Cargando…

Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 (CEQ2) in the UK to see if it is an effective tool for evaluating labour experience. STUDY DESIGN: The CEQ2 and part of the Care Quality Commission Maternity Survey (2010) was sent to 475 women one month and six weeks after birth. It w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Kate F., Dencker, Anna, Thornton, Jim G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097
_version_ 1783493178814365696
author Walker, Kate F.
Dencker, Anna
Thornton, Jim G.
author_facet Walker, Kate F.
Dencker, Anna
Thornton, Jim G.
author_sort Walker, Kate F.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To validate the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 (CEQ2) in the UK to see if it is an effective tool for evaluating labour experience. STUDY DESIGN: The CEQ2 and part of the Care Quality Commission Maternity Survey (2010) was sent to 475 women one month and six weeks after birth. It was tested for face validity among 25 postnatal mothers. Demographic data and delivery data was used to establish construct validity using the method of known-groups validation. The results of the scored CEQ2 sent out twice were used to measure test-retest reliability by calculating the quadratic weighted index of agreement between the two scores. Criterion validity was measured by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient for the CEQ2 and Maternity Survey scores. RESULTS: Face validity of the CEQ2 in a UK population was demonstrated with all respondents stating it was easy to understand and complete. A statistically significantly higher CEQ2 score for subgroups of women known to report a better birth outcome demonstrated construct validity. A weighted kappa of 0.55 demonstrated test-retest reliability. A Pearson correlation co-efficient of 0.56 demonstrated a moderate correlation between the results of the CEQ2 and the results of the ‘gold standard’ assessment of childbirth experience in the UK: the Maternity Survey and hence criterion validity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2 (CEQ2) is a valid and reliable measure of childbirth experience in the UK population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6994391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69943912020-02-04 Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom Walker, Kate F. Dencker, Anna Thornton, Jim G. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine OBJECTIVE: To validate the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 (CEQ2) in the UK to see if it is an effective tool for evaluating labour experience. STUDY DESIGN: The CEQ2 and part of the Care Quality Commission Maternity Survey (2010) was sent to 475 women one month and six weeks after birth. It was tested for face validity among 25 postnatal mothers. Demographic data and delivery data was used to establish construct validity using the method of known-groups validation. The results of the scored CEQ2 sent out twice were used to measure test-retest reliability by calculating the quadratic weighted index of agreement between the two scores. Criterion validity was measured by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient for the CEQ2 and Maternity Survey scores. RESULTS: Face validity of the CEQ2 in a UK population was demonstrated with all respondents stating it was easy to understand and complete. A statistically significantly higher CEQ2 score for subgroups of women known to report a better birth outcome demonstrated construct validity. A weighted kappa of 0.55 demonstrated test-retest reliability. A Pearson correlation co-efficient of 0.56 demonstrated a moderate correlation between the results of the CEQ2 and the results of the ‘gold standard’ assessment of childbirth experience in the UK: the Maternity Survey and hence criterion validity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2 (CEQ2) is a valid and reliable measure of childbirth experience in the UK population. Elsevier 2019-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6994391/ /pubmed/32021972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine
Walker, Kate F.
Dencker, Anna
Thornton, Jim G.
Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom
title Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom
title_full Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom
title_short Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom
title_sort childbirth experience questionnaire 2: validating its use in the united kingdom
topic Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerkatef childbirthexperiencequestionnaire2validatingitsuseintheunitedkingdom
AT denckeranna childbirthexperiencequestionnaire2validatingitsuseintheunitedkingdom
AT thorntonjimg childbirthexperiencequestionnaire2validatingitsuseintheunitedkingdom