Cargando…

How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction

Classically, attentional selectivity has been conceptualized as a passive by-product of capacity limits on stimulus processing. Here, we examine the role of more active cognitive control processes in attentional selectivity, focusing on how distraction from task-irrelevant sound is modulated by leve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marsh, John E., Campbell, Tom A., Vachon, François, Taylor, Paul J., Hughes, Robert W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01800-w
_version_ 1783493184786006016
author Marsh, John E.
Campbell, Tom A.
Vachon, François
Taylor, Paul J.
Hughes, Robert W.
author_facet Marsh, John E.
Campbell, Tom A.
Vachon, François
Taylor, Paul J.
Hughes, Robert W.
author_sort Marsh, John E.
collection PubMed
description Classically, attentional selectivity has been conceptualized as a passive by-product of capacity limits on stimulus processing. Here, we examine the role of more active cognitive control processes in attentional selectivity, focusing on how distraction from task-irrelevant sound is modulated by levels of task engagement in a visually presented short-term memory task. Task engagement was varied by manipulating the load involved in the encoding of the (visually presented) to-be-remembered items. Using a list of Navon letters (where a large letter is composed of smaller, different-identity letters), participants were oriented to attend and serially recall the list of large letters (low encoding load) or to attend and serially recall the list of small letters (high encoding load). Attentional capture by a single deviant noise burst within a task-irrelevant tone sequence (the deviation effect) was eliminated under high encoding load (Experiment 1). However, distraction from a continuously changing sequence of tones (the changing-state effect) was immune to the influence of load (Experiment 2). This dissociation in the amenability of the deviation effect and the changing-state effect to cognitive control supports a duplex-mechanism over a unitary-mechanism account of auditory distraction in which the deviation effect is due to attentional capture whereas the changing-state effect reflects direct interference between the processing of the sound and processes involved in the focal task. That the changing-state effect survives high encoding load also goes against an alternative explanation of the attenuation of the deviation effect under high load in terms of the depletion of a limited perceptual resource that would result in diminished auditory processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6994418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69944182020-02-14 How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction Marsh, John E. Campbell, Tom A. Vachon, François Taylor, Paul J. Hughes, Robert W. Atten Percept Psychophys 40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman Classically, attentional selectivity has been conceptualized as a passive by-product of capacity limits on stimulus processing. Here, we examine the role of more active cognitive control processes in attentional selectivity, focusing on how distraction from task-irrelevant sound is modulated by levels of task engagement in a visually presented short-term memory task. Task engagement was varied by manipulating the load involved in the encoding of the (visually presented) to-be-remembered items. Using a list of Navon letters (where a large letter is composed of smaller, different-identity letters), participants were oriented to attend and serially recall the list of large letters (low encoding load) or to attend and serially recall the list of small letters (high encoding load). Attentional capture by a single deviant noise burst within a task-irrelevant tone sequence (the deviation effect) was eliminated under high encoding load (Experiment 1). However, distraction from a continuously changing sequence of tones (the changing-state effect) was immune to the influence of load (Experiment 2). This dissociation in the amenability of the deviation effect and the changing-state effect to cognitive control supports a duplex-mechanism over a unitary-mechanism account of auditory distraction in which the deviation effect is due to attentional capture whereas the changing-state effect reflects direct interference between the processing of the sound and processes involved in the focal task. That the changing-state effect survives high encoding load also goes against an alternative explanation of the attenuation of the deviation effect under high load in terms of the depletion of a limited perceptual resource that would result in diminished auditory processing. Springer US 2019-07-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6994418/ /pubmed/31290133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01800-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle 40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman
Marsh, John E.
Campbell, Tom A.
Vachon, François
Taylor, Paul J.
Hughes, Robert W.
How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction
title How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction
title_full How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction
title_fullStr How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction
title_full_unstemmed How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction
title_short How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction
title_sort how the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction
topic 40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01800-w
work_keys_str_mv AT marshjohne howthedeploymentofvisualattentionmodulatesauditorydistraction
AT campbelltoma howthedeploymentofvisualattentionmodulatesauditorydistraction
AT vachonfrancois howthedeploymentofvisualattentionmodulatesauditorydistraction
AT taylorpaulj howthedeploymentofvisualattentionmodulatesauditorydistraction
AT hughesrobertw howthedeploymentofvisualattentionmodulatesauditorydistraction