Cargando…

Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance

BACKGROUND: Multicomponent interventions combined with health coaching are widely recommended to improve a healthy lifestyle. The aim of the present study was to analyse the usage and acceptance of a multicomponent intervention (telephone, web and face-to-face coaching) for low back pain patients, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dejonghe, Lea Anna Lisa, Rudolf, Kevin, Becker, Jennifer, Stassen, Gerrit, Froboese, Ingo, Schaller, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-019-0154-4
_version_ 1783493479250264064
author Dejonghe, Lea Anna Lisa
Rudolf, Kevin
Becker, Jennifer
Stassen, Gerrit
Froboese, Ingo
Schaller, Andrea
author_facet Dejonghe, Lea Anna Lisa
Rudolf, Kevin
Becker, Jennifer
Stassen, Gerrit
Froboese, Ingo
Schaller, Andrea
author_sort Dejonghe, Lea Anna Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multicomponent interventions combined with health coaching are widely recommended to improve a healthy lifestyle. The aim of the present study was to analyse the usage and acceptance of a multicomponent intervention (telephone, web and face-to-face coaching) for low back pain patients, and thereby gain an understanding of why this intervention was not as effective as expected. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial, aimed at promoting physical activity, was conducted. It was a cross-sectional study based on data of a multicomponent intervention group (baseline = 201 participants). For evaluating the usage and acceptance, descriptive statistics were applied. RESULTS: Over half (n = 118) of the patients participated at least once in the telephone coaching. Approximately half of the participants (44 of 90) rated the telephone coaching as “good”. 34 of 92 (37%) participants reported of visiting the web-platform. The web-platform was comprehensible for nearly one-quarter (n = 8 of 33) and very useful for one participant. The face-to-face-contact was rated highly (range: 79.4–88.2 out of 100). CONCLUSION: Usage of the telephone coaching approach was moderate with even fewer participants visiting the web-platform. In addition, these approaches were not rated as very useful. The acceptance of the face-to-face contact was high. Since the usage and acceptance could influence the effectiveness, utilisation and acceptance studies might help to explain the reason for non-effective lifestyle interventions. Therefore, more studies analysing the usage and acceptance are needed. To improve the usage and acceptance, a stronger participatory orientation in the design of interventions and the integration of face-to-face contact could be helpful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6996177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69961772020-02-05 Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance Dejonghe, Lea Anna Lisa Rudolf, Kevin Becker, Jennifer Stassen, Gerrit Froboese, Ingo Schaller, Andrea BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: Multicomponent interventions combined with health coaching are widely recommended to improve a healthy lifestyle. The aim of the present study was to analyse the usage and acceptance of a multicomponent intervention (telephone, web and face-to-face coaching) for low back pain patients, and thereby gain an understanding of why this intervention was not as effective as expected. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial, aimed at promoting physical activity, was conducted. It was a cross-sectional study based on data of a multicomponent intervention group (baseline = 201 participants). For evaluating the usage and acceptance, descriptive statistics were applied. RESULTS: Over half (n = 118) of the patients participated at least once in the telephone coaching. Approximately half of the participants (44 of 90) rated the telephone coaching as “good”. 34 of 92 (37%) participants reported of visiting the web-platform. The web-platform was comprehensible for nearly one-quarter (n = 8 of 33) and very useful for one participant. The face-to-face-contact was rated highly (range: 79.4–88.2 out of 100). CONCLUSION: Usage of the telephone coaching approach was moderate with even fewer participants visiting the web-platform. In addition, these approaches were not rated as very useful. The acceptance of the face-to-face contact was high. Since the usage and acceptance could influence the effectiveness, utilisation and acceptance studies might help to explain the reason for non-effective lifestyle interventions. Therefore, more studies analysing the usage and acceptance are needed. To improve the usage and acceptance, a stronger participatory orientation in the design of interventions and the integration of face-to-face contact could be helpful. BioMed Central 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6996177/ /pubmed/32025308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-019-0154-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dejonghe, Lea Anna Lisa
Rudolf, Kevin
Becker, Jennifer
Stassen, Gerrit
Froboese, Ingo
Schaller, Andrea
Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
title Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
title_full Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
title_fullStr Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
title_full_unstemmed Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
title_short Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
title_sort health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-019-0154-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dejongheleaannalisa healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance
AT rudolfkevin healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance
AT beckerjennifer healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance
AT stassengerrit healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance
AT froboeseingo healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance
AT schallerandrea healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance