Cargando…
Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats
BACKGROUND: Feline osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of long-standing pain and physical dysfunction. Performing a physical examination of a cat is often challenging. There is a need for disease-specific questionnaires or the so-called clinical metrology instruments (CMIs) to facilitate diagnosis...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105115 |
_version_ | 1783493463548887040 |
---|---|
author | Stadig, Sarah Lascelles, B Duncan X Nyman, Gorel Bergh, Anna |
author_facet | Stadig, Sarah Lascelles, B Duncan X Nyman, Gorel Bergh, Anna |
author_sort | Stadig, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Feline osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of long-standing pain and physical dysfunction. Performing a physical examination of a cat is often challenging. There is a need for disease-specific questionnaires or the so-called clinical metrology instruments (CMIs) to facilitate diagnosis and evaluation of treatment of feline OA. The CMI provides the owners an assessment of the cat’s behavioural and lifestyle changes in the home environment. The purpose of the study was to evaluate readability, internal consistency, reliability and discriminatory ability of four CMIs. METHODS: This is a prospective, cross-sectional study with 142 client-owned cats. Feline OA was diagnosed based on medical history, orthopaedic examination and radiography. RESULTS: The results indicate that all four instruments have sound readability, internal consistency, are reliable over time and have good discriminatory ability. Preliminary cut-off values with optimal sensitivity and specificity were suggested for each instrument. The osteoarthritic cats showed significant changes in behavioural response to pain during orthopaedic examination, compared with sound cats. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that all four questionnaires make an important contribution in a clinical setting, and that the cat’s behavioural response to pain during physical examination should be a parameter to take into account as a possible indication of chronic pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6996100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69961002020-02-18 Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats Stadig, Sarah Lascelles, B Duncan X Nyman, Gorel Bergh, Anna Vet Rec Paper BACKGROUND: Feline osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of long-standing pain and physical dysfunction. Performing a physical examination of a cat is often challenging. There is a need for disease-specific questionnaires or the so-called clinical metrology instruments (CMIs) to facilitate diagnosis and evaluation of treatment of feline OA. The CMI provides the owners an assessment of the cat’s behavioural and lifestyle changes in the home environment. The purpose of the study was to evaluate readability, internal consistency, reliability and discriminatory ability of four CMIs. METHODS: This is a prospective, cross-sectional study with 142 client-owned cats. Feline OA was diagnosed based on medical history, orthopaedic examination and radiography. RESULTS: The results indicate that all four instruments have sound readability, internal consistency, are reliable over time and have good discriminatory ability. Preliminary cut-off values with optimal sensitivity and specificity were suggested for each instrument. The osteoarthritic cats showed significant changes in behavioural response to pain during orthopaedic examination, compared with sound cats. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that all four questionnaires make an important contribution in a clinical setting, and that the cat’s behavioural response to pain during physical examination should be a parameter to take into account as a possible indication of chronic pain. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-21 2019-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6996100/ /pubmed/31619513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105115 Text en © British Veterinary Association 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, an indication of whether changes were made, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Paper Stadig, Sarah Lascelles, B Duncan X Nyman, Gorel Bergh, Anna Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats |
title | Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats |
title_full | Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats |
title_fullStr | Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats |
title_short | Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats |
title_sort | evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats |
topic | Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stadigsarah evaluationandcomparisonofpainquestionnairesforclinicalscreeningofosteoarthritisincats AT lascellesbduncanx evaluationandcomparisonofpainquestionnairesforclinicalscreeningofosteoarthritisincats AT nymangorel evaluationandcomparisonofpainquestionnairesforclinicalscreeningofosteoarthritisincats AT berghanna evaluationandcomparisonofpainquestionnairesforclinicalscreeningofosteoarthritisincats |