Cargando…

Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar

BACKGROUND: Plague is a highly fatal disease caused by Yersinia pestis. Late diagnosis hampers disease outcome and effectiveness of control measures, induces death and disease spread. Advance on its diagnosis was the use of lateral flow rapid diagnostic test (RDT). METHODS: We assessed the performan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajerison, Minoarisoa, Melocco, Marie, Andrianaivoarimanana, Voahangy, Rahajandraibe, Soloandry, Rakotoarimanana, Feno, Spiegel, André, Ratsitorahina, Maherisoa, Baril, Laurence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4812-7
_version_ 1783493052830056448
author Rajerison, Minoarisoa
Melocco, Marie
Andrianaivoarimanana, Voahangy
Rahajandraibe, Soloandry
Rakotoarimanana, Feno
Spiegel, André
Ratsitorahina, Maherisoa
Baril, Laurence
author_facet Rajerison, Minoarisoa
Melocco, Marie
Andrianaivoarimanana, Voahangy
Rahajandraibe, Soloandry
Rakotoarimanana, Feno
Spiegel, André
Ratsitorahina, Maherisoa
Baril, Laurence
author_sort Rajerison, Minoarisoa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Plague is a highly fatal disease caused by Yersinia pestis. Late diagnosis hampers disease outcome and effectiveness of control measures, induces death and disease spread. Advance on its diagnosis was the use of lateral flow rapid diagnostic test (RDT). METHODS: We assessed the performance of the plague RDT based on Y. pestis F1 antigen detection more than 15 years after its deployment in Madagascar. We compared the RDT with bacteriological culture results, using data from plague notified cases collected during the periods for which both tests were performed independently and systematically. RESULTS: Used with bubonic plague (BP) patient samples, RDTs had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 99.7–100%), a specificity of 67% (95% CI: 64–70%) with a good agreement between bacteriology and RDT results (86%; κ = 0.70, 95% CI 0.67–0.73). For pneumonic plague (PP), RDT had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 91–100%) and a specificity of 59% (95% CI: 49–68%) and concordance between the bacteriological and plague RDT results was moderate (70%; κ = 0.43, 95% CI 0.32–0.55). Analysis focusing on the 2017–2018 plague season including the unprecedented epidemic of PP showed that RDT used on BP samples still had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 85–100%) and a specificity of 82% (95% CI: 48–98%) with a very good agreement with bacteriology 94% (κ = 0.86, 95% CI 0.67–1); for PP samples, concordance between the bacteriological and plague RDT results was poor (61%; κ = − 0.03, 95% CI -0.17 – 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: RDT performance appeared to be similar for the diagnosis of BP and PP except during the 2017 PP epidemic where RDT performance was low. This RDT, with its good sensitivity on both plague clinical forms during a normal plague season, remained a potential test for alert. Particularly for BP, it may be of great value in the decision process for the initiation of therapy. However, for PP, RDT may deliver false negative results due to inconsistent sample quality. Plague diagnosis could be improved through the development of next generation of RDTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6993518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69935182020-02-04 Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar Rajerison, Minoarisoa Melocco, Marie Andrianaivoarimanana, Voahangy Rahajandraibe, Soloandry Rakotoarimanana, Feno Spiegel, André Ratsitorahina, Maherisoa Baril, Laurence BMC Infect Dis Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Plague is a highly fatal disease caused by Yersinia pestis. Late diagnosis hampers disease outcome and effectiveness of control measures, induces death and disease spread. Advance on its diagnosis was the use of lateral flow rapid diagnostic test (RDT). METHODS: We assessed the performance of the plague RDT based on Y. pestis F1 antigen detection more than 15 years after its deployment in Madagascar. We compared the RDT with bacteriological culture results, using data from plague notified cases collected during the periods for which both tests were performed independently and systematically. RESULTS: Used with bubonic plague (BP) patient samples, RDTs had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 99.7–100%), a specificity of 67% (95% CI: 64–70%) with a good agreement between bacteriology and RDT results (86%; κ = 0.70, 95% CI 0.67–0.73). For pneumonic plague (PP), RDT had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 91–100%) and a specificity of 59% (95% CI: 49–68%) and concordance between the bacteriological and plague RDT results was moderate (70%; κ = 0.43, 95% CI 0.32–0.55). Analysis focusing on the 2017–2018 plague season including the unprecedented epidemic of PP showed that RDT used on BP samples still had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 85–100%) and a specificity of 82% (95% CI: 48–98%) with a very good agreement with bacteriology 94% (κ = 0.86, 95% CI 0.67–1); for PP samples, concordance between the bacteriological and plague RDT results was poor (61%; κ = − 0.03, 95% CI -0.17 – 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: RDT performance appeared to be similar for the diagnosis of BP and PP except during the 2017 PP epidemic where RDT performance was low. This RDT, with its good sensitivity on both plague clinical forms during a normal plague season, remained a potential test for alert. Particularly for BP, it may be of great value in the decision process for the initiation of therapy. However, for PP, RDT may deliver false negative results due to inconsistent sample quality. Plague diagnosis could be improved through the development of next generation of RDTs. BioMed Central 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6993518/ /pubmed/32000692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4812-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Rajerison, Minoarisoa
Melocco, Marie
Andrianaivoarimanana, Voahangy
Rahajandraibe, Soloandry
Rakotoarimanana, Feno
Spiegel, André
Ratsitorahina, Maherisoa
Baril, Laurence
Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar
title Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar
title_full Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar
title_fullStr Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar
title_full_unstemmed Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar
title_short Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar
title_sort performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in madagascar
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4812-7
work_keys_str_mv AT rajerisonminoarisoa performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar
AT meloccomarie performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar
AT andrianaivoarimananavoahangy performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar
AT rahajandraibesoloandry performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar
AT rakotoarimananafeno performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar
AT spiegelandre performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar
AT ratsitorahinamaherisoa performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar
AT barillaurence performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar