Cargando…

Rolling resistance contribution to a road pavement life cycle carbon footprint analysis

PURPOSE: Although the impact of road pavement surface condition on rolling resistance has been included in the life cycle assessment (LCA) framework of several studies in the last years, there is still a high level of uncertainty concerning the methodological assumptions and the parameters that can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trupia, Laura, Parry, Tony, Neves, Luis C., Lo Presti, Davide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32063683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1203-9
_version_ 1783493166673952768
author Trupia, Laura
Parry, Tony
Neves, Luis C.
Lo Presti, Davide
author_facet Trupia, Laura
Parry, Tony
Neves, Luis C.
Lo Presti, Davide
author_sort Trupia, Laura
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Although the impact of road pavement surface condition on rolling resistance has been included in the life cycle assessment (LCA) framework of several studies in the last years, there is still a high level of uncertainty concerning the methodological assumptions and the parameters that can affect the results. In order to adopt pavement carbon footprint/LCA as a decision-making tool, it is necessary to explore the impact of the chosen methods and assumptions on the LCA results. METHODS: This paper provides a review of the main models describing the impact of the pavement surface properties on vehicle fuel consumption and analyses the influence of the methodological assumptions related to the rolling resistance on the LCA results. It compares the CO(2) emissions, calculated with two different rolling resistance models existing in literature, and performs a sensitivity test on some specific input variables (pavement deterioration rate, traffic growth, and emission factors/fuel efficiency improvement). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The model used to calculate the impact of the pavement surface condition on fuel consumption significantly affects the LCA results. The pavement deterioration rate influences the calculation in both models, while traffic growth and fuel efficiency improvement have a limited impact on the vehicle CO(2) emissions resulting from the pavement condition contribution to rolling resistance. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Existing models linking pavement condition to rolling resistance and hence vehicle emissions are not broadly applicable to the use phase of road pavement LCA and further research is necessary before a widely-used methodology can be defined. The methods of modelling and the methodological assumptions need to be transparent in the analysis of the impact of the pavement surface condition on fuel consumption, in order to be interpreted by decision makers and implemented in an LCA framework. This will be necessary before product category rules (PCR) for pavement LCA can be extended to include the use phase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6994223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69942232020-02-14 Rolling resistance contribution to a road pavement life cycle carbon footprint analysis Trupia, Laura Parry, Tony Neves, Luis C. Lo Presti, Davide Int J Life Cycle Assess Roadways and Infrastructure PURPOSE: Although the impact of road pavement surface condition on rolling resistance has been included in the life cycle assessment (LCA) framework of several studies in the last years, there is still a high level of uncertainty concerning the methodological assumptions and the parameters that can affect the results. In order to adopt pavement carbon footprint/LCA as a decision-making tool, it is necessary to explore the impact of the chosen methods and assumptions on the LCA results. METHODS: This paper provides a review of the main models describing the impact of the pavement surface properties on vehicle fuel consumption and analyses the influence of the methodological assumptions related to the rolling resistance on the LCA results. It compares the CO(2) emissions, calculated with two different rolling resistance models existing in literature, and performs a sensitivity test on some specific input variables (pavement deterioration rate, traffic growth, and emission factors/fuel efficiency improvement). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The model used to calculate the impact of the pavement surface condition on fuel consumption significantly affects the LCA results. The pavement deterioration rate influences the calculation in both models, while traffic growth and fuel efficiency improvement have a limited impact on the vehicle CO(2) emissions resulting from the pavement condition contribution to rolling resistance. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Existing models linking pavement condition to rolling resistance and hence vehicle emissions are not broadly applicable to the use phase of road pavement LCA and further research is necessary before a widely-used methodology can be defined. The methods of modelling and the methodological assumptions need to be transparent in the analysis of the impact of the pavement surface condition on fuel consumption, in order to be interpreted by decision makers and implemented in an LCA framework. This will be necessary before product category rules (PCR) for pavement LCA can be extended to include the use phase. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-10-01 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6994223/ /pubmed/32063683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1203-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Roadways and Infrastructure
Trupia, Laura
Parry, Tony
Neves, Luis C.
Lo Presti, Davide
Rolling resistance contribution to a road pavement life cycle carbon footprint analysis
title Rolling resistance contribution to a road pavement life cycle carbon footprint analysis
title_full Rolling resistance contribution to a road pavement life cycle carbon footprint analysis
title_fullStr Rolling resistance contribution to a road pavement life cycle carbon footprint analysis
title_full_unstemmed Rolling resistance contribution to a road pavement life cycle carbon footprint analysis
title_short Rolling resistance contribution to a road pavement life cycle carbon footprint analysis
title_sort rolling resistance contribution to a road pavement life cycle carbon footprint analysis
topic Roadways and Infrastructure
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32063683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1203-9
work_keys_str_mv AT trupialaura rollingresistancecontributiontoaroadpavementlifecyclecarbonfootprintanalysis
AT parrytony rollingresistancecontributiontoaroadpavementlifecyclecarbonfootprintanalysis
AT nevesluisc rollingresistancecontributiontoaroadpavementlifecyclecarbonfootprintanalysis
AT loprestidavide rollingresistancecontributiontoaroadpavementlifecyclecarbonfootprintanalysis