Cargando…
Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study
BACKGROUND: Both Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Continuous intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) are effective therapies for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). To our knowledge, no direct head-to-head comparison of DBS and CLI has been performed, whilst the costs probably differ significant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1621-y |
_version_ | 1783493322301505536 |
---|---|
author | van Poppelen, D. Sisodia, V. de Haan, R. J. Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. Schuurman, P. R. Geurtsen, G. J. Berk, A. E. M. de Bie, R. M. A. Dijk, J. M. |
author_facet | van Poppelen, D. Sisodia, V. de Haan, R. J. Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. Schuurman, P. R. Geurtsen, G. J. Berk, A. E. M. de Bie, R. M. A. Dijk, J. M. |
author_sort | van Poppelen, D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Both Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Continuous intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) are effective therapies for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). To our knowledge, no direct head-to-head comparison of DBS and CLI has been performed, whilst the costs probably differ significantly. In the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study, costs and effectiveness of DBS and CLI are compared in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in patients with PD, to study whether higher costs of one of the therapies are justified by superiority of that treatment. METHODS: A prospective open label multicentre RCT is being performed, with ancillary patient preference observational arms. Patients with PD who, despite optimal pharmacological treatment, have severe response fluctuations, bradykinesia, dyskinesias, or painful dystonia are eligible for inclusion. A total of 66 patients will be randomized. There is no minimal inclusion in the patient preference arms. The primary health economic outcomes are costs per unit on the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) and costs per unit Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) at 12 months. The main clinical outcome is patient-reported quality of life measured with the PDQ-39 at 12 months. Patients will additionally be followed during 36 months after initiation of the study treatment. DISCUSSION: The INVEST trial directly compares the costs and effectiveness of the advanced therapies DBS and CLI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register identifier 4753, registered November 3rd, 2014; EudraCT number 2014–001501-32, Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02480803. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6995127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69951272020-02-04 Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study van Poppelen, D. Sisodia, V. de Haan, R. J. Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. Schuurman, P. R. Geurtsen, G. J. Berk, A. E. M. de Bie, R. M. A. Dijk, J. M. BMC Neurol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Both Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Continuous intrajejunal Levodopa Infusion (CLI) are effective therapies for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). To our knowledge, no direct head-to-head comparison of DBS and CLI has been performed, whilst the costs probably differ significantly. In the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study, costs and effectiveness of DBS and CLI are compared in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in patients with PD, to study whether higher costs of one of the therapies are justified by superiority of that treatment. METHODS: A prospective open label multicentre RCT is being performed, with ancillary patient preference observational arms. Patients with PD who, despite optimal pharmacological treatment, have severe response fluctuations, bradykinesia, dyskinesias, or painful dystonia are eligible for inclusion. A total of 66 patients will be randomized. There is no minimal inclusion in the patient preference arms. The primary health economic outcomes are costs per unit on the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) and costs per unit Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) at 12 months. The main clinical outcome is patient-reported quality of life measured with the PDQ-39 at 12 months. Patients will additionally be followed during 36 months after initiation of the study treatment. DISCUSSION: The INVEST trial directly compares the costs and effectiveness of the advanced therapies DBS and CLI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register identifier 4753, registered November 3rd, 2014; EudraCT number 2014–001501-32, Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02480803. BioMed Central 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6995127/ /pubmed/32005175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1621-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol van Poppelen, D. Sisodia, V. de Haan, R. J. Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. Schuurman, P. R. Geurtsen, G. J. Berk, A. E. M. de Bie, R. M. A. Dijk, J. M. Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study |
title | Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study |
title_full | Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study |
title_fullStr | Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study |
title_short | Protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease - the INfusion VErsus STimulation (INVEST) study |
title_sort | protocol of a randomized open label multicentre trial comparing continuous intrajejunal levodopa infusion with deep brain stimulation in parkinson’s disease - the infusion versus stimulation (invest) study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1621-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanpoppelend protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy AT sisodiav protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy AT dehaanrj protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy AT dijkgraafmgw protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy AT schuurmanpr protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy AT geurtsengj protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy AT berkaem protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy AT debierma protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy AT dijkjm protocolofarandomizedopenlabelmulticentretrialcomparingcontinuousintrajejunallevodopainfusionwithdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseasetheinfusionversusstimulationinveststudy |