Cargando…
(68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors
OBJECTIVE(S): (68)Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has shown promising results in imaging of neural crest tumors (NCT). Herein, we compared the performance of (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in the in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064278 http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2019.41343.1280 |
_version_ | 1783493258717954048 |
---|---|
author | Shahrokhi, Pezhman Emami-Ardekani, Alireza Harsini, Sara Eftekhari, Mohammad Fard-Esfahani, Armaghan Fallahi, Babak Karamzade Ziarati, Najme Akhlaghi, Mehdi Farzanefar, Saeed Hashemi Taheri, Amir Pejman Beiki, Davood |
author_facet | Shahrokhi, Pezhman Emami-Ardekani, Alireza Harsini, Sara Eftekhari, Mohammad Fard-Esfahani, Armaghan Fallahi, Babak Karamzade Ziarati, Najme Akhlaghi, Mehdi Farzanefar, Saeed Hashemi Taheri, Amir Pejman Beiki, Davood |
author_sort | Shahrokhi, Pezhman |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE(S): (68)Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has shown promising results in imaging of neural crest tumors (NCT). Herein, we compared the performance of (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in the initial diagnosis, staging and follow-up of patients with NCTs. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (males:females=8:17; age range=2–71 years) with clinically proven or suspicious neuroblastoma, pheochromocytoma (PCC) or paraganglioma (PGL) were enrolled in this prospective study and underwent both (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT. A composite reference standard derived from histopathological information, together with anatomical and functional imaging findings, was used to validate the results. Imaging findings were assessed on a per-patient and on a per-lesion basis. Sensitivity and accuracy were assessed using McNemar’s test. RESULTS: Referring to radiological imaging and histopathological findings as reference standard, (68)Ga-DOTATATE and (131)I-MIBG scans showed a sensitivity and accuracy of (100%, 96%) and (86.7%, 88%), respectively, on a per-patient basis. In PCC/PGL patients, on a per-patient basis, the sensitivity of (68)Ga-DOTATATE was 100% and that of (131)I-MIBG was 77.8%. In neuroblastoma patients, on a per-patient basis, the sensitivities of both (68)Ga-DOTATATE and (131)I-MIBG were 100%. Overall, in this patient cohort, (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT identified 52 lesions and (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT identified only 30 lesions. On a per-lesion analysis, (68)Ga-DOTATATE was found to be superior to (131)I-MIBG in detecting lesions in all anatomical locations, particularly osseous lesions. According to the McNemar test results, differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This relatively small patient cohort suggests (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT be superior to (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in providing particularly valuable information for both primary staging and follow-up in patients with NCT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6994775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Mashhad University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69947752020-02-14 (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors Shahrokhi, Pezhman Emami-Ardekani, Alireza Harsini, Sara Eftekhari, Mohammad Fard-Esfahani, Armaghan Fallahi, Babak Karamzade Ziarati, Najme Akhlaghi, Mehdi Farzanefar, Saeed Hashemi Taheri, Amir Pejman Beiki, Davood Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol Original Article OBJECTIVE(S): (68)Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has shown promising results in imaging of neural crest tumors (NCT). Herein, we compared the performance of (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in the initial diagnosis, staging and follow-up of patients with NCTs. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (males:females=8:17; age range=2–71 years) with clinically proven or suspicious neuroblastoma, pheochromocytoma (PCC) or paraganglioma (PGL) were enrolled in this prospective study and underwent both (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT. A composite reference standard derived from histopathological information, together with anatomical and functional imaging findings, was used to validate the results. Imaging findings were assessed on a per-patient and on a per-lesion basis. Sensitivity and accuracy were assessed using McNemar’s test. RESULTS: Referring to radiological imaging and histopathological findings as reference standard, (68)Ga-DOTATATE and (131)I-MIBG scans showed a sensitivity and accuracy of (100%, 96%) and (86.7%, 88%), respectively, on a per-patient basis. In PCC/PGL patients, on a per-patient basis, the sensitivity of (68)Ga-DOTATATE was 100% and that of (131)I-MIBG was 77.8%. In neuroblastoma patients, on a per-patient basis, the sensitivities of both (68)Ga-DOTATATE and (131)I-MIBG were 100%. Overall, in this patient cohort, (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT identified 52 lesions and (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT identified only 30 lesions. On a per-lesion analysis, (68)Ga-DOTATATE was found to be superior to (131)I-MIBG in detecting lesions in all anatomical locations, particularly osseous lesions. According to the McNemar test results, differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This relatively small patient cohort suggests (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT be superior to (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in providing particularly valuable information for both primary staging and follow-up in patients with NCT. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6994775/ /pubmed/32064278 http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2019.41343.1280 Text en © 2020 mums.ac.ir All rights reserved This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shahrokhi, Pezhman Emami-Ardekani, Alireza Harsini, Sara Eftekhari, Mohammad Fard-Esfahani, Armaghan Fallahi, Babak Karamzade Ziarati, Najme Akhlaghi, Mehdi Farzanefar, Saeed Hashemi Taheri, Amir Pejman Beiki, Davood (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors |
title |
(68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors |
title_full |
(68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors |
title_fullStr |
(68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors |
title_full_unstemmed |
(68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors |
title_short |
(68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors |
title_sort | (68)ga-dotatate pet/ct compared with (131)i-mibg spect/ct in the evaluation of neural crest tumors |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064278 http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2019.41343.1280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahrokhipezhman 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors AT emamiardekanialireza 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors AT harsinisara 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors AT eftekharimohammad 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors AT fardesfahaniarmaghan 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors AT fallahibabak 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors AT karamzadeziaratinajme 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors AT akhlaghimehdi 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors AT farzanefarsaeed 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors AT hashemitaheriamirpejman 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors AT beikidavood 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors |