Cargando…

Transverse versus vertical skin incision for planned cesarean hysterectomy: does it matter?

BACKGROUND: To investigate differences in perioperative outcomes by type of skin incision, transverse versus vertical, for planned cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all women who underwent a planned cesarean hysterectomy for abnormal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szlachta-McGinn, Alec, Mei, Jenny, Tabsh, Khalil, Afshar, Yalda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2768-7
_version_ 1783493318224642048
author Szlachta-McGinn, Alec
Mei, Jenny
Tabsh, Khalil
Afshar, Yalda
author_facet Szlachta-McGinn, Alec
Mei, Jenny
Tabsh, Khalil
Afshar, Yalda
author_sort Szlachta-McGinn, Alec
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate differences in perioperative outcomes by type of skin incision, transverse versus vertical, for planned cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all women who underwent a planned cesarean hysterectomy for abnormal placentation at a single academic medical center over 5 years. The Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test compared categorical variables. Continuous data were presented as median and compared using the Wilcoxon-rank sum test. RESULTS: Forty-two planned cesarean hysterectomies were identified. A transverse skin incision was made in 43% (n = 18); a vertical skin incision was made in 57% (n = 24). Skin incision was independent of BMI (30.3 vs 30.8 kg/m(2), p = 0.37), placental location (p = 0.82), and PAS-subtype (p = 0.26). Mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 2.73 l (L) (range 0.5–20) and was not significantly different between transverse and vertical skin incision (2.6 L vs 2.8 L, p = 0.8). There was significantly shorter operative time with transverse skin incision (180 vs 238 min, p = 0.03), with no difference in intraoperative complications, including cystotomy (p = 0.22) and ureteral injury (p = 0.73). Postoperatively, there was no difference in maternal length of stay (4.8 vs 4.4 days, p = 0.74) or post-operative opioid use (117 vs 180 morphine equivalents, p = 0.31). CONCLUSION: Transverse skin incision is associated with shorter operative time for patients undergoing planned cesarean hysterectomy. There was no difference in EBL, intraoperative complications, postoperative length of stay, or opioid use. Given an increasing rate of cesarean hysterectomy, we should consider variables that optimize maternal outcomes and resource utilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6995109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69951092020-02-04 Transverse versus vertical skin incision for planned cesarean hysterectomy: does it matter? Szlachta-McGinn, Alec Mei, Jenny Tabsh, Khalil Afshar, Yalda BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: To investigate differences in perioperative outcomes by type of skin incision, transverse versus vertical, for planned cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all women who underwent a planned cesarean hysterectomy for abnormal placentation at a single academic medical center over 5 years. The Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test compared categorical variables. Continuous data were presented as median and compared using the Wilcoxon-rank sum test. RESULTS: Forty-two planned cesarean hysterectomies were identified. A transverse skin incision was made in 43% (n = 18); a vertical skin incision was made in 57% (n = 24). Skin incision was independent of BMI (30.3 vs 30.8 kg/m(2), p = 0.37), placental location (p = 0.82), and PAS-subtype (p = 0.26). Mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 2.73 l (L) (range 0.5–20) and was not significantly different between transverse and vertical skin incision (2.6 L vs 2.8 L, p = 0.8). There was significantly shorter operative time with transverse skin incision (180 vs 238 min, p = 0.03), with no difference in intraoperative complications, including cystotomy (p = 0.22) and ureteral injury (p = 0.73). Postoperatively, there was no difference in maternal length of stay (4.8 vs 4.4 days, p = 0.74) or post-operative opioid use (117 vs 180 morphine equivalents, p = 0.31). CONCLUSION: Transverse skin incision is associated with shorter operative time for patients undergoing planned cesarean hysterectomy. There was no difference in EBL, intraoperative complications, postoperative length of stay, or opioid use. Given an increasing rate of cesarean hysterectomy, we should consider variables that optimize maternal outcomes and resource utilization. BioMed Central 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6995109/ /pubmed/32005190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2768-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Szlachta-McGinn, Alec
Mei, Jenny
Tabsh, Khalil
Afshar, Yalda
Transverse versus vertical skin incision for planned cesarean hysterectomy: does it matter?
title Transverse versus vertical skin incision for planned cesarean hysterectomy: does it matter?
title_full Transverse versus vertical skin incision for planned cesarean hysterectomy: does it matter?
title_fullStr Transverse versus vertical skin incision for planned cesarean hysterectomy: does it matter?
title_full_unstemmed Transverse versus vertical skin incision for planned cesarean hysterectomy: does it matter?
title_short Transverse versus vertical skin incision for planned cesarean hysterectomy: does it matter?
title_sort transverse versus vertical skin incision for planned cesarean hysterectomy: does it matter?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2768-7
work_keys_str_mv AT szlachtamcginnalec transverseversusverticalskinincisionforplannedcesareanhysterectomydoesitmatter
AT meijenny transverseversusverticalskinincisionforplannedcesareanhysterectomydoesitmatter
AT tabshkhalil transverseversusverticalskinincisionforplannedcesareanhysterectomydoesitmatter
AT afsharyalda transverseversusverticalskinincisionforplannedcesareanhysterectomydoesitmatter