Cargando…

Comparison of Cartilage Mechanical Properties Measured During Creep and Recovery

The diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) currently depends on the presence of pain and radiographic imaging findings, which generally do not present until later stages of the disease when the condition is difficult to treat. Therefore, earlier detection of OA pathology is needed for improved disease man...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cutcliffe, Hattie C., DeFrate, Louis E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58220-2
_version_ 1783493245675765760
author Cutcliffe, Hattie C.
DeFrate, Louis E.
author_facet Cutcliffe, Hattie C.
DeFrate, Louis E.
author_sort Cutcliffe, Hattie C.
collection PubMed
description The diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) currently depends on the presence of pain and radiographic imaging findings, which generally do not present until later stages of the disease when the condition is difficult to treat. Therefore, earlier detection of OA pathology is needed for improved disease management. Ex vivo cartilage studies indicate that changes in the mechanical function of cartilage occur as degeneration progresses during OA. Thus, measurement of the in vivo cartilage mechanical response may serve as an earlier indicator of OA pathology. Though mechanical characterization is classically performed during loading, the unloading (recovery) response of cartilage may also enable determination of mechanical response. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to validate the use of the recovery response for mechanical characterization of cartilage in a controlled, ex vivo environment. To do so, confined compression creep and recovery tests were conducted on cartilage explants (N = 10), and the resulting mechanical properties from both the creep and recovery phases were compared. No statistically significant differences were found in the mechanical properties between the two phases, reinforcing the hypothesis that unloading (recovery) may be a good surrogate for loading.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6994684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69946842020-02-06 Comparison of Cartilage Mechanical Properties Measured During Creep and Recovery Cutcliffe, Hattie C. DeFrate, Louis E. Sci Rep Article The diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) currently depends on the presence of pain and radiographic imaging findings, which generally do not present until later stages of the disease when the condition is difficult to treat. Therefore, earlier detection of OA pathology is needed for improved disease management. Ex vivo cartilage studies indicate that changes in the mechanical function of cartilage occur as degeneration progresses during OA. Thus, measurement of the in vivo cartilage mechanical response may serve as an earlier indicator of OA pathology. Though mechanical characterization is classically performed during loading, the unloading (recovery) response of cartilage may also enable determination of mechanical response. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to validate the use of the recovery response for mechanical characterization of cartilage in a controlled, ex vivo environment. To do so, confined compression creep and recovery tests were conducted on cartilage explants (N = 10), and the resulting mechanical properties from both the creep and recovery phases were compared. No statistically significant differences were found in the mechanical properties between the two phases, reinforcing the hypothesis that unloading (recovery) may be a good surrogate for loading. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6994684/ /pubmed/32005844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58220-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Cutcliffe, Hattie C.
DeFrate, Louis E.
Comparison of Cartilage Mechanical Properties Measured During Creep and Recovery
title Comparison of Cartilage Mechanical Properties Measured During Creep and Recovery
title_full Comparison of Cartilage Mechanical Properties Measured During Creep and Recovery
title_fullStr Comparison of Cartilage Mechanical Properties Measured During Creep and Recovery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cartilage Mechanical Properties Measured During Creep and Recovery
title_short Comparison of Cartilage Mechanical Properties Measured During Creep and Recovery
title_sort comparison of cartilage mechanical properties measured during creep and recovery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58220-2
work_keys_str_mv AT cutcliffehattiec comparisonofcartilagemechanicalpropertiesmeasuredduringcreepandrecovery
AT defratelouise comparisonofcartilagemechanicalpropertiesmeasuredduringcreepandrecovery