Cargando…

Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE: Dydrogesterone (DYG) is an alternative progestin in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with weaker pituitary suppression than medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in normal ovulatory women. However, the endocrinological characteristics, oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Jialyu, Xie, Qin, Lin, Jiaying, Lu, Xuefeng, Zhu, Jing, Gao, Hongyuan, Cai, Renfei, Kuang, Yanping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099323
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S230129
_version_ 1783493649718312960
author Huang, Jialyu
Xie, Qin
Lin, Jiaying
Lu, Xuefeng
Zhu, Jing
Gao, Hongyuan
Cai, Renfei
Kuang, Yanping
author_facet Huang, Jialyu
Xie, Qin
Lin, Jiaying
Lu, Xuefeng
Zhu, Jing
Gao, Hongyuan
Cai, Renfei
Kuang, Yanping
author_sort Huang, Jialyu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Dydrogesterone (DYG) is an alternative progestin in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with weaker pituitary suppression than medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in normal ovulatory women. However, the endocrinological characteristics, oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes of DYG application in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 420 PCOS patients who underwent controlled ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and DYG (n=105) or MPA (n=315) from January 2014 to December 2017. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced with propensity score matching using the nearest-neighbor random matching algorithm in a ratio of 1:3. The primary outcome measure was the number of oocytes retrieved. Other main outcome measures included the number of viable embryos, incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and live birth rate per frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle. RESULTS: A similar number of oocytes was retrieved in the two protocols (16.1±6.5 vs 15.1±10.0, P=0.342). Patients in both groups achieved consistent LH suppression with no premature LH surge detected. In the DYG + hMG group, the mean LH levels were significantly higher than the MPA + hMG group on cycle day 9–11 and trigger day (all P<0.001), and the dose of hMG was significantly lower (1710.7±431.6 vs 1891.3±402.2 IU, P<0.001). No significant between-group differences were found in the number of viable embryos (5.3±3.1 vs 5.0±4.1, P=0.139) and live birth rate per FET cycle (43.5% vs 47.7%, P=0.383). None of the participants experienced moderate-to-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in either group. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the application of DYG in PPOS protocol could achieve comparable oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes to MPA, but significantly reduce the consumption of gonadotropins in PCOS women for IVF treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6997218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69972182020-02-25 Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study Huang, Jialyu Xie, Qin Lin, Jiaying Lu, Xuefeng Zhu, Jing Gao, Hongyuan Cai, Renfei Kuang, Yanping Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research PURPOSE: Dydrogesterone (DYG) is an alternative progestin in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with weaker pituitary suppression than medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in normal ovulatory women. However, the endocrinological characteristics, oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes of DYG application in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 420 PCOS patients who underwent controlled ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and DYG (n=105) or MPA (n=315) from January 2014 to December 2017. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced with propensity score matching using the nearest-neighbor random matching algorithm in a ratio of 1:3. The primary outcome measure was the number of oocytes retrieved. Other main outcome measures included the number of viable embryos, incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and live birth rate per frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle. RESULTS: A similar number of oocytes was retrieved in the two protocols (16.1±6.5 vs 15.1±10.0, P=0.342). Patients in both groups achieved consistent LH suppression with no premature LH surge detected. In the DYG + hMG group, the mean LH levels were significantly higher than the MPA + hMG group on cycle day 9–11 and trigger day (all P<0.001), and the dose of hMG was significantly lower (1710.7±431.6 vs 1891.3±402.2 IU, P<0.001). No significant between-group differences were found in the number of viable embryos (5.3±3.1 vs 5.0±4.1, P=0.139) and live birth rate per FET cycle (43.5% vs 47.7%, P=0.383). None of the participants experienced moderate-to-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in either group. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the application of DYG in PPOS protocol could achieve comparable oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes to MPA, but significantly reduce the consumption of gonadotropins in PCOS women for IVF treatment. Dove 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6997218/ /pubmed/32099323 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S230129 Text en © 2019 Huang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Huang, Jialyu
Xie, Qin
Lin, Jiaying
Lu, Xuefeng
Zhu, Jing
Gao, Hongyuan
Cai, Renfei
Kuang, Yanping
Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with dydrogesterone versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome for in vitro fertilization: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099323
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S230129
work_keys_str_mv AT huangjialyu progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT xieqin progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT linjiaying progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT luxuefeng progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhujing progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gaohongyuan progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT cairenfei progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kuangyanping progestinprimedovarianstimulationwithdydrogesteroneversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithpolycysticovariansyndromeforinvitrofertilizationaretrospectivecohortstudy