Cargando…
Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance
BACKGROUND: Multicomponent interventions combined with health coaching are widely recommended to improve a healthy lifestyle. The aim of the present study was to analyse the usage and acceptance of a multicomponent intervention (telephone, web and face-to-face coaching) for low back pain patients, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-019-0154-4 |
_version_ | 1783493479250264064 |
---|---|
author | Dejonghe, Lea Anna Lisa Rudolf, Kevin Becker, Jennifer Stassen, Gerrit Froboese, Ingo Schaller, Andrea |
author_facet | Dejonghe, Lea Anna Lisa Rudolf, Kevin Becker, Jennifer Stassen, Gerrit Froboese, Ingo Schaller, Andrea |
author_sort | Dejonghe, Lea Anna Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multicomponent interventions combined with health coaching are widely recommended to improve a healthy lifestyle. The aim of the present study was to analyse the usage and acceptance of a multicomponent intervention (telephone, web and face-to-face coaching) for low back pain patients, and thereby gain an understanding of why this intervention was not as effective as expected. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial, aimed at promoting physical activity, was conducted. It was a cross-sectional study based on data of a multicomponent intervention group (baseline = 201 participants). For evaluating the usage and acceptance, descriptive statistics were applied. RESULTS: Over half (n = 118) of the patients participated at least once in the telephone coaching. Approximately half of the participants (44 of 90) rated the telephone coaching as “good”. 34 of 92 (37%) participants reported of visiting the web-platform. The web-platform was comprehensible for nearly one-quarter (n = 8 of 33) and very useful for one participant. The face-to-face-contact was rated highly (range: 79.4–88.2 out of 100). CONCLUSION: Usage of the telephone coaching approach was moderate with even fewer participants visiting the web-platform. In addition, these approaches were not rated as very useful. The acceptance of the face-to-face contact was high. Since the usage and acceptance could influence the effectiveness, utilisation and acceptance studies might help to explain the reason for non-effective lifestyle interventions. Therefore, more studies analysing the usage and acceptance are needed. To improve the usage and acceptance, a stronger participatory orientation in the design of interventions and the integration of face-to-face contact could be helpful. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6996177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69961772020-02-05 Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance Dejonghe, Lea Anna Lisa Rudolf, Kevin Becker, Jennifer Stassen, Gerrit Froboese, Ingo Schaller, Andrea BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: Multicomponent interventions combined with health coaching are widely recommended to improve a healthy lifestyle. The aim of the present study was to analyse the usage and acceptance of a multicomponent intervention (telephone, web and face-to-face coaching) for low back pain patients, and thereby gain an understanding of why this intervention was not as effective as expected. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial, aimed at promoting physical activity, was conducted. It was a cross-sectional study based on data of a multicomponent intervention group (baseline = 201 participants). For evaluating the usage and acceptance, descriptive statistics were applied. RESULTS: Over half (n = 118) of the patients participated at least once in the telephone coaching. Approximately half of the participants (44 of 90) rated the telephone coaching as “good”. 34 of 92 (37%) participants reported of visiting the web-platform. The web-platform was comprehensible for nearly one-quarter (n = 8 of 33) and very useful for one participant. The face-to-face-contact was rated highly (range: 79.4–88.2 out of 100). CONCLUSION: Usage of the telephone coaching approach was moderate with even fewer participants visiting the web-platform. In addition, these approaches were not rated as very useful. The acceptance of the face-to-face contact was high. Since the usage and acceptance could influence the effectiveness, utilisation and acceptance studies might help to explain the reason for non-effective lifestyle interventions. Therefore, more studies analysing the usage and acceptance are needed. To improve the usage and acceptance, a stronger participatory orientation in the design of interventions and the integration of face-to-face contact could be helpful. BioMed Central 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6996177/ /pubmed/32025308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-019-0154-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dejonghe, Lea Anna Lisa Rudolf, Kevin Becker, Jennifer Stassen, Gerrit Froboese, Ingo Schaller, Andrea Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance |
title | Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance |
title_full | Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance |
title_fullStr | Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance |
title_full_unstemmed | Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance |
title_short | Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance |
title_sort | health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-019-0154-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dejongheleaannalisa healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance AT rudolfkevin healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance AT beckerjennifer healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance AT stassengerrit healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance AT froboeseingo healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance AT schallerandrea healthcoachingforpromotingphysicalactivityinlowbackpainpatientsasecondaryanalysisontheusageandacceptance |