Cargando…
Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor
Plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) enhances the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for collection and subsequent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This international, multicenter, noninterventiona...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0676-0 |
_version_ | 1783493431265329152 |
---|---|
author | Morris, Curly Chabannon, Christian Masszi, Tamas Russell, Nigel Nahi, Hareth Kobbe, Guido Krejci, Marta Auner, Holger W. Pohlreich, David Hayden, Patrick Basak, Grzegorz W. Lenhoff, Stig Schaap, Nicolaas van Biezen, Anja Knol, Cora Iacobelli, Simona Liu, Qianying Celanovic, Marina Garderet, Laurent Kröger, Nicolaus |
author_facet | Morris, Curly Chabannon, Christian Masszi, Tamas Russell, Nigel Nahi, Hareth Kobbe, Guido Krejci, Marta Auner, Holger W. Pohlreich, David Hayden, Patrick Basak, Grzegorz W. Lenhoff, Stig Schaap, Nicolaas van Biezen, Anja Knol, Cora Iacobelli, Simona Liu, Qianying Celanovic, Marina Garderet, Laurent Kröger, Nicolaus |
author_sort | Morris, Curly |
collection | PubMed |
description | Plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) enhances the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for collection and subsequent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This international, multicenter, noninterventional registry study (NCT01362972), evaluated long-term outcomes for MM patients who received plerixafor versus other mobilization regimens. The comparisons were: G-CSF + plerixafor (G-CSF + P) versus G-CSF-; G-CSF + P versus G-CSF + chemotherapy (G-CSF + C); and G-CSF + P + C versus G-CSF + C. Propensity score matching was used to balance groups. Primary outcome measures were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) after transplantation. After propensity matching, 77 versus 41 patients in the G-CSF + P versus G-CSF cohorts, 129 versus 129 in the G-CSF + P versus G-CSF + C cohorts, and 117 versus 117 in the G-CSF + P + C versus G-CSF + C cohorts were matched, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in a smaller sample size and imbalances were not completely overcome. For both PFS and OS, the upper limits of the hazard ratio 95% confidence intervals exceeded prespecified boundaries; noninferiority was not demonstrated. CIR rates were higher in the plerixafor cohorts. G-CSF + P remains an option for the mobilization of HSCs in poor mobilizers with MM with no substantial differences in PFS, OS, and CIR in comparison with other regimens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6995780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69957802020-02-05 Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor Morris, Curly Chabannon, Christian Masszi, Tamas Russell, Nigel Nahi, Hareth Kobbe, Guido Krejci, Marta Auner, Holger W. Pohlreich, David Hayden, Patrick Basak, Grzegorz W. Lenhoff, Stig Schaap, Nicolaas van Biezen, Anja Knol, Cora Iacobelli, Simona Liu, Qianying Celanovic, Marina Garderet, Laurent Kröger, Nicolaus Bone Marrow Transplant Article Plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) enhances the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for collection and subsequent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This international, multicenter, noninterventional registry study (NCT01362972), evaluated long-term outcomes for MM patients who received plerixafor versus other mobilization regimens. The comparisons were: G-CSF + plerixafor (G-CSF + P) versus G-CSF-; G-CSF + P versus G-CSF + chemotherapy (G-CSF + C); and G-CSF + P + C versus G-CSF + C. Propensity score matching was used to balance groups. Primary outcome measures were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) after transplantation. After propensity matching, 77 versus 41 patients in the G-CSF + P versus G-CSF cohorts, 129 versus 129 in the G-CSF + P versus G-CSF + C cohorts, and 117 versus 117 in the G-CSF + P + C versus G-CSF + C cohorts were matched, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in a smaller sample size and imbalances were not completely overcome. For both PFS and OS, the upper limits of the hazard ratio 95% confidence intervals exceeded prespecified boundaries; noninferiority was not demonstrated. CIR rates were higher in the plerixafor cohorts. G-CSF + P remains an option for the mobilization of HSCs in poor mobilizers with MM with no substantial differences in PFS, OS, and CIR in comparison with other regimens. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-09-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6995780/ /pubmed/31534192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0676-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Morris, Curly Chabannon, Christian Masszi, Tamas Russell, Nigel Nahi, Hareth Kobbe, Guido Krejci, Marta Auner, Holger W. Pohlreich, David Hayden, Patrick Basak, Grzegorz W. Lenhoff, Stig Schaap, Nicolaas van Biezen, Anja Knol, Cora Iacobelli, Simona Liu, Qianying Celanovic, Marina Garderet, Laurent Kröger, Nicolaus Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor |
title | Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor |
title_full | Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor |
title_fullStr | Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor |
title_full_unstemmed | Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor |
title_short | Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor |
title_sort | results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0676-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morriscurly resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT chabannonchristian resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT masszitamas resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT russellnigel resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT nahihareth resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT kobbeguido resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT krejcimarta resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT aunerholgerw resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT pohlreichdavid resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT haydenpatrick resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT basakgrzegorzw resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT lenhoffstig resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT schaapnicolaas resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT vanbiezenanja resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT knolcora resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT iacobellisimona resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT liuqianying resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT celanovicmarina resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT garderetlaurent resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor AT krogernicolaus resultsfromamulticenternoninterventionalregistrystudyformultiplemyelomapatientswhoreceivedstemcellmobilizationregimenswithandwithoutplerixafor |