Cargando…
Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines
BACKGROUND: ERAS® Society guidelines are holistic, multidisciplinary tools designed to improve outcomes after surgery. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach was initially developed for colorectal surgery and has been implemented successfully across a large number of settings, resulting...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32011810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50238 |
_version_ | 1783493542313721856 |
---|---|
author | Brindle, M. Nelson, G. Lobo, D. N. Ljungqvist, O. Gustafsson, U. O. |
author_facet | Brindle, M. Nelson, G. Lobo, D. N. Ljungqvist, O. Gustafsson, U. O. |
author_sort | Brindle, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: ERAS® Society guidelines are holistic, multidisciplinary tools designed to improve outcomes after surgery. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach was initially developed for colorectal surgery and has been implemented successfully across a large number of settings, resulting in improved patient outcomes. As the ERAS approach is increasingly being adopted worldwide and new guidelines are being generated for new populations, there is a need to define an ERAS® Society guideline and the methodology that should be followed in its development. METHODS: The ERAS® Society recommended approach for developing new guidelines is based on the creation of multidisciplinary guideline development groups responsible for defining topics, planning the literature search, and assessing the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Clear definitions for the elements of an ERAS guideline involve multimodal and multidisciplinary approaches impacting on multiple patient outcomes. Recommended methodology for guideline development follows a rigorous approach with systematic identification and evaluation of evidence, and consensus‐based development of recommendations. Guidelines should then be evaluated and reviewed regularly to ensure that the best and most up‐to‐date evidence is used consistently to support surgical patients. CONCLUSION: There is a need for a standardized, evidence‐informed approach to both the development of new ERAS® Society guidelines, and the adaptation and revision of existing guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6996628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69966282020-02-05 Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines Brindle, M. Nelson, G. Lobo, D. N. Ljungqvist, O. Gustafsson, U. O. BJS Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: ERAS® Society guidelines are holistic, multidisciplinary tools designed to improve outcomes after surgery. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach was initially developed for colorectal surgery and has been implemented successfully across a large number of settings, resulting in improved patient outcomes. As the ERAS approach is increasingly being adopted worldwide and new guidelines are being generated for new populations, there is a need to define an ERAS® Society guideline and the methodology that should be followed in its development. METHODS: The ERAS® Society recommended approach for developing new guidelines is based on the creation of multidisciplinary guideline development groups responsible for defining topics, planning the literature search, and assessing the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Clear definitions for the elements of an ERAS guideline involve multimodal and multidisciplinary approaches impacting on multiple patient outcomes. Recommended methodology for guideline development follows a rigorous approach with systematic identification and evaluation of evidence, and consensus‐based development of recommendations. Guidelines should then be evaluated and reviewed regularly to ensure that the best and most up‐to‐date evidence is used consistently to support surgical patients. CONCLUSION: There is a need for a standardized, evidence‐informed approach to both the development of new ERAS® Society guidelines, and the adaptation and revision of existing guidelines. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6996628/ /pubmed/32011810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50238 Text en © 2019 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Brindle, M. Nelson, G. Lobo, D. N. Ljungqvist, O. Gustafsson, U. O. Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines |
title | Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines |
title_full | Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines |
title_fullStr | Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines |
title_short | Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines |
title_sort | recommendations from the eras® society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32011810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brindlem recommendationsfromtheerassocietyforstandardsforthedevelopmentofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryguidelines AT nelsong recommendationsfromtheerassocietyforstandardsforthedevelopmentofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryguidelines AT lobodn recommendationsfromtheerassocietyforstandardsforthedevelopmentofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryguidelines AT ljungqvisto recommendationsfromtheerassocietyforstandardsforthedevelopmentofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryguidelines AT gustafssonuo recommendationsfromtheerassocietyforstandardsforthedevelopmentofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryguidelines |