S.
Kunos, C. A.
Lanciano, R. M.
Mantz, C. A.
Guckenberger, M.
Zagar, T. M.
Mayr, N. A.
Chang, A. R.
Jorcano, S.
Biswas, T.
Pontoriero, A.
Albuquerque, K. V.
Survey of current practices from an international task force for gynecological stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
title Survey of current practices from an international task force for gynecological stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
title_full Survey of current practices from an international task force for gynecological stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
title_fullStr Survey of current practices from an international task force for gynecological stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Survey of current practices from an international task force for gynecological stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
title_short Survey of current practices from an international task force for gynecological stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
title_sort survey of current practices from an international task force for gynecological stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-1469-8
work_keys_str_mv AT leunge surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT gladwisha surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT sahgala surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT loss surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT kunosca surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT lancianorm surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT mantzca surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT guckenbergerm surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT zagartm surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT mayrna surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT changar surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT jorcanos surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT biswast surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT pontorieroa surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy
AT albuquerquekv surveyofcurrentpracticesfromaninternationaltaskforceforgynecologicalstereotacticablativeradiotherapy