Cargando…
Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar
BACKGROUND: Plague is a highly fatal disease caused by Yersinia pestis. Late diagnosis hampers disease outcome and effectiveness of control measures, induces death and disease spread. Advance on its diagnosis was the use of lateral flow rapid diagnostic test (RDT). METHODS: We assessed the performan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4812-7 |
_version_ | 1783493052830056448 |
---|---|
author | Rajerison, Minoarisoa Melocco, Marie Andrianaivoarimanana, Voahangy Rahajandraibe, Soloandry Rakotoarimanana, Feno Spiegel, André Ratsitorahina, Maherisoa Baril, Laurence |
author_facet | Rajerison, Minoarisoa Melocco, Marie Andrianaivoarimanana, Voahangy Rahajandraibe, Soloandry Rakotoarimanana, Feno Spiegel, André Ratsitorahina, Maherisoa Baril, Laurence |
author_sort | Rajerison, Minoarisoa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Plague is a highly fatal disease caused by Yersinia pestis. Late diagnosis hampers disease outcome and effectiveness of control measures, induces death and disease spread. Advance on its diagnosis was the use of lateral flow rapid diagnostic test (RDT). METHODS: We assessed the performance of the plague RDT based on Y. pestis F1 antigen detection more than 15 years after its deployment in Madagascar. We compared the RDT with bacteriological culture results, using data from plague notified cases collected during the periods for which both tests were performed independently and systematically. RESULTS: Used with bubonic plague (BP) patient samples, RDTs had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 99.7–100%), a specificity of 67% (95% CI: 64–70%) with a good agreement between bacteriology and RDT results (86%; κ = 0.70, 95% CI 0.67–0.73). For pneumonic plague (PP), RDT had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 91–100%) and a specificity of 59% (95% CI: 49–68%) and concordance between the bacteriological and plague RDT results was moderate (70%; κ = 0.43, 95% CI 0.32–0.55). Analysis focusing on the 2017–2018 plague season including the unprecedented epidemic of PP showed that RDT used on BP samples still had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 85–100%) and a specificity of 82% (95% CI: 48–98%) with a very good agreement with bacteriology 94% (κ = 0.86, 95% CI 0.67–1); for PP samples, concordance between the bacteriological and plague RDT results was poor (61%; κ = − 0.03, 95% CI -0.17 – 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: RDT performance appeared to be similar for the diagnosis of BP and PP except during the 2017 PP epidemic where RDT performance was low. This RDT, with its good sensitivity on both plague clinical forms during a normal plague season, remained a potential test for alert. Particularly for BP, it may be of great value in the decision process for the initiation of therapy. However, for PP, RDT may deliver false negative results due to inconsistent sample quality. Plague diagnosis could be improved through the development of next generation of RDTs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6993518 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69935182020-02-04 Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar Rajerison, Minoarisoa Melocco, Marie Andrianaivoarimanana, Voahangy Rahajandraibe, Soloandry Rakotoarimanana, Feno Spiegel, André Ratsitorahina, Maherisoa Baril, Laurence BMC Infect Dis Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Plague is a highly fatal disease caused by Yersinia pestis. Late diagnosis hampers disease outcome and effectiveness of control measures, induces death and disease spread. Advance on its diagnosis was the use of lateral flow rapid diagnostic test (RDT). METHODS: We assessed the performance of the plague RDT based on Y. pestis F1 antigen detection more than 15 years after its deployment in Madagascar. We compared the RDT with bacteriological culture results, using data from plague notified cases collected during the periods for which both tests were performed independently and systematically. RESULTS: Used with bubonic plague (BP) patient samples, RDTs had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 99.7–100%), a specificity of 67% (95% CI: 64–70%) with a good agreement between bacteriology and RDT results (86%; κ = 0.70, 95% CI 0.67–0.73). For pneumonic plague (PP), RDT had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 91–100%) and a specificity of 59% (95% CI: 49–68%) and concordance between the bacteriological and plague RDT results was moderate (70%; κ = 0.43, 95% CI 0.32–0.55). Analysis focusing on the 2017–2018 plague season including the unprecedented epidemic of PP showed that RDT used on BP samples still had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 85–100%) and a specificity of 82% (95% CI: 48–98%) with a very good agreement with bacteriology 94% (κ = 0.86, 95% CI 0.67–1); for PP samples, concordance between the bacteriological and plague RDT results was poor (61%; κ = − 0.03, 95% CI -0.17 – 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: RDT performance appeared to be similar for the diagnosis of BP and PP except during the 2017 PP epidemic where RDT performance was low. This RDT, with its good sensitivity on both plague clinical forms during a normal plague season, remained a potential test for alert. Particularly for BP, it may be of great value in the decision process for the initiation of therapy. However, for PP, RDT may deliver false negative results due to inconsistent sample quality. Plague diagnosis could be improved through the development of next generation of RDTs. BioMed Central 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6993518/ /pubmed/32000692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4812-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Rajerison, Minoarisoa Melocco, Marie Andrianaivoarimanana, Voahangy Rahajandraibe, Soloandry Rakotoarimanana, Feno Spiegel, André Ratsitorahina, Maherisoa Baril, Laurence Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar |
title | Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar |
title_full | Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar |
title_fullStr | Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar |
title_short | Performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in Madagascar |
title_sort | performance of plague rapid diagnostic test compared to bacteriology: a retrospective analysis of the data collected in madagascar |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4812-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajerisonminoarisoa performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar AT meloccomarie performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar AT andrianaivoarimananavoahangy performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar AT rahajandraibesoloandry performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar AT rakotoarimananafeno performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar AT spiegelandre performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar AT ratsitorahinamaherisoa performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar AT barillaurence performanceofplaguerapiddiagnostictestcomparedtobacteriologyaretrospectiveanalysisofthedatacollectedinmadagascar |