Cargando…
Outcomes after Treatment of Metaplastic Versus Other Breast Cancer Subtypes
Purpose: Metaplastic breast cancer (BC) is an uncommon yet aggressive histologic subtype of BC. We sought to identify factors associated with its diagnosis and compare the management and outcomes of metaplastic BC with those of other BCs and triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma in particular gi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32047541 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.40817 |
_version_ | 1783493369588088832 |
---|---|
author | Moreno, Amy C. Lin, Yan Heather Bedrosian, Isabelle Shen, Yu Babiera, Gildy V. Shaitelman, Simona F. |
author_facet | Moreno, Amy C. Lin, Yan Heather Bedrosian, Isabelle Shen, Yu Babiera, Gildy V. Shaitelman, Simona F. |
author_sort | Moreno, Amy C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Metaplastic breast cancer (BC) is an uncommon yet aggressive histologic subtype of BC. We sought to identify factors associated with its diagnosis and compare the management and outcomes of metaplastic BC with those of other BCs and triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma in particular given how often it has a triple negative phenotype. Patients and Methods: We identified women diagnosed with invasive BC in 2010-2014 in the National Cancer Data Base, and used univariate analysis to compare baseline patient and tumor characteristics by BC subtype. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent predictors of OS. Results: Of 247,355 cases, 2,084 (0.8%) were metaplastic BC, 55,998 (23%) triple negative BC, and 77% other BC. Relative to non-metaplastic BC, women with metaplastic BC were more likely to be older at diagnosis (median age, 62 vs. 59 years), have ≥1 comorbid conditions (22% vs. 18%), and be on Medicare (41% vs. 33%; P<0.001). Metaplastic BCs tended to be basal-like (77%), and relative to triple-negative or other BC, metaplastic BC was associated with higher clinical T status (cT3-4, 18% vs. 11%, 8%), no clinical nodal involvement (cN0, 86%, 77%, 80%), no lymphovascular invasion (72%, 65%, 62%), and high-grade tumors (71%, 77%, 35%) (P<0.001). Most metaplastic BCs were treated with mastectomy (58%), sentinel lymph node dissection (65%), chest wall or breast irradiation (74%), and chemotherapy (75%) as adjuvant therapy (60%). At a median follow-up time of 44.5 months, OS rates were lower for metaplastic BC than for triple-negative or other BC across all clinical stages at 5 years (stage I, 85%, 87%, 91%; II, 73%, 77%, 87%; III, 43%, 53%, 75%) and at 3 years (Stage IV, 15%, 22%, 64%; P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, increasing age, advanced clinical stage, lymphovascular invasion, axillary (vs. sentinel) node dissection, and no radiation or chemotherapy were associated with worse outcomes in metaplastic BC. Extent of surgery affected survival for triple-negative and other BC but not for metaplastic BC. Conclusion: Outcomes for metaplastic BC continue to be worse than those for other BC subtypes despite modern treatments. Optimizing systemic therapy options, which was a significant predictor of survival, should be a priority in managing metaplastic BC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6995376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69953762020-02-11 Outcomes after Treatment of Metaplastic Versus Other Breast Cancer Subtypes Moreno, Amy C. Lin, Yan Heather Bedrosian, Isabelle Shen, Yu Babiera, Gildy V. Shaitelman, Simona F. J Cancer Research Paper Purpose: Metaplastic breast cancer (BC) is an uncommon yet aggressive histologic subtype of BC. We sought to identify factors associated with its diagnosis and compare the management and outcomes of metaplastic BC with those of other BCs and triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma in particular given how often it has a triple negative phenotype. Patients and Methods: We identified women diagnosed with invasive BC in 2010-2014 in the National Cancer Data Base, and used univariate analysis to compare baseline patient and tumor characteristics by BC subtype. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent predictors of OS. Results: Of 247,355 cases, 2,084 (0.8%) were metaplastic BC, 55,998 (23%) triple negative BC, and 77% other BC. Relative to non-metaplastic BC, women with metaplastic BC were more likely to be older at diagnosis (median age, 62 vs. 59 years), have ≥1 comorbid conditions (22% vs. 18%), and be on Medicare (41% vs. 33%; P<0.001). Metaplastic BCs tended to be basal-like (77%), and relative to triple-negative or other BC, metaplastic BC was associated with higher clinical T status (cT3-4, 18% vs. 11%, 8%), no clinical nodal involvement (cN0, 86%, 77%, 80%), no lymphovascular invasion (72%, 65%, 62%), and high-grade tumors (71%, 77%, 35%) (P<0.001). Most metaplastic BCs were treated with mastectomy (58%), sentinel lymph node dissection (65%), chest wall or breast irradiation (74%), and chemotherapy (75%) as adjuvant therapy (60%). At a median follow-up time of 44.5 months, OS rates were lower for metaplastic BC than for triple-negative or other BC across all clinical stages at 5 years (stage I, 85%, 87%, 91%; II, 73%, 77%, 87%; III, 43%, 53%, 75%) and at 3 years (Stage IV, 15%, 22%, 64%; P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, increasing age, advanced clinical stage, lymphovascular invasion, axillary (vs. sentinel) node dissection, and no radiation or chemotherapy were associated with worse outcomes in metaplastic BC. Extent of surgery affected survival for triple-negative and other BC but not for metaplastic BC. Conclusion: Outcomes for metaplastic BC continue to be worse than those for other BC subtypes despite modern treatments. Optimizing systemic therapy options, which was a significant predictor of survival, should be a priority in managing metaplastic BC. Ivyspring International Publisher 2020-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6995376/ /pubmed/32047541 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.40817 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Moreno, Amy C. Lin, Yan Heather Bedrosian, Isabelle Shen, Yu Babiera, Gildy V. Shaitelman, Simona F. Outcomes after Treatment of Metaplastic Versus Other Breast Cancer Subtypes |
title | Outcomes after Treatment of Metaplastic Versus Other Breast Cancer Subtypes |
title_full | Outcomes after Treatment of Metaplastic Versus Other Breast Cancer Subtypes |
title_fullStr | Outcomes after Treatment of Metaplastic Versus Other Breast Cancer Subtypes |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes after Treatment of Metaplastic Versus Other Breast Cancer Subtypes |
title_short | Outcomes after Treatment of Metaplastic Versus Other Breast Cancer Subtypes |
title_sort | outcomes after treatment of metaplastic versus other breast cancer subtypes |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32047541 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.40817 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morenoamyc outcomesaftertreatmentofmetaplasticversusotherbreastcancersubtypes AT linyanheather outcomesaftertreatmentofmetaplasticversusotherbreastcancersubtypes AT bedrosianisabelle outcomesaftertreatmentofmetaplasticversusotherbreastcancersubtypes AT shenyu outcomesaftertreatmentofmetaplasticversusotherbreastcancersubtypes AT babieragildyv outcomesaftertreatmentofmetaplasticversusotherbreastcancersubtypes AT shaitelmansimonaf outcomesaftertreatmentofmetaplasticversusotherbreastcancersubtypes |