Cargando…

Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats

BACKGROUND: Feline osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of long-standing pain and physical dysfunction. Performing a physical examination of a cat is often challenging. There is a need for disease-specific questionnaires or the so-called clinical metrology instruments (CMIs) to facilitate diagnosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stadig, Sarah, Lascelles, B Duncan X, Nyman, Gorel, Bergh, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105115
_version_ 1783493463548887040
author Stadig, Sarah
Lascelles, B Duncan X
Nyman, Gorel
Bergh, Anna
author_facet Stadig, Sarah
Lascelles, B Duncan X
Nyman, Gorel
Bergh, Anna
author_sort Stadig, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Feline osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of long-standing pain and physical dysfunction. Performing a physical examination of a cat is often challenging. There is a need for disease-specific questionnaires or the so-called clinical metrology instruments (CMIs) to facilitate diagnosis and evaluation of treatment of feline OA. The CMI provides the owners an assessment of the cat’s behavioural and lifestyle changes in the home environment. The purpose of the study was to evaluate readability, internal consistency, reliability and discriminatory ability of four CMIs. METHODS: This is a prospective, cross-sectional study with 142 client-owned cats. Feline OA was diagnosed based on medical history, orthopaedic examination and radiography. RESULTS: The results indicate that all four instruments have sound readability, internal consistency, are reliable over time and have good discriminatory ability. Preliminary cut-off values with optimal sensitivity and specificity were suggested for each instrument. The osteoarthritic cats showed significant changes in behavioural response to pain during orthopaedic examination, compared with sound cats. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that all four questionnaires make an important contribution in a clinical setting, and that the cat’s behavioural response to pain during physical examination should be a parameter to take into account as a possible indication of chronic pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6996100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69961002020-02-18 Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats Stadig, Sarah Lascelles, B Duncan X Nyman, Gorel Bergh, Anna Vet Rec Paper BACKGROUND: Feline osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of long-standing pain and physical dysfunction. Performing a physical examination of a cat is often challenging. There is a need for disease-specific questionnaires or the so-called clinical metrology instruments (CMIs) to facilitate diagnosis and evaluation of treatment of feline OA. The CMI provides the owners an assessment of the cat’s behavioural and lifestyle changes in the home environment. The purpose of the study was to evaluate readability, internal consistency, reliability and discriminatory ability of four CMIs. METHODS: This is a prospective, cross-sectional study with 142 client-owned cats. Feline OA was diagnosed based on medical history, orthopaedic examination and radiography. RESULTS: The results indicate that all four instruments have sound readability, internal consistency, are reliable over time and have good discriminatory ability. Preliminary cut-off values with optimal sensitivity and specificity were suggested for each instrument. The osteoarthritic cats showed significant changes in behavioural response to pain during orthopaedic examination, compared with sound cats. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that all four questionnaires make an important contribution in a clinical setting, and that the cat’s behavioural response to pain during physical examination should be a parameter to take into account as a possible indication of chronic pain. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-21 2019-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6996100/ /pubmed/31619513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105115 Text en © British Veterinary Association 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, an indication of whether changes were made, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Paper
Stadig, Sarah
Lascelles, B Duncan X
Nyman, Gorel
Bergh, Anna
Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats
title Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats
title_full Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats
title_fullStr Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats
title_short Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats
title_sort evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats
topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105115
work_keys_str_mv AT stadigsarah evaluationandcomparisonofpainquestionnairesforclinicalscreeningofosteoarthritisincats
AT lascellesbduncanx evaluationandcomparisonofpainquestionnairesforclinicalscreeningofosteoarthritisincats
AT nymangorel evaluationandcomparisonofpainquestionnairesforclinicalscreeningofosteoarthritisincats
AT berghanna evaluationandcomparisonofpainquestionnairesforclinicalscreeningofosteoarthritisincats