Cargando…
Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data
Open data is information made freely available to third parties in structured formats without restrictive licensing conditions, permitting commercial and noncommercial organizations to innovate. In the context of National Health Service (NHS) data, this is intended to improve patient outcomes and ef...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31929101 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15603 |
_version_ | 1783493566750785536 |
---|---|
author | Bacon, Seb Goldacre, Ben |
author_facet | Bacon, Seb Goldacre, Ben |
author_sort | Bacon, Seb |
collection | PubMed |
description | Open data is information made freely available to third parties in structured formats without restrictive licensing conditions, permitting commercial and noncommercial organizations to innovate. In the context of National Health Service (NHS) data, this is intended to improve patient outcomes and efficiency. EBM DataLab is a research group with a focus on online tools which turn our research findings into actionable monthly outputs. We regularly import and process more than 15 different NHS open datasets to deliver OpenPrescribing.net, one of the most high-impact use cases for NHS England’s open data, with over 15,000 unique users each month. In this paper, we have described the many breaches of best practices around NHS open data that we have encountered. Examples include datasets that repeatedly change location without warning or forwarding; datasets that are needlessly behind a “CAPTCHA” and so cannot be automatically downloaded; longitudinal datasets that change their structure without warning or documentation; near-duplicate datasets with unexplained differences; datasets that are impossible to locate, and thus may or may not exist; poor or absent documentation; and withholding of data for dubious reasons. We propose new open ways of working that will support better analytics for all users of the NHS. These include better curation, better documentation, and systems for better dialogue with technical teams. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6996746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69967462020-02-20 Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data Bacon, Seb Goldacre, Ben J Med Internet Res Viewpoint Open data is information made freely available to third parties in structured formats without restrictive licensing conditions, permitting commercial and noncommercial organizations to innovate. In the context of National Health Service (NHS) data, this is intended to improve patient outcomes and efficiency. EBM DataLab is a research group with a focus on online tools which turn our research findings into actionable monthly outputs. We regularly import and process more than 15 different NHS open datasets to deliver OpenPrescribing.net, one of the most high-impact use cases for NHS England’s open data, with over 15,000 unique users each month. In this paper, we have described the many breaches of best practices around NHS open data that we have encountered. Examples include datasets that repeatedly change location without warning or forwarding; datasets that are needlessly behind a “CAPTCHA” and so cannot be automatically downloaded; longitudinal datasets that change their structure without warning or documentation; near-duplicate datasets with unexplained differences; datasets that are impossible to locate, and thus may or may not exist; poor or absent documentation; and withholding of data for dubious reasons. We propose new open ways of working that will support better analytics for all users of the NHS. These include better curation, better documentation, and systems for better dialogue with technical teams. JMIR Publications 2020-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6996746/ /pubmed/31929101 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15603 Text en ©Seb John Bacon, Ben Goldacre. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 13.01.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Bacon, Seb Goldacre, Ben Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data |
title | Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data |
title_full | Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data |
title_fullStr | Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data |
title_short | Barriers to Working With National Health Service England’s Open Data |
title_sort | barriers to working with national health service england’s open data |
topic | Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31929101 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15603 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baconseb barrierstoworkingwithnationalhealthserviceenglandsopendata AT goldacreben barrierstoworkingwithnationalhealthserviceenglandsopendata |