Cargando…

Comparative cytogenetics of the ground frogs Eupsophus emiliopugini Formas, 1989 and E. vertebralis Grandison, 1961 (Alsodidae) with comments on their inter- and intraspecific chromosome differentiation

Abstract. South American frogs of the genus Eupsophus Fitzinger, 1843 comprise 10 species. Two of them, Eupsophus vertebralis Grandison, 1961 and E. emiliopugini Formas, 1989 belong to the Eupsophus vertebralis group, exhibiting 2n = 28. Fundamental number differences between these species have been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quercia, Camila A., Suárez-Villota, Elkin Y., Foresti, Fausto, Nuñez, José J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32042378
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v14i1.46852
_version_ 1783493655088070656
author Quercia, Camila A.
Suárez-Villota, Elkin Y.
Foresti, Fausto
Nuñez, José J.
author_facet Quercia, Camila A.
Suárez-Villota, Elkin Y.
Foresti, Fausto
Nuñez, José J.
author_sort Quercia, Camila A.
collection PubMed
description Abstract. South American frogs of the genus Eupsophus Fitzinger, 1843 comprise 10 species. Two of them, Eupsophus vertebralis Grandison, 1961 and E. emiliopugini Formas, 1989 belong to the Eupsophus vertebralis group, exhibiting 2n = 28. Fundamental number differences between these species have been described using conventional chromosome staining of few specimens from only two localities. Here, classical techniques (Giemsa, C-banding, CMA(3)/DAPI banding, and Ag-NOR staining), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH, with telomeric and 28S ribosomal probes), were applied on individuals of both species collected from 15 localities. We corroborate differences in fundamental numbers (FN) between E. vertebralis and E. emiliopugini through Giemsa staining and C-banding (FN = 54 and 56, respectively). No interstitial fluorescent signals, but clearly stained telomeric regions were detected by FISH using telomeric probe over spreads from both species. FISH with 28S rDNA probes and Ag-NOR staining confirmed the active nucleolus organizer regions signal on pair 5 for both species. Nevertheless, one E. emiliopugini individual from the Puyehue locality exhibited 28S ribosomal signals on pairs 4 and 5. Interestingly, only one chromosome of each pair showed Ag-NOR positive signals, showing a nucleolar dominance pattern. Chromosomal rearrangements, rRNA gene dosage control, mobile NORs elements, and/or species hybridization process could be involved in this interpopulation chromosomal variation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6997241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69972412020-02-10 Comparative cytogenetics of the ground frogs Eupsophus emiliopugini Formas, 1989 and E. vertebralis Grandison, 1961 (Alsodidae) with comments on their inter- and intraspecific chromosome differentiation Quercia, Camila A. Suárez-Villota, Elkin Y. Foresti, Fausto Nuñez, José J. Comp Cytogenet Research Article Abstract. South American frogs of the genus Eupsophus Fitzinger, 1843 comprise 10 species. Two of them, Eupsophus vertebralis Grandison, 1961 and E. emiliopugini Formas, 1989 belong to the Eupsophus vertebralis group, exhibiting 2n = 28. Fundamental number differences between these species have been described using conventional chromosome staining of few specimens from only two localities. Here, classical techniques (Giemsa, C-banding, CMA(3)/DAPI banding, and Ag-NOR staining), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH, with telomeric and 28S ribosomal probes), were applied on individuals of both species collected from 15 localities. We corroborate differences in fundamental numbers (FN) between E. vertebralis and E. emiliopugini through Giemsa staining and C-banding (FN = 54 and 56, respectively). No interstitial fluorescent signals, but clearly stained telomeric regions were detected by FISH using telomeric probe over spreads from both species. FISH with 28S rDNA probes and Ag-NOR staining confirmed the active nucleolus organizer regions signal on pair 5 for both species. Nevertheless, one E. emiliopugini individual from the Puyehue locality exhibited 28S ribosomal signals on pairs 4 and 5. Interestingly, only one chromosome of each pair showed Ag-NOR positive signals, showing a nucleolar dominance pattern. Chromosomal rearrangements, rRNA gene dosage control, mobile NORs elements, and/or species hybridization process could be involved in this interpopulation chromosomal variation. Pensoft Publishers 2020-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6997241/ /pubmed/32042378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v14i1.46852 Text en Camila A. Quercia, Elkin Y. Suárez-Villota, Fausto Foresti, José J. Nuñez http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Quercia, Camila A.
Suárez-Villota, Elkin Y.
Foresti, Fausto
Nuñez, José J.
Comparative cytogenetics of the ground frogs Eupsophus emiliopugini Formas, 1989 and E. vertebralis Grandison, 1961 (Alsodidae) with comments on their inter- and intraspecific chromosome differentiation
title Comparative cytogenetics of the ground frogs Eupsophus emiliopugini Formas, 1989 and E. vertebralis Grandison, 1961 (Alsodidae) with comments on their inter- and intraspecific chromosome differentiation
title_full Comparative cytogenetics of the ground frogs Eupsophus emiliopugini Formas, 1989 and E. vertebralis Grandison, 1961 (Alsodidae) with comments on their inter- and intraspecific chromosome differentiation
title_fullStr Comparative cytogenetics of the ground frogs Eupsophus emiliopugini Formas, 1989 and E. vertebralis Grandison, 1961 (Alsodidae) with comments on their inter- and intraspecific chromosome differentiation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative cytogenetics of the ground frogs Eupsophus emiliopugini Formas, 1989 and E. vertebralis Grandison, 1961 (Alsodidae) with comments on their inter- and intraspecific chromosome differentiation
title_short Comparative cytogenetics of the ground frogs Eupsophus emiliopugini Formas, 1989 and E. vertebralis Grandison, 1961 (Alsodidae) with comments on their inter- and intraspecific chromosome differentiation
title_sort comparative cytogenetics of the ground frogs eupsophus emiliopugini formas, 1989 and e. vertebralis grandison, 1961 (alsodidae) with comments on their inter- and intraspecific chromosome differentiation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32042378
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v14i1.46852
work_keys_str_mv AT querciacamilaa comparativecytogeneticsofthegroundfrogseupsophusemiliopuginiformas1989andevertebralisgrandison1961alsodidaewithcommentsontheirinterandintraspecificchromosomedifferentiation
AT suarezvillotaelkiny comparativecytogeneticsofthegroundfrogseupsophusemiliopuginiformas1989andevertebralisgrandison1961alsodidaewithcommentsontheirinterandintraspecificchromosomedifferentiation
AT forestifausto comparativecytogeneticsofthegroundfrogseupsophusemiliopuginiformas1989andevertebralisgrandison1961alsodidaewithcommentsontheirinterandintraspecificchromosomedifferentiation
AT nunezjosej comparativecytogeneticsofthegroundfrogseupsophusemiliopuginiformas1989andevertebralisgrandison1961alsodidaewithcommentsontheirinterandintraspecificchromosomedifferentiation