Cargando…

Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners

BACKGROUND: The Equal North network was developed to take forward the implications of the Due North report of the Independent Inquiry into Health Equity. The aim of this exercise was to identify how to reduce health inequalities in the north of England. METHODS: Workshops (15 groups) and a Delphi su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Addison, M, Kaner, E, Johnstone, P, Hillier-Brown, F, Moffatt, S, Russell, S, Barr, B, Holland, P, Salway, S, Whitehead, M, Bambra, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30346563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy170
_version_ 1783493301363539968
author Addison, M
Kaner, E
Johnstone, P
Hillier-Brown, F
Moffatt, S
Russell, S
Barr, B
Holland, P
Salway, S
Whitehead, M
Bambra, C
author_facet Addison, M
Kaner, E
Johnstone, P
Hillier-Brown, F
Moffatt, S
Russell, S
Barr, B
Holland, P
Salway, S
Whitehead, M
Bambra, C
author_sort Addison, M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Equal North network was developed to take forward the implications of the Due North report of the Independent Inquiry into Health Equity. The aim of this exercise was to identify how to reduce health inequalities in the north of England. METHODS: Workshops (15 groups) and a Delphi survey (3 rounds, 368 members) were used to consult expert opinion and achieve consensus. Round 1 answered open questions around priorities for action; Round 2 used a 5-point Likert scale to rate items; Round 3 responses were re-rated alongside a median response to each item. In total, 10 workshops were conducted after the Delphi survey to triangulate the data. RESULTS: In Round 1, responses from 253 participants generated 39 items used in Round 2 (rated by 144 participants). Results from Round 3 (76 participants) indicate that poverty/implications of austerity (4.87 m, IQR 0) remained the priority issue, with long-term unemployment (4.8 m, IQR 0) and mental health (4.7 m, IQR 1) second and third priorities. Workshop 3 did not diverge from findings in Round 1. CONCLUSIONS: Practice professionals and academics agreed that reducing health inequalities in the North of England requires prioritizing research that tackles structural determinants concerning poverty, the implications of austerity measures and unemployment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6995035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69950352020-02-05 Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners Addison, M Kaner, E Johnstone, P Hillier-Brown, F Moffatt, S Russell, S Barr, B Holland, P Salway, S Whitehead, M Bambra, C J Public Health (Oxf) Original Article BACKGROUND: The Equal North network was developed to take forward the implications of the Due North report of the Independent Inquiry into Health Equity. The aim of this exercise was to identify how to reduce health inequalities in the north of England. METHODS: Workshops (15 groups) and a Delphi survey (3 rounds, 368 members) were used to consult expert opinion and achieve consensus. Round 1 answered open questions around priorities for action; Round 2 used a 5-point Likert scale to rate items; Round 3 responses were re-rated alongside a median response to each item. In total, 10 workshops were conducted after the Delphi survey to triangulate the data. RESULTS: In Round 1, responses from 253 participants generated 39 items used in Round 2 (rated by 144 participants). Results from Round 3 (76 participants) indicate that poverty/implications of austerity (4.87 m, IQR 0) remained the priority issue, with long-term unemployment (4.8 m, IQR 0) and mental health (4.7 m, IQR 1) second and third priorities. Workshop 3 did not diverge from findings in Round 1. CONCLUSIONS: Practice professionals and academics agreed that reducing health inequalities in the North of England requires prioritizing research that tackles structural determinants concerning poverty, the implications of austerity measures and unemployment. Oxford University Press 2019-12 2018-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6995035/ /pubmed/30346563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy170 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Addison, M
Kaner, E
Johnstone, P
Hillier-Brown, F
Moffatt, S
Russell, S
Barr, B
Holland, P
Salway, S
Whitehead, M
Bambra, C
Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners
title Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners
title_full Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners
title_fullStr Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners
title_short Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners
title_sort equal north: how can we reduce health inequalities in the north of england? a prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30346563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy170
work_keys_str_mv AT addisonm equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners
AT kanere equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners
AT johnstonep equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners
AT hillierbrownf equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners
AT moffatts equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners
AT russells equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners
AT barrb equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners
AT hollandp equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners
AT salways equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners
AT whiteheadm equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners
AT bambrac equalnorthhowcanwereducehealthinequalitiesinthenorthofenglandaprioritizationexercisewithresearcherspolicymakersandpractitioners