Cargando…
Marginal bone resorption of posterior mandible dental implants with different insertion methods
BACKGROUND: To evaluated the marginal bone loss around dental implants by two insertion methods. METHODS: Eligible patients were divided into two groups; manual and mechanized groups. Peri-apical x-ray using a customized device to standardize the radiographs designed and used to take three periodica...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1019-7 |
_version_ | 1783493348543168512 |
---|---|
author | Aliabadi, Ehsan Tavanafar, Saeid Khaghaninejad, Mohammad Saleh |
author_facet | Aliabadi, Ehsan Tavanafar, Saeid Khaghaninejad, Mohammad Saleh |
author_sort | Aliabadi, Ehsan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluated the marginal bone loss around dental implants by two insertion methods. METHODS: Eligible patients were divided into two groups; manual and mechanized groups. Peri-apical x-ray using a customized device to standardize the radiographs designed and used to take three periodical radiographs; after surgery, three months, and six months follow up. An independent t-test was used to compare the two groups regarding the average level of marginal bone loss (p < 0.05). RESULTS: After excluding dropouts, a total of 273 patients (120 males and 153 females, aged between 25 and 67 years old) were included in the study. The average marginal bone loss in the manual insertion method was 0.44 ± 0.84 mm, and 0.59 ± 0.20 mm, and for the mechanized method was 0.51 ± 0.20 mm and 0.67 ± 0.19 mm after three and six months, respectively. There was a significant difference in marginal bone loss after six months between the two groups(p < 0.001). However, no differences were observed after three months (p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Under the condition of this study, both techniques were safe and resulted in an acceptable amount of bone resorption; however, in the manual method, the less marginal bone loss occurred after six months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6995238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69952382020-02-04 Marginal bone resorption of posterior mandible dental implants with different insertion methods Aliabadi, Ehsan Tavanafar, Saeid Khaghaninejad, Mohammad Saleh BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluated the marginal bone loss around dental implants by two insertion methods. METHODS: Eligible patients were divided into two groups; manual and mechanized groups. Peri-apical x-ray using a customized device to standardize the radiographs designed and used to take three periodical radiographs; after surgery, three months, and six months follow up. An independent t-test was used to compare the two groups regarding the average level of marginal bone loss (p < 0.05). RESULTS: After excluding dropouts, a total of 273 patients (120 males and 153 females, aged between 25 and 67 years old) were included in the study. The average marginal bone loss in the manual insertion method was 0.44 ± 0.84 mm, and 0.59 ± 0.20 mm, and for the mechanized method was 0.51 ± 0.20 mm and 0.67 ± 0.19 mm after three and six months, respectively. There was a significant difference in marginal bone loss after six months between the two groups(p < 0.001). However, no differences were observed after three months (p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Under the condition of this study, both techniques were safe and resulted in an acceptable amount of bone resorption; however, in the manual method, the less marginal bone loss occurred after six months. BioMed Central 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6995238/ /pubmed/32005142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1019-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Aliabadi, Ehsan Tavanafar, Saeid Khaghaninejad, Mohammad Saleh Marginal bone resorption of posterior mandible dental implants with different insertion methods |
title | Marginal bone resorption of posterior mandible dental implants with different insertion methods |
title_full | Marginal bone resorption of posterior mandible dental implants with different insertion methods |
title_fullStr | Marginal bone resorption of posterior mandible dental implants with different insertion methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Marginal bone resorption of posterior mandible dental implants with different insertion methods |
title_short | Marginal bone resorption of posterior mandible dental implants with different insertion methods |
title_sort | marginal bone resorption of posterior mandible dental implants with different insertion methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1019-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aliabadiehsan marginalboneresorptionofposteriormandibledentalimplantswithdifferentinsertionmethods AT tavanafarsaeid marginalboneresorptionofposteriormandibledentalimplantswithdifferentinsertionmethods AT khaghaninejadmohammadsaleh marginalboneresorptionofposteriormandibledentalimplantswithdifferentinsertionmethods |