Cargando…

(68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors

OBJECTIVE(S): (68)Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has shown promising results in imaging of neural crest tumors (NCT). Herein, we compared the performance of (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in the in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahrokhi, Pezhman, Emami-Ardekani, Alireza, Harsini, Sara, Eftekhari, Mohammad, Fard-Esfahani, Armaghan, Fallahi, Babak, Karamzade Ziarati, Najme, Akhlaghi, Mehdi, Farzanefar, Saeed, Hashemi Taheri, Amir Pejman, Beiki, Davood
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064278
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2019.41343.1280
_version_ 1783493258717954048
author Shahrokhi, Pezhman
Emami-Ardekani, Alireza
Harsini, Sara
Eftekhari, Mohammad
Fard-Esfahani, Armaghan
Fallahi, Babak
Karamzade Ziarati, Najme
Akhlaghi, Mehdi
Farzanefar, Saeed
Hashemi Taheri, Amir Pejman
Beiki, Davood
author_facet Shahrokhi, Pezhman
Emami-Ardekani, Alireza
Harsini, Sara
Eftekhari, Mohammad
Fard-Esfahani, Armaghan
Fallahi, Babak
Karamzade Ziarati, Najme
Akhlaghi, Mehdi
Farzanefar, Saeed
Hashemi Taheri, Amir Pejman
Beiki, Davood
author_sort Shahrokhi, Pezhman
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE(S): (68)Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has shown promising results in imaging of neural crest tumors (NCT). Herein, we compared the performance of (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in the initial diagnosis, staging and follow-up of patients with NCTs. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (males:females=8:17; age range=2–71 years) with clinically proven or suspicious neuroblastoma, pheochromocytoma (PCC) or paraganglioma (PGL) were enrolled in this prospective study and underwent both (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT. A composite reference standard derived from histopathological information, together with anatomical and functional imaging findings, was used to validate the results. Imaging findings were assessed on a per-patient and on a per-lesion basis. Sensitivity and accuracy were assessed using McNemar’s test. RESULTS: Referring to radiological imaging and histopathological findings as reference standard, (68)Ga-DOTATATE and (131)I-MIBG scans showed a sensitivity and accuracy of (100%, 96%) and (86.7%, 88%), respectively, on a per-patient basis. In PCC/PGL patients, on a per-patient basis, the sensitivity of (68)Ga-DOTATATE was 100% and that of (131)I-MIBG was 77.8%. In neuroblastoma patients, on a per-patient basis, the sensitivities of both (68)Ga-DOTATATE and (131)I-MIBG were 100%. Overall, in this patient cohort, (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT identified 52 lesions and (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT identified only 30 lesions. On a per-lesion analysis, (68)Ga-DOTATATE was found to be superior to (131)I-MIBG in detecting lesions in all anatomical locations, particularly osseous lesions. According to the McNemar test results, differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This relatively small patient cohort suggests (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT be superior to (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in providing particularly valuable information for both primary staging and follow-up in patients with NCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6994775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69947752020-02-14 (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors Shahrokhi, Pezhman Emami-Ardekani, Alireza Harsini, Sara Eftekhari, Mohammad Fard-Esfahani, Armaghan Fallahi, Babak Karamzade Ziarati, Najme Akhlaghi, Mehdi Farzanefar, Saeed Hashemi Taheri, Amir Pejman Beiki, Davood Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol Original Article OBJECTIVE(S): (68)Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has shown promising results in imaging of neural crest tumors (NCT). Herein, we compared the performance of (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in the initial diagnosis, staging and follow-up of patients with NCTs. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (males:females=8:17; age range=2–71 years) with clinically proven or suspicious neuroblastoma, pheochromocytoma (PCC) or paraganglioma (PGL) were enrolled in this prospective study and underwent both (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT. A composite reference standard derived from histopathological information, together with anatomical and functional imaging findings, was used to validate the results. Imaging findings were assessed on a per-patient and on a per-lesion basis. Sensitivity and accuracy were assessed using McNemar’s test. RESULTS: Referring to radiological imaging and histopathological findings as reference standard, (68)Ga-DOTATATE and (131)I-MIBG scans showed a sensitivity and accuracy of (100%, 96%) and (86.7%, 88%), respectively, on a per-patient basis. In PCC/PGL patients, on a per-patient basis, the sensitivity of (68)Ga-DOTATATE was 100% and that of (131)I-MIBG was 77.8%. In neuroblastoma patients, on a per-patient basis, the sensitivities of both (68)Ga-DOTATATE and (131)I-MIBG were 100%. Overall, in this patient cohort, (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT identified 52 lesions and (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT identified only 30 lesions. On a per-lesion analysis, (68)Ga-DOTATATE was found to be superior to (131)I-MIBG in detecting lesions in all anatomical locations, particularly osseous lesions. According to the McNemar test results, differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This relatively small patient cohort suggests (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT be superior to (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in providing particularly valuable information for both primary staging and follow-up in patients with NCT. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6994775/ /pubmed/32064278 http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2019.41343.1280 Text en © 2020 mums.ac.ir All rights reserved This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shahrokhi, Pezhman
Emami-Ardekani, Alireza
Harsini, Sara
Eftekhari, Mohammad
Fard-Esfahani, Armaghan
Fallahi, Babak
Karamzade Ziarati, Najme
Akhlaghi, Mehdi
Farzanefar, Saeed
Hashemi Taheri, Amir Pejman
Beiki, Davood
(68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors
title (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors
title_full (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors
title_fullStr (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors
title_full_unstemmed (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors
title_short (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Compared with (131)I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Neural Crest Tumors
title_sort (68)ga-dotatate pet/ct compared with (131)i-mibg spect/ct in the evaluation of neural crest tumors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064278
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2019.41343.1280
work_keys_str_mv AT shahrokhipezhman 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors
AT emamiardekanialireza 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors
AT harsinisara 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors
AT eftekharimohammad 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors
AT fardesfahaniarmaghan 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors
AT fallahibabak 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors
AT karamzadeziaratinajme 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors
AT akhlaghimehdi 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors
AT farzanefarsaeed 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors
AT hashemitaheriamirpejman 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors
AT beikidavood 68gadotatatepetctcomparedwith131imibgspectctintheevaluationofneuralcresttumors