Cargando…

Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study

BACKGROUND: The quality of care for tuberculosis (TB) is deficient in high-burden countries and urgently needs improvement. However, comprehensively identifying the required improvements is challenging. Providing high-quality TB care is an important step toward improving patients’ quality of life an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Truzyan, Nune, Grigoryan, Zaruhi, Musheghyan, Lusine, Crape, Byron, Petrosyan, Varduhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31909722
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13903
_version_ 1783493565990567936
author Truzyan, Nune
Grigoryan, Zaruhi
Musheghyan, Lusine
Crape, Byron
Petrosyan, Varduhi
author_facet Truzyan, Nune
Grigoryan, Zaruhi
Musheghyan, Lusine
Crape, Byron
Petrosyan, Varduhi
author_sort Truzyan, Nune
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The quality of care for tuberculosis (TB) is deficient in high-burden countries and urgently needs improvement. However, comprehensively identifying the required improvements is challenging. Providing high-quality TB care is an important step toward improving patients’ quality of life and decreasing TB morbidity and mortality. Effective tools for assessing the quality of TB services using international standards and guidelines can identify existing gaps in services and inform improvements to ensure high-quality inpatient TB services. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop evaluation instruments for defining the quality of provision of TB services. METHODS: To assess quality of services in the largest TB hospital in Armenia, we developed instruments based on the Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards for Hospitals, International Standards for TB Care, TB Laboratories Bio-Safety Standards, and the World Health Organization framework for conducting TB program reviews. A mixed methods approach was utilized, triangulating quantitative (checklists) and qualitative (in-depth interviews) results. A scoring system and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and treats analysis was applied to detail results for each of the 122 standards assessed. A scaling approach was used to present overall performances of inpatient services for eight patient-centered functions and five organization management functions. RESULTS: Overall, 40 in-depth interviews and 91 checklists (21 observations, 16 policy papers, 20 staff qualification documents, and 34 medical records) were developed, utilized, and analyzed to explore practices of health care professionals, assess inpatient treatment experience of patients and their family members, evaluate facility environmental conditions, and define the degree of compliance to standards. CONCLUSIONS: The effective comprehensive evaluation instruments and methods developed in this study for quality of inpatient TB services support the implementation of similar effective assessments in other countries. It may also become a platform to develop similar approaches for assessing ambulatory TB services in resource-limited countries. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/13903
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6996743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69967432020-02-20 Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study Truzyan, Nune Grigoryan, Zaruhi Musheghyan, Lusine Crape, Byron Petrosyan, Varduhi JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: The quality of care for tuberculosis (TB) is deficient in high-burden countries and urgently needs improvement. However, comprehensively identifying the required improvements is challenging. Providing high-quality TB care is an important step toward improving patients’ quality of life and decreasing TB morbidity and mortality. Effective tools for assessing the quality of TB services using international standards and guidelines can identify existing gaps in services and inform improvements to ensure high-quality inpatient TB services. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop evaluation instruments for defining the quality of provision of TB services. METHODS: To assess quality of services in the largest TB hospital in Armenia, we developed instruments based on the Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards for Hospitals, International Standards for TB Care, TB Laboratories Bio-Safety Standards, and the World Health Organization framework for conducting TB program reviews. A mixed methods approach was utilized, triangulating quantitative (checklists) and qualitative (in-depth interviews) results. A scoring system and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and treats analysis was applied to detail results for each of the 122 standards assessed. A scaling approach was used to present overall performances of inpatient services for eight patient-centered functions and five organization management functions. RESULTS: Overall, 40 in-depth interviews and 91 checklists (21 observations, 16 policy papers, 20 staff qualification documents, and 34 medical records) were developed, utilized, and analyzed to explore practices of health care professionals, assess inpatient treatment experience of patients and their family members, evaluate facility environmental conditions, and define the degree of compliance to standards. CONCLUSIONS: The effective comprehensive evaluation instruments and methods developed in this study for quality of inpatient TB services support the implementation of similar effective assessments in other countries. It may also become a platform to develop similar approaches for assessing ambulatory TB services in resource-limited countries. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/13903 JMIR Publications 2020-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6996743/ /pubmed/31909722 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13903 Text en ©Nune Truzyan, Zaruhi Grigoryan, Lusine Musheghyan, Byron Crape, Varduhi Petrosyan. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 07.01.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Truzyan, Nune
Grigoryan, Zaruhi
Musheghyan, Lusine
Crape, Byron
Petrosyan, Varduhi
Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study
title Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study
title_full Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study
title_fullStr Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study
title_short Quality of Inpatient Tuberculosis Health Care in High-Burden Resource-Limited Settings: Protocol for a Comprehensive Mixed Methods Assessment Study
title_sort quality of inpatient tuberculosis health care in high-burden resource-limited settings: protocol for a comprehensive mixed methods assessment study
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31909722
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13903
work_keys_str_mv AT truzyannune qualityofinpatienttuberculosishealthcareinhighburdenresourcelimitedsettingsprotocolforacomprehensivemixedmethodsassessmentstudy
AT grigoryanzaruhi qualityofinpatienttuberculosishealthcareinhighburdenresourcelimitedsettingsprotocolforacomprehensivemixedmethodsassessmentstudy
AT musheghyanlusine qualityofinpatienttuberculosishealthcareinhighburdenresourcelimitedsettingsprotocolforacomprehensivemixedmethodsassessmentstudy
AT crapebyron qualityofinpatienttuberculosishealthcareinhighburdenresourcelimitedsettingsprotocolforacomprehensivemixedmethodsassessmentstudy
AT petrosyanvarduhi qualityofinpatienttuberculosishealthcareinhighburdenresourcelimitedsettingsprotocolforacomprehensivemixedmethodsassessmentstudy