Cargando…

Effect of air-polishing on surface roughness of composite dental restorative material – comparison of three different air-polishing powders

BACKGROUND: Increased composite roughness enhances bacterial adhesion and discoloration, thus increasing the risk of gingival inflammation and secondary caries. Concerns about detrimental effects of sodium bicarbonate on surface roughness influenced the development of less abrasive powders: a glycin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna, Drozdzik, Agnieszka, Tandecka, Katarzyna, Grocholewicz, Katarzyna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1007-y
_version_ 1783493036845563904
author Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna
Drozdzik, Agnieszka
Tandecka, Katarzyna
Grocholewicz, Katarzyna
author_facet Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna
Drozdzik, Agnieszka
Tandecka, Katarzyna
Grocholewicz, Katarzyna
author_sort Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increased composite roughness enhances bacterial adhesion and discoloration, thus increasing the risk of gingival inflammation and secondary caries. Concerns about detrimental effects of sodium bicarbonate on surface roughness influenced the development of less abrasive powders: a glycine-based powder and an erythritol-based powder, additionally - sodium bicarbonate-based powder of reduced grain size. However, there is limited evidence on effects of these materials on the surface of dental fillings. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of three air-polishing powders (of a reduced abrasiveness) on surface roughness of microhybrid restorative composite material. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Microhybrid light-cure resin composite samples were placed on 64 plaster cubes and light-cured through polyester strips. Surface roughness was measured using laser confocal microscope (magnification 2160x). The specimens were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20, 20 and 24) and air-polished with: sodium bicarbonate (40 μm), glycine (25 μm) and erythritol (14 μm), respectively. Then surface roughness was remeasured, keeping the same field of observation. Specialized 3D analysis software was used for data processing. Parameters according to ISO 25178: Sa, Sq, Sku, Sp, Sv, Sz, Ssk were used to describe surface roughness. RESULTS: Sa, Sq, Sp, Sv, Sz increased significantly following air polishing. Ssk was significantly higher, whereas Sku was significantly lower in sodium bicarbonate and erythritol groups than before air polishing. Comparison between the three powders revealed that Sa was significantly higher in sodium bicarbonate group than in glycine group. Sku was significantly higher in glycine and erythritol groups than in sodium bicarbonate group. CONCLUSIONS: Sodium bicarbonate has a stronger detrimental effect on composite surface than glycine or erythritol. No advantage of erythritol comparing to glycine could be found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6993449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69934492020-02-04 Effect of air-polishing on surface roughness of composite dental restorative material – comparison of three different air-polishing powders Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna Drozdzik, Agnieszka Tandecka, Katarzyna Grocholewicz, Katarzyna BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Increased composite roughness enhances bacterial adhesion and discoloration, thus increasing the risk of gingival inflammation and secondary caries. Concerns about detrimental effects of sodium bicarbonate on surface roughness influenced the development of less abrasive powders: a glycine-based powder and an erythritol-based powder, additionally - sodium bicarbonate-based powder of reduced grain size. However, there is limited evidence on effects of these materials on the surface of dental fillings. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of three air-polishing powders (of a reduced abrasiveness) on surface roughness of microhybrid restorative composite material. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Microhybrid light-cure resin composite samples were placed on 64 plaster cubes and light-cured through polyester strips. Surface roughness was measured using laser confocal microscope (magnification 2160x). The specimens were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20, 20 and 24) and air-polished with: sodium bicarbonate (40 μm), glycine (25 μm) and erythritol (14 μm), respectively. Then surface roughness was remeasured, keeping the same field of observation. Specialized 3D analysis software was used for data processing. Parameters according to ISO 25178: Sa, Sq, Sku, Sp, Sv, Sz, Ssk were used to describe surface roughness. RESULTS: Sa, Sq, Sp, Sv, Sz increased significantly following air polishing. Ssk was significantly higher, whereas Sku was significantly lower in sodium bicarbonate and erythritol groups than before air polishing. Comparison between the three powders revealed that Sa was significantly higher in sodium bicarbonate group than in glycine group. Sku was significantly higher in glycine and erythritol groups than in sodium bicarbonate group. CONCLUSIONS: Sodium bicarbonate has a stronger detrimental effect on composite surface than glycine or erythritol. No advantage of erythritol comparing to glycine could be found. BioMed Central 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6993449/ /pubmed/32000753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1007-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna
Drozdzik, Agnieszka
Tandecka, Katarzyna
Grocholewicz, Katarzyna
Effect of air-polishing on surface roughness of composite dental restorative material – comparison of three different air-polishing powders
title Effect of air-polishing on surface roughness of composite dental restorative material – comparison of three different air-polishing powders
title_full Effect of air-polishing on surface roughness of composite dental restorative material – comparison of three different air-polishing powders
title_fullStr Effect of air-polishing on surface roughness of composite dental restorative material – comparison of three different air-polishing powders
title_full_unstemmed Effect of air-polishing on surface roughness of composite dental restorative material – comparison of three different air-polishing powders
title_short Effect of air-polishing on surface roughness of composite dental restorative material – comparison of three different air-polishing powders
title_sort effect of air-polishing on surface roughness of composite dental restorative material – comparison of three different air-polishing powders
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1007-y
work_keys_str_mv AT janiszewskaolszowskajoanna effectofairpolishingonsurfaceroughnessofcompositedentalrestorativematerialcomparisonofthreedifferentairpolishingpowders
AT drozdzikagnieszka effectofairpolishingonsurfaceroughnessofcompositedentalrestorativematerialcomparisonofthreedifferentairpolishingpowders
AT tandeckakatarzyna effectofairpolishingonsurfaceroughnessofcompositedentalrestorativematerialcomparisonofthreedifferentairpolishingpowders
AT grocholewiczkatarzyna effectofairpolishingonsurfaceroughnessofcompositedentalrestorativematerialcomparisonofthreedifferentairpolishingpowders