Cargando…

Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at minimum respiratory elastance during mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may improve patient care and outcome. The Clinical utilisation of respiratory elastance (CURE) trial is a two-arm, rando...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Kyeong Tae, Morton, Sophie, Howe, Sarah, Chiew, Yeong Shiong, Knopp, Jennifer L., Docherty, Paul, Pretty, Christopher, Desaive, Thomas, Benyo, Balazs, Szlavecz, Akos, Moeller, Knut, Shaw, Geoffrey M., Chase, J. Geoffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32007099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4035-7
_version_ 1783493416772960256
author Kim, Kyeong Tae
Morton, Sophie
Howe, Sarah
Chiew, Yeong Shiong
Knopp, Jennifer L.
Docherty, Paul
Pretty, Christopher
Desaive, Thomas
Benyo, Balazs
Szlavecz, Akos
Moeller, Knut
Shaw, Geoffrey M.
Chase, J. Geoffrey
author_facet Kim, Kyeong Tae
Morton, Sophie
Howe, Sarah
Chiew, Yeong Shiong
Knopp, Jennifer L.
Docherty, Paul
Pretty, Christopher
Desaive, Thomas
Benyo, Balazs
Szlavecz, Akos
Moeller, Knut
Shaw, Geoffrey M.
Chase, J. Geoffrey
author_sort Kim, Kyeong Tae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at minimum respiratory elastance during mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may improve patient care and outcome. The Clinical utilisation of respiratory elastance (CURE) trial is a two-arm, randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the performance of PEEP selected at an objective, model-based minimal respiratory system elastance in patients with ARDS. METHODS AND DESIGN: The CURE RCT compares two groups of patients requiring invasive MV with a partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio ≤ 200; one criterion of the Berlin consensus definition of moderate (≤ 200) or severe (≤ 100) ARDS. All patients are ventilated using pressure controlled (bi-level) ventilation with tidal volume = 6–8 ml/kg. Patients randomised to the control group will have PEEP selected per standard practice (SPV). Patients randomised to the intervention will have PEEP selected based on a minimal elastance using a model-based computerised method. The CURE RCT is a single-centre trial in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Christchurch hospital, New Zealand, with a target sample size of 320 patients over a maximum of 3 years. The primary outcome is the area under the curve (AUC) ratio of arterial blood oxygenation to the fraction of inspired oxygen over time. Secondary outcomes include length of time of MV, ventilator-free days (VFD) up to 28 days, ICU and hospital length of stay, AUC of oxygen saturation (SpO(2))/FiO(2) during MV, number of desaturation events (SpO(2) < 88%), changes in respiratory mechanics and chest x-ray index scores, rescue therapies (prone positioning, nitric oxide use, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) and hospital and 90-day mortality. DISCUSSION: The CURE RCT is the first trial comparing significant clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS in whom PEEP is selected at minimum elastance using an objective model-based method able to quantify and consider both inter-patient and intra-patient variability. CURE aims to demonstrate the hypothesized benefit of patient-specific PEEP and attest to the significance of real-time monitoring and decision-support for MV in the critical care environment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12614001069640. Registered on 22 September 2014. (https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=366838&isReview=true) The CURE RCT clinical protocol and data usage has been granted by the New Zealand South Regional Ethics Committee (Reference number: 14/STH/132).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6995650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69956502020-02-05 Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial Kim, Kyeong Tae Morton, Sophie Howe, Sarah Chiew, Yeong Shiong Knopp, Jennifer L. Docherty, Paul Pretty, Christopher Desaive, Thomas Benyo, Balazs Szlavecz, Akos Moeller, Knut Shaw, Geoffrey M. Chase, J. Geoffrey Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at minimum respiratory elastance during mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may improve patient care and outcome. The Clinical utilisation of respiratory elastance (CURE) trial is a two-arm, randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the performance of PEEP selected at an objective, model-based minimal respiratory system elastance in patients with ARDS. METHODS AND DESIGN: The CURE RCT compares two groups of patients requiring invasive MV with a partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio ≤ 200; one criterion of the Berlin consensus definition of moderate (≤ 200) or severe (≤ 100) ARDS. All patients are ventilated using pressure controlled (bi-level) ventilation with tidal volume = 6–8 ml/kg. Patients randomised to the control group will have PEEP selected per standard practice (SPV). Patients randomised to the intervention will have PEEP selected based on a minimal elastance using a model-based computerised method. The CURE RCT is a single-centre trial in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Christchurch hospital, New Zealand, with a target sample size of 320 patients over a maximum of 3 years. The primary outcome is the area under the curve (AUC) ratio of arterial blood oxygenation to the fraction of inspired oxygen over time. Secondary outcomes include length of time of MV, ventilator-free days (VFD) up to 28 days, ICU and hospital length of stay, AUC of oxygen saturation (SpO(2))/FiO(2) during MV, number of desaturation events (SpO(2) < 88%), changes in respiratory mechanics and chest x-ray index scores, rescue therapies (prone positioning, nitric oxide use, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) and hospital and 90-day mortality. DISCUSSION: The CURE RCT is the first trial comparing significant clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS in whom PEEP is selected at minimum elastance using an objective model-based method able to quantify and consider both inter-patient and intra-patient variability. CURE aims to demonstrate the hypothesized benefit of patient-specific PEEP and attest to the significance of real-time monitoring and decision-support for MV in the critical care environment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12614001069640. Registered on 22 September 2014. (https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=366838&isReview=true) The CURE RCT clinical protocol and data usage has been granted by the New Zealand South Regional Ethics Committee (Reference number: 14/STH/132). BioMed Central 2020-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6995650/ /pubmed/32007099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4035-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kim, Kyeong Tae
Morton, Sophie
Howe, Sarah
Chiew, Yeong Shiong
Knopp, Jennifer L.
Docherty, Paul
Pretty, Christopher
Desaive, Thomas
Benyo, Balazs
Szlavecz, Akos
Moeller, Knut
Shaw, Geoffrey M.
Chase, J. Geoffrey
Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial
title Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort model-based peep titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32007099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4035-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kimkyeongtae modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mortonsophie modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT howesarah modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chiewyeongshiong modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT knoppjenniferl modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dochertypaul modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT prettychristopher modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT desaivethomas modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT benyobalazs modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT szlaveczakos modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT moellerknut modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shawgeoffreym modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chasejgeoffrey modelbasedpeeptitrationversusstandardpracticeinmechanicalventilationarandomisedcontrolledtrial