Cargando…

Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor

Plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) enhances the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for collection and subsequent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This international, multicenter, noninterventiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Curly, Chabannon, Christian, Masszi, Tamas, Russell, Nigel, Nahi, Hareth, Kobbe, Guido, Krejci, Marta, Auner, Holger W., Pohlreich, David, Hayden, Patrick, Basak, Grzegorz W., Lenhoff, Stig, Schaap, Nicolaas, van Biezen, Anja, Knol, Cora, Iacobelli, Simona, Liu, Qianying, Celanovic, Marina, Garderet, Laurent, Kröger, Nicolaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0676-0
_version_ 1783493431265329152
author Morris, Curly
Chabannon, Christian
Masszi, Tamas
Russell, Nigel
Nahi, Hareth
Kobbe, Guido
Krejci, Marta
Auner, Holger W.
Pohlreich, David
Hayden, Patrick
Basak, Grzegorz W.
Lenhoff, Stig
Schaap, Nicolaas
van Biezen, Anja
Knol, Cora
Iacobelli, Simona
Liu, Qianying
Celanovic, Marina
Garderet, Laurent
Kröger, Nicolaus
author_facet Morris, Curly
Chabannon, Christian
Masszi, Tamas
Russell, Nigel
Nahi, Hareth
Kobbe, Guido
Krejci, Marta
Auner, Holger W.
Pohlreich, David
Hayden, Patrick
Basak, Grzegorz W.
Lenhoff, Stig
Schaap, Nicolaas
van Biezen, Anja
Knol, Cora
Iacobelli, Simona
Liu, Qianying
Celanovic, Marina
Garderet, Laurent
Kröger, Nicolaus
author_sort Morris, Curly
collection PubMed
description Plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) enhances the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for collection and subsequent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This international, multicenter, noninterventional registry study (NCT01362972), evaluated long-term outcomes for MM patients who received plerixafor versus other mobilization regimens. The comparisons were: G-CSF + plerixafor (G-CSF + P) versus G-CSF-; G-CSF + P versus G-CSF + chemotherapy (G-CSF + C); and G-CSF + P + C versus G-CSF + C. Propensity score matching was used to balance groups. Primary outcome measures were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) after transplantation. After propensity matching, 77 versus 41 patients in the G-CSF + P versus G-CSF cohorts, 129 versus 129 in the G-CSF + P versus G-CSF + C cohorts, and 117 versus 117 in the G-CSF + P + C versus G-CSF + C cohorts were matched, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in a smaller sample size and imbalances were not completely overcome. For both PFS and OS, the upper limits of the hazard ratio 95% confidence intervals exceeded prespecified boundaries; noninferiority was not demonstrated. CIR rates were higher in the plerixafor cohorts. G-CSF + P remains an option for the mobilization of HSCs in poor mobilizers with MM with no substantial differences in PFS, OS, and CIR in comparison with other regimens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6995780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69957802020-02-05 Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor Morris, Curly Chabannon, Christian Masszi, Tamas Russell, Nigel Nahi, Hareth Kobbe, Guido Krejci, Marta Auner, Holger W. Pohlreich, David Hayden, Patrick Basak, Grzegorz W. Lenhoff, Stig Schaap, Nicolaas van Biezen, Anja Knol, Cora Iacobelli, Simona Liu, Qianying Celanovic, Marina Garderet, Laurent Kröger, Nicolaus Bone Marrow Transplant Article Plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) enhances the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for collection and subsequent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This international, multicenter, noninterventional registry study (NCT01362972), evaluated long-term outcomes for MM patients who received plerixafor versus other mobilization regimens. The comparisons were: G-CSF + plerixafor (G-CSF + P) versus G-CSF-; G-CSF + P versus G-CSF + chemotherapy (G-CSF + C); and G-CSF + P + C versus G-CSF + C. Propensity score matching was used to balance groups. Primary outcome measures were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) after transplantation. After propensity matching, 77 versus 41 patients in the G-CSF + P versus G-CSF cohorts, 129 versus 129 in the G-CSF + P versus G-CSF + C cohorts, and 117 versus 117 in the G-CSF + P + C versus G-CSF + C cohorts were matched, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in a smaller sample size and imbalances were not completely overcome. For both PFS and OS, the upper limits of the hazard ratio 95% confidence intervals exceeded prespecified boundaries; noninferiority was not demonstrated. CIR rates were higher in the plerixafor cohorts. G-CSF + P remains an option for the mobilization of HSCs in poor mobilizers with MM with no substantial differences in PFS, OS, and CIR in comparison with other regimens. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-09-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6995780/ /pubmed/31534192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0676-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Morris, Curly
Chabannon, Christian
Masszi, Tamas
Russell, Nigel
Nahi, Hareth
Kobbe, Guido
Krejci, Marta
Auner, Holger W.
Pohlreich, David
Hayden, Patrick
Basak, Grzegorz W.
Lenhoff, Stig
Schaap, Nicolaas
van Biezen, Anja
Knol, Cora
Iacobelli, Simona
Liu, Qianying
Celanovic, Marina
Garderet, Laurent
Kröger, Nicolaus
Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor
title Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor
title_full Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor
title_fullStr Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor
title_full_unstemmed Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor
title_short Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor
title_sort results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0676-0
work_keys_str_mv AT morriscurly resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT chabannonchristian resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT masszitamas resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT russellnigel resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT nahihareth resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT kobbeguido resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT krejcimarta resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT aunerholgerw resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT pohlreichdavid resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT haydenpatrick resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT basakgrzegorzw resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT lenhoffstig resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT schaapnicolaas resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT vanbiezenanja resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT knolcora resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT iacobellisimona resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT liuqianying resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT celanovicmarina resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT garderetlaurent resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor
AT krogernicolaus resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor