Cargando…
Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study
BACKGROUND: The quality of care for tuberculosis (TB) is deficient in high-burden countries and urgently needs improvement. However, comprehensively identifying the required improvements is challenging. Providing high-quality TB care is an important step toward improving patients’ quality of life an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31909722 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13903 |
_version_ | 1783493565990567936 |
---|---|
author | Truzyan, Nune Grigoryan, Zaruhi Musheghyan, Lusine Crape, Byron Petrosyan, Varduhi |
author_facet | Truzyan, Nune Grigoryan, Zaruhi Musheghyan, Lusine Crape, Byron Petrosyan, Varduhi |
author_sort | Truzyan, Nune |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The quality of care for tuberculosis (TB) is deficient in high-burden countries and urgently needs improvement. However, comprehensively identifying the required improvements is challenging. Providing high-quality TB care is an important step toward improving patients’ quality of life and decreasing TB morbidity and mortality. Effective tools for assessing the quality of TB services using international standards and guidelines can identify existing gaps in services and inform improvements to ensure high-quality inpatient TB services. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop evaluation instruments for defining the quality of provision of TB services. METHODS: To assess quality of services in the largest TB hospital in Armenia, we developed instruments based on the Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards for Hospitals, International Standards for TB Care, TB Laboratories Bio-Safety Standards, and the World Health Organization framework for conducting TB program reviews. A mixed methods approach was utilized, triangulating quantitative (checklists) and qualitative (in-depth interviews) results. A scoring system and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and treats analysis was applied to detail results for each of the 122 standards assessed. A scaling approach was used to present overall performances of inpatient services for eight patient-centered functions and five organization management functions. RESULTS: Overall, 40 in-depth interviews and 91 checklists (21 observations, 16 policy papers, 20 staff qualification documents, and 34 medical records) were developed, utilized, and analyzed to explore practices of health care professionals, assess inpatient treatment experience of patients and their family members, evaluate facility environmental conditions, and define the degree of compliance to standards. CONCLUSIONS: The effective comprehensive evaluation instruments and methods developed in this study for quality of inpatient TB services support the implementation of similar effective assessments in other countries. It may also become a platform to develop similar approaches for assessing ambulatory TB services in resource-limited countries. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/13903 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6996743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69967432020-02-20 Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study Truzyan, Nune Grigoryan, Zaruhi Musheghyan, Lusine Crape, Byron Petrosyan, Varduhi JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: The quality of care for tuberculosis (TB) is deficient in high-burden countries and urgently needs improvement. However, comprehensively identifying the required improvements is challenging. Providing high-quality TB care is an important step toward improving patients’ quality of life and decreasing TB morbidity and mortality. Effective tools for assessing the quality of TB services using international standards and guidelines can identify existing gaps in services and inform improvements to ensure high-quality inpatient TB services. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop evaluation instruments for defining the quality of provision of TB services. METHODS: To assess quality of services in the largest TB hospital in Armenia, we developed instruments based on the Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards for Hospitals, International Standards for TB Care, TB Laboratories Bio-Safety Standards, and the World Health Organization framework for conducting TB program reviews. A mixed methods approach was utilized, triangulating quantitative (checklists) and qualitative (in-depth interviews) results. A scoring system and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and treats analysis was applied to detail results for each of the 122 standards assessed. A scaling approach was used to present overall performances of inpatient services for eight patient-centered functions and five organization management functions. RESULTS: Overall, 40 in-depth interviews and 91 checklists (21 observations, 16 policy papers, 20 staff qualification documents, and 34 medical records) were developed, utilized, and analyzed to explore practices of health care professionals, assess inpatient treatment experience of patients and their family members, evaluate facility environmental conditions, and define the degree of compliance to standards. CONCLUSIONS: The effective comprehensive evaluation instruments and methods developed in this study for quality of inpatient TB services support the implementation of similar effective assessments in other countries. It may also become a platform to develop similar approaches for assessing ambulatory TB services in resource-limited countries. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/13903 JMIR Publications 2020-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6996743/ /pubmed/31909722 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13903 Text en ©Nune Truzyan, Zaruhi Grigoryan, Lusine Musheghyan, Byron Crape, Varduhi Petrosyan. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 07.01.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Truzyan, Nune Grigoryan, Zaruhi Musheghyan, Lusine Crape, Byron Petrosyan, Varduhi Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study |
title | Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study |
title_full | Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study |
title_fullStr | Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study |
title_short | Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study |
title_sort | quality of inpatient tuberculosis health care in high-burden resource-limited settings: protocol for a comprehensive mixed methods assessment study |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31909722 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13903 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT truzyannune qualityofinpatienttuberculosishealthcareinhighburdenresourcelimitedsettingsprotocolforacomprehensivemixedmethodsassessmentstudy AT grigoryanzaruhi qualityofinpatienttuberculosishealthcareinhighburdenresourcelimitedsettingsprotocolforacomprehensivemixedmethodsassessmentstudy AT musheghyanlusine qualityofinpatienttuberculosishealthcareinhighburdenresourcelimitedsettingsprotocolforacomprehensivemixedmethodsassessmentstudy AT crapebyron qualityofinpatienttuberculosishealthcareinhighburdenresourcelimitedsettingsprotocolforacomprehensivemixedmethodsassessmentstudy AT petrosyanvarduhi qualityofinpatienttuberculosishealthcareinhighburdenresourcelimitedsettingsprotocolforacomprehensivemixedmethodsassessmentstudy |