Cargando…

Digital histology with Mueller microscopy: how to mitigate an impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations

Mueller microscopy studies of fixed unstained histological cuts of human skin models were combined with an analysis of experimental data within the framework of differential Mueller matrix (MM) formalism. A custom-built Mueller polarimetric microscope was used in transmission configuration for the o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hee Ryung, Li, Pengcheng, Yoo, Thomas Sang Hyuk, Lotz, Christian, Groeber-Becker, Florian Kai, Dembski, Sofia, Garcia-Caurel, Enric, Ossikovski, Razvigor, Ma, Hui, Novikova, Tatiana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31347339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.7.076004
_version_ 1783493450152280064
author Lee, Hee Ryung
Li, Pengcheng
Yoo, Thomas Sang Hyuk
Lotz, Christian
Groeber-Becker, Florian Kai
Dembski, Sofia
Garcia-Caurel, Enric
Ossikovski, Razvigor
Ma, Hui
Novikova, Tatiana
author_facet Lee, Hee Ryung
Li, Pengcheng
Yoo, Thomas Sang Hyuk
Lotz, Christian
Groeber-Becker, Florian Kai
Dembski, Sofia
Garcia-Caurel, Enric
Ossikovski, Razvigor
Ma, Hui
Novikova, Tatiana
author_sort Lee, Hee Ryung
collection PubMed
description Mueller microscopy studies of fixed unstained histological cuts of human skin models were combined with an analysis of experimental data within the framework of differential Mueller matrix (MM) formalism. A custom-built Mueller polarimetric microscope was used in transmission configuration for the optical measurements of skin tissue model adjacent cuts of various nominal thicknesses (5 to [Formula: see text]). The maps of both depolarization and polarization parameters were calculated from the corresponding microscopic MM images by applying a logarithmic Mueller matrix decomposition (LMMD) pixelwise. The parameters derived from LMMD of measured tissue cuts and the intensity of transmitted light were used for an automated segmentation of microscopy images to delineate dermal and epidermal layers. The quadratic dependence of depolarization parameters and linear dependence of polarization parameters on thickness, as predicted by the theory, was confirmed in our measurements. These findings pave the way toward digital histology with polarized light by presenting the combination of optimal optical markers, which allows mitigating the impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations and increases the contrast of polarimetric images for tissue diagnostics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6995960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69959602020-02-10 Digital histology with Mueller microscopy: how to mitigate an impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations Lee, Hee Ryung Li, Pengcheng Yoo, Thomas Sang Hyuk Lotz, Christian Groeber-Becker, Florian Kai Dembski, Sofia Garcia-Caurel, Enric Ossikovski, Razvigor Ma, Hui Novikova, Tatiana J Biomed Opt Imaging Mueller microscopy studies of fixed unstained histological cuts of human skin models were combined with an analysis of experimental data within the framework of differential Mueller matrix (MM) formalism. A custom-built Mueller polarimetric microscope was used in transmission configuration for the optical measurements of skin tissue model adjacent cuts of various nominal thicknesses (5 to [Formula: see text]). The maps of both depolarization and polarization parameters were calculated from the corresponding microscopic MM images by applying a logarithmic Mueller matrix decomposition (LMMD) pixelwise. The parameters derived from LMMD of measured tissue cuts and the intensity of transmitted light were used for an automated segmentation of microscopy images to delineate dermal and epidermal layers. The quadratic dependence of depolarization parameters and linear dependence of polarization parameters on thickness, as predicted by the theory, was confirmed in our measurements. These findings pave the way toward digital histology with polarized light by presenting the combination of optimal optical markers, which allows mitigating the impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations and increases the contrast of polarimetric images for tissue diagnostics. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2019-07-25 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6995960/ /pubmed/31347339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.7.076004 Text en © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Imaging
Lee, Hee Ryung
Li, Pengcheng
Yoo, Thomas Sang Hyuk
Lotz, Christian
Groeber-Becker, Florian Kai
Dembski, Sofia
Garcia-Caurel, Enric
Ossikovski, Razvigor
Ma, Hui
Novikova, Tatiana
Digital histology with Mueller microscopy: how to mitigate an impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations
title Digital histology with Mueller microscopy: how to mitigate an impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations
title_full Digital histology with Mueller microscopy: how to mitigate an impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations
title_fullStr Digital histology with Mueller microscopy: how to mitigate an impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations
title_full_unstemmed Digital histology with Mueller microscopy: how to mitigate an impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations
title_short Digital histology with Mueller microscopy: how to mitigate an impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations
title_sort digital histology with mueller microscopy: how to mitigate an impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations
topic Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31347339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.7.076004
work_keys_str_mv AT leeheeryung digitalhistologywithmuellermicroscopyhowtomitigateanimpactoftissuecutthicknessfluctuations
AT lipengcheng digitalhistologywithmuellermicroscopyhowtomitigateanimpactoftissuecutthicknessfluctuations
AT yoothomassanghyuk digitalhistologywithmuellermicroscopyhowtomitigateanimpactoftissuecutthicknessfluctuations
AT lotzchristian digitalhistologywithmuellermicroscopyhowtomitigateanimpactoftissuecutthicknessfluctuations
AT groeberbeckerfloriankai digitalhistologywithmuellermicroscopyhowtomitigateanimpactoftissuecutthicknessfluctuations
AT dembskisofia digitalhistologywithmuellermicroscopyhowtomitigateanimpactoftissuecutthicknessfluctuations
AT garciacaurelenric digitalhistologywithmuellermicroscopyhowtomitigateanimpactoftissuecutthicknessfluctuations
AT ossikovskirazvigor digitalhistologywithmuellermicroscopyhowtomitigateanimpactoftissuecutthicknessfluctuations
AT mahui digitalhistologywithmuellermicroscopyhowtomitigateanimpactoftissuecutthicknessfluctuations
AT novikovatatiana digitalhistologywithmuellermicroscopyhowtomitigateanimpactoftissuecutthicknessfluctuations