Cargando…

Pre-analytical error for three point of care venous blood testing platforms in acute ambulatory settings: A mixed methods service evaluation

INTRODUCTION: Point of care blood testing to aid diagnosis is becoming increasingly common in acute ambulatory settings and enables timely investigation of a range of diagnostic markers. However, this testing allows scope for errors in the pre-analytical phase, which depends on the operator handling...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fanshawe, Thomas R., Glogowska, Margaret, Edwards, George, Turner, Philip J., Smith, Ian, Steele, Rosie, Croxson, Caroline, Bowen, Jordan S. T., Hayward, Gail N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228687
_version_ 1783493586059264000
author Fanshawe, Thomas R.
Glogowska, Margaret
Edwards, George
Turner, Philip J.
Smith, Ian
Steele, Rosie
Croxson, Caroline
Bowen, Jordan S. T.
Hayward, Gail N.
author_facet Fanshawe, Thomas R.
Glogowska, Margaret
Edwards, George
Turner, Philip J.
Smith, Ian
Steele, Rosie
Croxson, Caroline
Bowen, Jordan S. T.
Hayward, Gail N.
author_sort Fanshawe, Thomas R.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Point of care blood testing to aid diagnosis is becoming increasingly common in acute ambulatory settings and enables timely investigation of a range of diagnostic markers. However, this testing allows scope for errors in the pre-analytical phase, which depends on the operator handling and transferring specimens correctly. The extent and nature of these pre-analytical errors in clinical settings has not been widely reported. METHODS: We carried out a convergent parallel mixed-methods service evaluation to investigate pre-analytical errors leading to a machine error reports in a large acute hospital trust in the UK. The quantitative component comprised a retrospective analysis of all recorded error codes from Abbott Point of Care i-STAT 1, i-STAT Alinity and Abbott Rapid Diagnostics Afinion devices to summarise the error frequencies and reasons for error, focusing on those attributable to the operator. The qualitative component included a prospective ethnographic study and a secondary analysis of an existing ethnographic dataset, based in hospital-based ambulatory care and community ambulatory care respectively. RESULTS: The i-STAT had the highest usage (113,266 tests, January 2016-December 2018). As a percentage of all tests attempted, its device-recorded overall error rate was 6.8% (95% confidence interval 6.6% to 6.9%), and in the period when reliable data could be obtained, the operator-attributable error rate was 2.3% (2.2% to 2.4%). Staff identified that the most difficult step was the filling of cartridges, but that this could be improved through practice, with a perception that cartridge wastage through errors was rare. CONCLUSIONS: In the observed settings, the rate of errors attributable to operators of the primary point of care device was less than 1 in 40. In some cases, errors may lead to a small increase in resource use or time required so adequate staff training is necessary to prevent adverse impact on patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6996845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69968452020-02-20 Pre-analytical error for three point of care venous blood testing platforms in acute ambulatory settings: A mixed methods service evaluation Fanshawe, Thomas R. Glogowska, Margaret Edwards, George Turner, Philip J. Smith, Ian Steele, Rosie Croxson, Caroline Bowen, Jordan S. T. Hayward, Gail N. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Point of care blood testing to aid diagnosis is becoming increasingly common in acute ambulatory settings and enables timely investigation of a range of diagnostic markers. However, this testing allows scope for errors in the pre-analytical phase, which depends on the operator handling and transferring specimens correctly. The extent and nature of these pre-analytical errors in clinical settings has not been widely reported. METHODS: We carried out a convergent parallel mixed-methods service evaluation to investigate pre-analytical errors leading to a machine error reports in a large acute hospital trust in the UK. The quantitative component comprised a retrospective analysis of all recorded error codes from Abbott Point of Care i-STAT 1, i-STAT Alinity and Abbott Rapid Diagnostics Afinion devices to summarise the error frequencies and reasons for error, focusing on those attributable to the operator. The qualitative component included a prospective ethnographic study and a secondary analysis of an existing ethnographic dataset, based in hospital-based ambulatory care and community ambulatory care respectively. RESULTS: The i-STAT had the highest usage (113,266 tests, January 2016-December 2018). As a percentage of all tests attempted, its device-recorded overall error rate was 6.8% (95% confidence interval 6.6% to 6.9%), and in the period when reliable data could be obtained, the operator-attributable error rate was 2.3% (2.2% to 2.4%). Staff identified that the most difficult step was the filling of cartridges, but that this could be improved through practice, with a perception that cartridge wastage through errors was rare. CONCLUSIONS: In the observed settings, the rate of errors attributable to operators of the primary point of care device was less than 1 in 40. In some cases, errors may lead to a small increase in resource use or time required so adequate staff training is necessary to prevent adverse impact on patient care. Public Library of Science 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6996845/ /pubmed/32012203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228687 Text en © 2020 Fanshawe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fanshawe, Thomas R.
Glogowska, Margaret
Edwards, George
Turner, Philip J.
Smith, Ian
Steele, Rosie
Croxson, Caroline
Bowen, Jordan S. T.
Hayward, Gail N.
Pre-analytical error for three point of care venous blood testing platforms in acute ambulatory settings: A mixed methods service evaluation
title Pre-analytical error for three point of care venous blood testing platforms in acute ambulatory settings: A mixed methods service evaluation
title_full Pre-analytical error for three point of care venous blood testing platforms in acute ambulatory settings: A mixed methods service evaluation
title_fullStr Pre-analytical error for three point of care venous blood testing platforms in acute ambulatory settings: A mixed methods service evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Pre-analytical error for three point of care venous blood testing platforms in acute ambulatory settings: A mixed methods service evaluation
title_short Pre-analytical error for three point of care venous blood testing platforms in acute ambulatory settings: A mixed methods service evaluation
title_sort pre-analytical error for three point of care venous blood testing platforms in acute ambulatory settings: a mixed methods service evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228687
work_keys_str_mv AT fanshawethomasr preanalyticalerrorforthreepointofcarevenousbloodtestingplatformsinacuteambulatorysettingsamixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT glogowskamargaret preanalyticalerrorforthreepointofcarevenousbloodtestingplatformsinacuteambulatorysettingsamixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT edwardsgeorge preanalyticalerrorforthreepointofcarevenousbloodtestingplatformsinacuteambulatorysettingsamixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT turnerphilipj preanalyticalerrorforthreepointofcarevenousbloodtestingplatformsinacuteambulatorysettingsamixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT smithian preanalyticalerrorforthreepointofcarevenousbloodtestingplatformsinacuteambulatorysettingsamixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT steelerosie preanalyticalerrorforthreepointofcarevenousbloodtestingplatformsinacuteambulatorysettingsamixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT croxsoncaroline preanalyticalerrorforthreepointofcarevenousbloodtestingplatformsinacuteambulatorysettingsamixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT bowenjordanst preanalyticalerrorforthreepointofcarevenousbloodtestingplatformsinacuteambulatorysettingsamixedmethodsserviceevaluation
AT haywardgailn preanalyticalerrorforthreepointofcarevenousbloodtestingplatformsinacuteambulatorysettingsamixedmethodsserviceevaluation