Cargando…

Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study

BACKGROUND: Both Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Continuous intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) are effective therapies for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). To our knowledge, no direct head-to-head comparison of DBS and CLI has been performed, whilst the costs probably differ significant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Poppelen, D., Sisodia, V., de Haan, R. J., Dijkgraaf, M. G. W., Schuurman, P. R., Geurtsen, G. J., Berk, A. E. M., de Bie, R. M. A., Dijk, J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1621-y
_version_ 1783493322301505536
author van Poppelen, D.
Sisodia, V.
de Haan, R. J.
Dijkgraaf, M. G. W.
Schuurman, P. R.
Geurtsen, G. J.
Berk, A. E. M.
de Bie, R. M. A.
Dijk, J. M.
author_facet van Poppelen, D.
Sisodia, V.
de Haan, R. J.
Dijkgraaf, M. G. W.
Schuurman, P. R.
Geurtsen, G. J.
Berk, A. E. M.
de Bie, R. M. A.
Dijk, J. M.
author_sort van Poppelen, D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Continuous intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) are effective therapies for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). To our knowledge, no direct head-to-head comparison of DBS and CLI has been performed, whilst the costs probably differ significantly. In the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study, costs and effectiveness of DBS and CLI are compared in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in patients with PD, to study whether higher costs of one of the therapies are justified by superiority of that treatment. METHODS: A prospective open label multicentre RCT is being performed, with ancillary patient preference observational arms. Patients with PD who, despite optimal pharmacological treatment, have severe response fluctuations, bradykinesia, dyskinesias, or painful dystonia are eligible for inclusion. A total of 66 patients will be randomized. There is no minimal inclusion in the patient preference arms. The primary health economic outcomes are costs per unit on the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) and costs per unit Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) at 12 months. The main clinical outcome is patient-reported quality of life measured with the PDQ-39 at 12 months. Patients will additionally be followed during 36 months after initiation of the study treatment. DISCUSSION: The INVEST trial directly compares the costs and effectiveness of the advanced therapies DBS and CLI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register identifier 4753, registered November 3rd, 2014; EudraCT number 2014–001501-32, Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02480803.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6995127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69951272020-02-04 Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study van Poppelen, D. Sisodia, V. de Haan, R. J. Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. Schuurman, P. R. Geurtsen, G. J. Berk, A. E. M. de Bie, R. M. A. Dijk, J. M. BMC Neurol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Both Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Continuous intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) are effective therapies for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). To our knowledge, no direct head-to-head comparison of DBS and CLI has been performed, whilst the costs probably differ significantly. In the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study, costs and effectiveness of DBS and CLI are compared in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in patients with PD, to study whether higher costs of one of the therapies are justified by superiority of that treatment. METHODS: A prospective open label multicentre RCT is being performed, with ancillary patient preference observational arms. Patients with PD who, despite optimal pharmacological treatment, have severe response fluctuations, bradykinesia, dyskinesias, or painful dystonia are eligible for inclusion. A total of 66 patients will be randomized. There is no minimal inclusion in the patient preference arms. The primary health economic outcomes are costs per unit on the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) and costs per unit Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) at 12 months. The main clinical outcome is patient-reported quality of life measured with the PDQ-39 at 12 months. Patients will additionally be followed during 36 months after initiation of the study treatment. DISCUSSION: The INVEST trial directly compares the costs and effectiveness of the advanced therapies DBS and CLI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register identifier 4753, registered November 3rd, 2014; EudraCT number 2014–001501-32, Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02480803. BioMed Central 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6995127/ /pubmed/32005175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1621-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van Poppelen, D.
Sisodia, V.
de Haan, R. J.
Dijkgraaf, M. G. W.
Schuurman, P. R.
Geurtsen, G. J.
Berk, A. E. M.
de Bie, R. M. A.
Dijk, J. M.
Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study
title Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study
title_full Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study
title_fullStr Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study
title_full_unstemmed Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study
title_short Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study
title_sort protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in parkinson’s disease - the infusion versus stimulation (invest) study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1621-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vanpoppelend protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy
AT sisodiav protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy
AT dehaanrj protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy
AT dijkgraafmgw protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy
AT schuurmanpr protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy
AT geurtsengj protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy
AT berkaem protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy
AT debierma protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy
AT dijkjm protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy