Cargando…
Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study
PURPOSE: Dydrogesterone (DYG) is an alternative progestin in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with weaker pituitary suppression than medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in normal ovulatory women. However, the endocrinological characteristics, oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099323 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S230129 |
_version_ | 1783493649718312960 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Jialyu Xie, Qin Lin, Jiaying Lu, Xuefeng Zhu, Jing Gao, Hongyuan Cai, Renfei Kuang, Yanping |
author_facet | Huang, Jialyu Xie, Qin Lin, Jiaying Lu, Xuefeng Zhu, Jing Gao, Hongyuan Cai, Renfei Kuang, Yanping |
author_sort | Huang, Jialyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Dydrogesterone (DYG) is an alternative progestin in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with weaker pituitary suppression than medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in normal ovulatory women. However, the endocrinological characteristics, oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes of DYG application in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 420 PCOS patients who underwent controlled ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and DYG (n=105) or MPA (n=315) from January 2014 to December 2017. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced with propensity score matching using the nearest-neighbor random matching algorithm in a ratio of 1:3. The primary outcome measure was the number of oocytes retrieved. Other main outcome measures included the number of viable embryos, incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and live birth rate per frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle. RESULTS: A similar number of oocytes was retrieved in the two protocols (16.1±6.5 vs 15.1±10.0, P=0.342). Patients in both groups achieved consistent LH suppression with no premature LH surge detected. In the DYG + hMG group, the mean LH levels were significantly higher than the MPA + hMG group on cycle day 9–11 and trigger day (all P<0.001), and the dose of hMG was significantly lower (1710.7±431.6 vs 1891.3±402.2 IU, P<0.001). No significant between-group differences were found in the number of viable embryos (5.3±3.1 vs 5.0±4.1, P=0.139) and live birth rate per FET cycle (43.5% vs 47.7%, P=0.383). None of the participants experienced moderate-to-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in either group. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the application of DYG in PPOS protocol could achieve comparable oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes to MPA, but significantly reduce the consumption of gonadotropins in PCOS women for IVF treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6997218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69972182020-02-25 Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study Huang, Jialyu Xie, Qin Lin, Jiaying Lu, Xuefeng Zhu, Jing Gao, Hongyuan Cai, Renfei Kuang, Yanping Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research PURPOSE: Dydrogesterone (DYG) is an alternative progestin in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with weaker pituitary suppression than medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in normal ovulatory women. However, the endocrinological characteristics, oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes of DYG application in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 420 PCOS patients who underwent controlled ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and DYG (n=105) or MPA (n=315) from January 2014 to December 2017. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced with propensity score matching using the nearest-neighbor random matching algorithm in a ratio of 1:3. The primary outcome measure was the number of oocytes retrieved. Other main outcome measures included the number of viable embryos, incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and live birth rate per frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle. RESULTS: A similar number of oocytes was retrieved in the two protocols (16.1±6.5 vs 15.1±10.0, P=0.342). Patients in both groups achieved consistent LH suppression with no premature LH surge detected. In the DYG + hMG group, the mean LH levels were significantly higher than the MPA + hMG group on cycle day 9–11 and trigger day (all P<0.001), and the dose of hMG was significantly lower (1710.7±431.6 vs 1891.3±402.2 IU, P<0.001). No significant between-group differences were found in the number of viable embryos (5.3±3.1 vs 5.0±4.1, P=0.139) and live birth rate per FET cycle (43.5% vs 47.7%, P=0.383). None of the participants experienced moderate-to-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in either group. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the application of DYG in PPOS protocol could achieve comparable oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes to MPA, but significantly reduce the consumption of gonadotropins in PCOS women for IVF treatment. Dove 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6997218/ /pubmed/32099323 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S230129 Text en © 2019 Huang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Huang, Jialyu Xie, Qin Lin, Jiaying Lu, Xuefeng Zhu, Jing Gao, Hongyuan Cai, Renfei Kuang, Yanping Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title | Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with dydrogesterone versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome for in vitro fertilization: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099323 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S230129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangjialyu progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT xieqin progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT linjiaying progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT luxuefeng progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhujing progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT gaohongyuan progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT cairenfei progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT kuangyanping progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy |