Cargando…

Influence of tumor characteristics on correction differences between cone‐beam computed tomography‐guided patient setup strategies in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the correction differences between vertebra and tumor matching as cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT)‐guided setup strategies in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and the correlations with tumor characteristics such as size, mobility, and location. METHODS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jang, Seong Soon, Park, Suk Young, Cho, Eun Youn, Yang, Po Song, Huh, Gil Ja, Yang, Young Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31802637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13261
_version_ 1783493605332090880
author Jang, Seong Soon
Park, Suk Young
Cho, Eun Youn
Yang, Po Song
Huh, Gil Ja
Yang, Young Jun
author_facet Jang, Seong Soon
Park, Suk Young
Cho, Eun Youn
Yang, Po Song
Huh, Gil Ja
Yang, Young Jun
author_sort Jang, Seong Soon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the correction differences between vertebra and tumor matching as cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT)‐guided setup strategies in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and the correlations with tumor characteristics such as size, mobility, and location. METHODS: The manual registrations for 33 lung tumors treated with SBRT were retrospectively performed by matching thoracic vertebrae for vertebra matching and then by matching CBCT‐visualized tumors within the internal target volume obtained from a four‐dimensional CT dataset for tumor matching. RESULTS: The mean correction difference between the two matching methods during the SBRT fractions was larger in the anterior‐posterior direction (2.7 mm) than in the superior‐inferior (2.1 mm) and left‐right (1.4 mm) directions, with differences of less than 5 mm in 90% of the total 134 CBCT fractions. The X‐axis and direct distances from the central axis to the tumor had significant correlations with the correction differences in all three directions, while the mobility‐related parameters were correlated only in the superior‐inferior direction. The absolute differences in lung‐dose parameters after applying the margins (3.4–6.5 mm) required for the setup errors from vertebra matching relative to tumor matching were mild, with values of 1.95 Gy for the mean lung dose and 3.9% for V20. CONCLUSION: The setup differences between vertebra and tumor matching in the CBCT‐guided setup without rotation correction were increased in tumors located long distances from the central axis. The additional safety margins of 3.4–6.5 mm were required for the setup errors from vertebra matching. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study The correction difference between the vertebra and tumor matching as CBCT‐guided setup strategies was the largest in the anterior‐posterior direction and significantly correlated with the X‐axis and direct distances from the central axis to the tumor. What this study adds Setup differences between vertebra and tumor matching in the CBCT‐guided setup were increased in tumors located long distances from the central axis. The additional safety margins of 3.4–6.5 mm were required for the setup errors from vertebra matching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6996988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69969882020-02-05 Influence of tumor characteristics on correction differences between cone‐beam computed tomography‐guided patient setup strategies in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer Jang, Seong Soon Park, Suk Young Cho, Eun Youn Yang, Po Song Huh, Gil Ja Yang, Young Jun Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: To evaluate the correction differences between vertebra and tumor matching as cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT)‐guided setup strategies in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and the correlations with tumor characteristics such as size, mobility, and location. METHODS: The manual registrations for 33 lung tumors treated with SBRT were retrospectively performed by matching thoracic vertebrae for vertebra matching and then by matching CBCT‐visualized tumors within the internal target volume obtained from a four‐dimensional CT dataset for tumor matching. RESULTS: The mean correction difference between the two matching methods during the SBRT fractions was larger in the anterior‐posterior direction (2.7 mm) than in the superior‐inferior (2.1 mm) and left‐right (1.4 mm) directions, with differences of less than 5 mm in 90% of the total 134 CBCT fractions. The X‐axis and direct distances from the central axis to the tumor had significant correlations with the correction differences in all three directions, while the mobility‐related parameters were correlated only in the superior‐inferior direction. The absolute differences in lung‐dose parameters after applying the margins (3.4–6.5 mm) required for the setup errors from vertebra matching relative to tumor matching were mild, with values of 1.95 Gy for the mean lung dose and 3.9% for V20. CONCLUSION: The setup differences between vertebra and tumor matching in the CBCT‐guided setup without rotation correction were increased in tumors located long distances from the central axis. The additional safety margins of 3.4–6.5 mm were required for the setup errors from vertebra matching. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study The correction difference between the vertebra and tumor matching as CBCT‐guided setup strategies was the largest in the anterior‐posterior direction and significantly correlated with the X‐axis and direct distances from the central axis to the tumor. What this study adds Setup differences between vertebra and tumor matching in the CBCT‐guided setup were increased in tumors located long distances from the central axis. The additional safety margins of 3.4–6.5 mm were required for the setup errors from vertebra matching. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-12-05 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6996988/ /pubmed/31802637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13261 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jang, Seong Soon
Park, Suk Young
Cho, Eun Youn
Yang, Po Song
Huh, Gil Ja
Yang, Young Jun
Influence of tumor characteristics on correction differences between cone‐beam computed tomography‐guided patient setup strategies in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer
title Influence of tumor characteristics on correction differences between cone‐beam computed tomography‐guided patient setup strategies in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer
title_full Influence of tumor characteristics on correction differences between cone‐beam computed tomography‐guided patient setup strategies in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer
title_fullStr Influence of tumor characteristics on correction differences between cone‐beam computed tomography‐guided patient setup strategies in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Influence of tumor characteristics on correction differences between cone‐beam computed tomography‐guided patient setup strategies in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer
title_short Influence of tumor characteristics on correction differences between cone‐beam computed tomography‐guided patient setup strategies in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer
title_sort influence of tumor characteristics on correction differences between cone‐beam computed tomography‐guided patient setup strategies in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31802637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13261
work_keys_str_mv AT jangseongsoon influenceoftumorcharacteristicsoncorrectiondifferencesbetweenconebeamcomputedtomographyguidedpatientsetupstrategiesinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungcancer
AT parksukyoung influenceoftumorcharacteristicsoncorrectiondifferencesbetweenconebeamcomputedtomographyguidedpatientsetupstrategiesinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungcancer
AT choeunyoun influenceoftumorcharacteristicsoncorrectiondifferencesbetweenconebeamcomputedtomographyguidedpatientsetupstrategiesinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungcancer
AT yangposong influenceoftumorcharacteristicsoncorrectiondifferencesbetweenconebeamcomputedtomographyguidedpatientsetupstrategiesinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungcancer
AT huhgilja influenceoftumorcharacteristicsoncorrectiondifferencesbetweenconebeamcomputedtomographyguidedpatientsetupstrategiesinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungcancer
AT yangyoungjun influenceoftumorcharacteristicsoncorrectiondifferencesbetweenconebeamcomputedtomographyguidedpatientsetupstrategiesinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungcancer