Cargando…
How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction
Classically, attentional selectivity has been conceptualized as a passive by-product of capacity limits on stimulus processing. Here, we examine the role of more active cognitive control processes in attentional selectivity, focusing on how distraction from task-irrelevant sound is modulated by leve...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01800-w |
_version_ | 1783493184786006016 |
---|---|
author | Marsh, John E. Campbell, Tom A. Vachon, François Taylor, Paul J. Hughes, Robert W. |
author_facet | Marsh, John E. Campbell, Tom A. Vachon, François Taylor, Paul J. Hughes, Robert W. |
author_sort | Marsh, John E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Classically, attentional selectivity has been conceptualized as a passive by-product of capacity limits on stimulus processing. Here, we examine the role of more active cognitive control processes in attentional selectivity, focusing on how distraction from task-irrelevant sound is modulated by levels of task engagement in a visually presented short-term memory task. Task engagement was varied by manipulating the load involved in the encoding of the (visually presented) to-be-remembered items. Using a list of Navon letters (where a large letter is composed of smaller, different-identity letters), participants were oriented to attend and serially recall the list of large letters (low encoding load) or to attend and serially recall the list of small letters (high encoding load). Attentional capture by a single deviant noise burst within a task-irrelevant tone sequence (the deviation effect) was eliminated under high encoding load (Experiment 1). However, distraction from a continuously changing sequence of tones (the changing-state effect) was immune to the influence of load (Experiment 2). This dissociation in the amenability of the deviation effect and the changing-state effect to cognitive control supports a duplex-mechanism over a unitary-mechanism account of auditory distraction in which the deviation effect is due to attentional capture whereas the changing-state effect reflects direct interference between the processing of the sound and processes involved in the focal task. That the changing-state effect survives high encoding load also goes against an alternative explanation of the attenuation of the deviation effect under high load in terms of the depletion of a limited perceptual resource that would result in diminished auditory processing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6994418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69944182020-02-14 How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction Marsh, John E. Campbell, Tom A. Vachon, François Taylor, Paul J. Hughes, Robert W. Atten Percept Psychophys 40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman Classically, attentional selectivity has been conceptualized as a passive by-product of capacity limits on stimulus processing. Here, we examine the role of more active cognitive control processes in attentional selectivity, focusing on how distraction from task-irrelevant sound is modulated by levels of task engagement in a visually presented short-term memory task. Task engagement was varied by manipulating the load involved in the encoding of the (visually presented) to-be-remembered items. Using a list of Navon letters (where a large letter is composed of smaller, different-identity letters), participants were oriented to attend and serially recall the list of large letters (low encoding load) or to attend and serially recall the list of small letters (high encoding load). Attentional capture by a single deviant noise burst within a task-irrelevant tone sequence (the deviation effect) was eliminated under high encoding load (Experiment 1). However, distraction from a continuously changing sequence of tones (the changing-state effect) was immune to the influence of load (Experiment 2). This dissociation in the amenability of the deviation effect and the changing-state effect to cognitive control supports a duplex-mechanism over a unitary-mechanism account of auditory distraction in which the deviation effect is due to attentional capture whereas the changing-state effect reflects direct interference between the processing of the sound and processes involved in the focal task. That the changing-state effect survives high encoding load also goes against an alternative explanation of the attenuation of the deviation effect under high load in terms of the depletion of a limited perceptual resource that would result in diminished auditory processing. Springer US 2019-07-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6994418/ /pubmed/31290133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01800-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | 40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman Marsh, John E. Campbell, Tom A. Vachon, François Taylor, Paul J. Hughes, Robert W. How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction |
title | How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction |
title_full | How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction |
title_fullStr | How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction |
title_full_unstemmed | How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction |
title_short | How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction |
title_sort | how the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction |
topic | 40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01800-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marshjohne howthedeploymentofvisualattentionmodulatesauditorydistraction AT campbelltoma howthedeploymentofvisualattentionmodulatesauditorydistraction AT vachonfrancois howthedeploymentofvisualattentionmodulatesauditorydistraction AT taylorpaulj howthedeploymentofvisualattentionmodulatesauditorydistraction AT hughesrobertw howthedeploymentofvisualattentionmodulatesauditorydistraction |