Cargando…

Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix

BACKGROUND: Single‐stage reconstruction is used widely after mastectomy. Prepectoral implant placement is a relatively new technique. This multicentre audit examined surgical outcomes following prepectoral reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix (ADM). METHODS: All patients who had a mastectomy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandarana, M., Harries, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32011819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50236
_version_ 1783493542086180864
author Chandarana, M.
Harries, S.
author_facet Chandarana, M.
Harries, S.
author_sort Chandarana, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single‐stage reconstruction is used widely after mastectomy. Prepectoral implant placement is a relatively new technique. This multicentre audit examined surgical outcomes following prepectoral reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix (ADM). METHODS: All patients who had a mastectomy with prepectoral breast reconstruction and ADM in the participating centres between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. Demographic and treatment details, and short‐ and long‐term operative outcomes were recorded. Factors affecting complications and implant loss were analysed: age, BMI, smoking status, diabetes, vascular disease, laterality of surgery, previous ipsilateral breast surgery or radiotherapy, indication for surgery (invasive versus in situ carcinoma, or risk reduction), type of mastectomy, axillary clearance, breast volume, implant volume, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 406 reconstructions were performed across 18 centres. Median follow‐up was 9·65 months. Median hospital stay was 1 day. The 90‐day unplanned readmission rate was 15·7 per cent, and the return‐to‐theatre rate 16·7 per cent. Some 15·3 per cent of patients had a major complication, with a 90‐day implant loss rate of 4·9 per cent. A further six patients had delayed implant loss. In multivariable analysis, no factor was significantly associated with complications or implant loss. CONCLUSION: Prepectoral breast reconstruction with ADM has satisfactory surgical outcomes. The duration of follow‐up needs to be extended to examine outcomes in patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6996627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69966272020-02-05 Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix Chandarana, M. Harries, S. BJS Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: Single‐stage reconstruction is used widely after mastectomy. Prepectoral implant placement is a relatively new technique. This multicentre audit examined surgical outcomes following prepectoral reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix (ADM). METHODS: All patients who had a mastectomy with prepectoral breast reconstruction and ADM in the participating centres between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. Demographic and treatment details, and short‐ and long‐term operative outcomes were recorded. Factors affecting complications and implant loss were analysed: age, BMI, smoking status, diabetes, vascular disease, laterality of surgery, previous ipsilateral breast surgery or radiotherapy, indication for surgery (invasive versus in situ carcinoma, or risk reduction), type of mastectomy, axillary clearance, breast volume, implant volume, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 406 reconstructions were performed across 18 centres. Median follow‐up was 9·65 months. Median hospital stay was 1 day. The 90‐day unplanned readmission rate was 15·7 per cent, and the return‐to‐theatre rate 16·7 per cent. Some 15·3 per cent of patients had a major complication, with a 90‐day implant loss rate of 4·9 per cent. A further six patients had delayed implant loss. In multivariable analysis, no factor was significantly associated with complications or implant loss. CONCLUSION: Prepectoral breast reconstruction with ADM has satisfactory surgical outcomes. The duration of follow‐up needs to be extended to examine outcomes in patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6996627/ /pubmed/32011819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50236 Text en © 2019 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chandarana, M.
Harries, S.
Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
title Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
title_full Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
title_fullStr Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
title_full_unstemmed Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
title_short Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
title_sort multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32011819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50236
work_keys_str_mv AT chandaranam multicentrestudyofprepectoralbreastreconstructionusingacellulardermalmatrix
AT harriess multicentrestudyofprepectoralbreastreconstructionusingacellulardermalmatrix
AT multicentrestudyofprepectoralbreastreconstructionusingacellulardermalmatrix