Cargando…

Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment

OBJECTIVES: To analyze current practices in shared decision-making (SDM) in primary care and perform a needs assessment for the role of information technology (IT) interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted in three phases: (1) ethnographic observation of clinical enco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Misra, Anjali J, Ong, Shawn Y, Gokhale, Arjun, Khan, Sameer, Melnick, Edward R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz027
_version_ 1783493132487229440
author Misra, Anjali J
Ong, Shawn Y
Gokhale, Arjun
Khan, Sameer
Melnick, Edward R
author_facet Misra, Anjali J
Ong, Shawn Y
Gokhale, Arjun
Khan, Sameer
Melnick, Edward R
author_sort Misra, Anjali J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To analyze current practices in shared decision-making (SDM) in primary care and perform a needs assessment for the role of information technology (IT) interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted in three phases: (1) ethnographic observation of clinical encounters, (2) patient interviews, and (3) physician interviews. SDM was measured using the validated OPTION scale. Semistructured interviews followed an interview guide (developed by our multidisciplinary team) informed by the Traditional Decision Conflict Scale and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire. Field notes were independently coded and analyzed by two reviewers in Dedoose. RESULTS: Twenty-four patient encounters were observed in 3 diverse practices with an average OPTION score of 57.2 (0–100 scale; 95% confidence interval [CI], 51.8–62.6). Twenty-two patient and 8 physician interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Cohen’s kappa, measuring coder agreement, was 0.42. Patient domains were: establishing trust, influence of others, flexibility, frustrations, values, and preferences. Physician domains included frustrations, technology (concerns, existing use, and desires), and decision making (current methods used, challenges, and patients’ understanding). DISCUSSION: Given low SDM observed, multiple opportunities for technology to enhance SDM exist based on specific OPTION items that received lower scores, including: (1) checking the patient’s preferred information format, (2) asking the patient's preferred level of involvement in decision making, and (3) providing an opportunity for deferring a decision. Based on data from interviews, patients and physicians value information exchange and are open to technologies that enhance communication of care options. CONCLUSION: Future primary care IT platforms should prioritize the 3 quantitative gaps identified to improve physician–patient communication and relationships. Additionally, SDM tools should seek to standardize common workflow steps across decisions and focus on barriers to increasing adoption of effective SDM tools into routine primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6993997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69939972020-02-05 Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment Misra, Anjali J Ong, Shawn Y Gokhale, Arjun Khan, Sameer Melnick, Edward R JAMIA Open Research and Applications OBJECTIVES: To analyze current practices in shared decision-making (SDM) in primary care and perform a needs assessment for the role of information technology (IT) interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted in three phases: (1) ethnographic observation of clinical encounters, (2) patient interviews, and (3) physician interviews. SDM was measured using the validated OPTION scale. Semistructured interviews followed an interview guide (developed by our multidisciplinary team) informed by the Traditional Decision Conflict Scale and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire. Field notes were independently coded and analyzed by two reviewers in Dedoose. RESULTS: Twenty-four patient encounters were observed in 3 diverse practices with an average OPTION score of 57.2 (0–100 scale; 95% confidence interval [CI], 51.8–62.6). Twenty-two patient and 8 physician interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Cohen’s kappa, measuring coder agreement, was 0.42. Patient domains were: establishing trust, influence of others, flexibility, frustrations, values, and preferences. Physician domains included frustrations, technology (concerns, existing use, and desires), and decision making (current methods used, challenges, and patients’ understanding). DISCUSSION: Given low SDM observed, multiple opportunities for technology to enhance SDM exist based on specific OPTION items that received lower scores, including: (1) checking the patient’s preferred information format, (2) asking the patient's preferred level of involvement in decision making, and (3) providing an opportunity for deferring a decision. Based on data from interviews, patients and physicians value information exchange and are open to technologies that enhance communication of care options. CONCLUSION: Future primary care IT platforms should prioritize the 3 quantitative gaps identified to improve physician–patient communication and relationships. Additionally, SDM tools should seek to standardize common workflow steps across decisions and focus on barriers to increasing adoption of effective SDM tools into routine primary care. Oxford University Press 2019-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6993997/ /pubmed/32025641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz027 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research and Applications
Misra, Anjali J
Ong, Shawn Y
Gokhale, Arjun
Khan, Sameer
Melnick, Edward R
Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment
title Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment
title_full Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment
title_fullStr Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment
title_full_unstemmed Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment
title_short Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment
title_sort opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment
topic Research and Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz027
work_keys_str_mv AT misraanjalij opportunitiesforaddressinggapsinprimarycareshareddecisionmakingwithtechnologyamixedmethodsneedsassessment
AT ongshawny opportunitiesforaddressinggapsinprimarycareshareddecisionmakingwithtechnologyamixedmethodsneedsassessment
AT gokhalearjun opportunitiesforaddressinggapsinprimarycareshareddecisionmakingwithtechnologyamixedmethodsneedsassessment
AT khansameer opportunitiesforaddressinggapsinprimarycareshareddecisionmakingwithtechnologyamixedmethodsneedsassessment
AT melnickedwardr opportunitiesforaddressinggapsinprimarycareshareddecisionmakingwithtechnologyamixedmethodsneedsassessment