Cargando…
Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners
BACKGROUND: The Equal North network was developed to take forward the implications of the Due North report of the Independent Inquiry into Health Equity. The aim of this exercise was to identify how to reduce health inequalities in the north of England. METHODS: Workshops (15 groups) and a Delphi su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30346563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy170 |
_version_ | 1783493301363539968 |
---|---|
author | Addison, M Kaner, E Johnstone, P Hillier-Brown, F Moffatt, S Russell, S Barr, B Holland, P Salway, S Whitehead, M Bambra, C |
author_facet | Addison, M Kaner, E Johnstone, P Hillier-Brown, F Moffatt, S Russell, S Barr, B Holland, P Salway, S Whitehead, M Bambra, C |
author_sort | Addison, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Equal North network was developed to take forward the implications of the Due North report of the Independent Inquiry into Health Equity. The aim of this exercise was to identify how to reduce health inequalities in the north of England. METHODS: Workshops (15 groups) and a Delphi survey (3 rounds, 368 members) were used to consult expert opinion and achieve consensus. Round 1 answered open questions around priorities for action; Round 2 used a 5-point Likert scale to rate items; Round 3 responses were re-rated alongside a median response to each item. In total, 10 workshops were conducted after the Delphi survey to triangulate the data. RESULTS: In Round 1, responses from 253 participants generated 39 items used in Round 2 (rated by 144 participants). Results from Round 3 (76 participants) indicate that poverty/implications of austerity (4.87 m, IQR 0) remained the priority issue, with long-term unemployment (4.8 m, IQR 0) and mental health (4.7 m, IQR 1) second and third priorities. Workshop 3 did not diverge from findings in Round 1. CONCLUSIONS: Practice professionals and academics agreed that reducing health inequalities in the North of England requires prioritizing research that tackles structural determinants concerning poverty, the implications of austerity measures and unemployment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6995035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69950352020-02-05 Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners Addison, M Kaner, E Johnstone, P Hillier-Brown, F Moffatt, S Russell, S Barr, B Holland, P Salway, S Whitehead, M Bambra, C J Public Health (Oxf) Original Article BACKGROUND: The Equal North network was developed to take forward the implications of the Due North report of the Independent Inquiry into Health Equity. The aim of this exercise was to identify how to reduce health inequalities in the north of England. METHODS: Workshops (15 groups) and a Delphi survey (3 rounds, 368 members) were used to consult expert opinion and achieve consensus. Round 1 answered open questions around priorities for action; Round 2 used a 5-point Likert scale to rate items; Round 3 responses were re-rated alongside a median response to each item. In total, 10 workshops were conducted after the Delphi survey to triangulate the data. RESULTS: In Round 1, responses from 253 participants generated 39 items used in Round 2 (rated by 144 participants). Results from Round 3 (76 participants) indicate that poverty/implications of austerity (4.87 m, IQR 0) remained the priority issue, with long-term unemployment (4.8 m, IQR 0) and mental health (4.7 m, IQR 1) second and third priorities. Workshop 3 did not diverge from findings in Round 1. CONCLUSIONS: Practice professionals and academics agreed that reducing health inequalities in the North of England requires prioritizing research that tackles structural determinants concerning poverty, the implications of austerity measures and unemployment. Oxford University Press 2019-12 2018-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6995035/ /pubmed/30346563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy170 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Addison, M Kaner, E Johnstone, P Hillier-Brown, F Moffatt, S Russell, S Barr, B Holland, P Salway, S Whitehead, M Bambra, C Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners |
title | Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners |
title_full | Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners |
title_fullStr | Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners |
title_full_unstemmed | Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners |
title_short | Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners |
title_sort | equal north: how can we reduce health inequalities in the north of england? a prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30346563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT addisonm equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners AT kanere equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners AT johnstonep equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners AT hillierbrownf equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners AT moffatts equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners AT russells equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners AT barrb equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners AT hollandp equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners AT salways equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners AT whiteheadm equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners AT bambrac equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners |