Cargando…

Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ideal method for postoperative pain management after circumcision by comparing the most frequently used different methods like; dorsal penile block, caudal epidural block, subcutaneous ring block, intravenous paracetamol and intravenous tramadol HCl. METHODS: Between May...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munevveroglu, Caglar, Gunduz, Mehmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32063938
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.505
_version_ 1783493275496218624
author Munevveroglu, Caglar
Gunduz, Mehmet
author_facet Munevveroglu, Caglar
Gunduz, Mehmet
author_sort Munevveroglu, Caglar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the ideal method for postoperative pain management after circumcision by comparing the most frequently used different methods like; dorsal penile block, caudal epidural block, subcutaneous ring block, intravenous paracetamol and intravenous tramadol HCl. METHODS: Between May 1(st) 2015 to May 1(st) 2016, 500 children between 2-10 year old were circumcised at the department of pediatric surgery of Istanbul Medipol University Health Care Practice & Research Center Sefakoy Hospital. Five groups were formed according to postoperative analgesia methods which were planned to be compared; Group-I. penile block, Group-II. Caudal epidural block, Group-III. subcutaneous ring block, Group-IV as intravenous paracetamol and Group-V as intravenous tramadol HCl. In order to evaluate the postoperative pain levels of children, Children’s Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) was filled at 30, 60, 120, 180 minutes after circumcision by a researcher who does not know which method was applied. RESULTS: No significant difference is found between the groups (p>0.05). In the statistical analysis, no significant difference was found in the effect of analgesia methods on CHEOPS scores between 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes (p>0.05). In parallel with this result, no significant difference was found in the effect of heart beat rates and respiration rate averages between 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: It has been shown that none of the five method has any superiority in reducing pain after circumcision and that all five methods can be used. However, we think that side effects of regional anesthesia and systemic analgesic applications should not be ignored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6994883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69948832020-02-14 Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods Munevveroglu, Caglar Gunduz, Mehmet Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the ideal method for postoperative pain management after circumcision by comparing the most frequently used different methods like; dorsal penile block, caudal epidural block, subcutaneous ring block, intravenous paracetamol and intravenous tramadol HCl. METHODS: Between May 1(st) 2015 to May 1(st) 2016, 500 children between 2-10 year old were circumcised at the department of pediatric surgery of Istanbul Medipol University Health Care Practice & Research Center Sefakoy Hospital. Five groups were formed according to postoperative analgesia methods which were planned to be compared; Group-I. penile block, Group-II. Caudal epidural block, Group-III. subcutaneous ring block, Group-IV as intravenous paracetamol and Group-V as intravenous tramadol HCl. In order to evaluate the postoperative pain levels of children, Children’s Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) was filled at 30, 60, 120, 180 minutes after circumcision by a researcher who does not know which method was applied. RESULTS: No significant difference is found between the groups (p>0.05). In the statistical analysis, no significant difference was found in the effect of analgesia methods on CHEOPS scores between 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes (p>0.05). In parallel with this result, no significant difference was found in the effect of heart beat rates and respiration rate averages between 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: It has been shown that none of the five method has any superiority in reducing pain after circumcision and that all five methods can be used. However, we think that side effects of regional anesthesia and systemic analgesic applications should not be ignored. Professional Medical Publications 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6994883/ /pubmed/32063938 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.505 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Munevveroglu, Caglar
Gunduz, Mehmet
Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods
title Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods
title_full Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods
title_fullStr Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods
title_short Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods
title_sort postoperative pain management for circumcision; comparison of frequently used methods
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6994883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32063938
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.505
work_keys_str_mv AT munevveroglucaglar postoperativepainmanagementforcircumcisioncomparisonoffrequentlyusedmethods
AT gunduzmehmet postoperativepainmanagementforcircumcisioncomparisonoffrequentlyusedmethods