Cargando…

Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil

The use of the double-cone (DC) coil in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is promoted with the notion that the DC coil enables stimulation of deeper brain areas in contrast to conventional figure-of-8 (Fo8) coils. However, systematic comparisons of these two coil types with respect to the spat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schecklmann, Martin, Schmaußer, Maximilian, Klinger, Felix, Kreuzer, Peter M., Krenkel, Lars, Langguth, Berthold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32015398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58034-2
_version_ 1783493681544691712
author Schecklmann, Martin
Schmaußer, Maximilian
Klinger, Felix
Kreuzer, Peter M.
Krenkel, Lars
Langguth, Berthold
author_facet Schecklmann, Martin
Schmaußer, Maximilian
Klinger, Felix
Kreuzer, Peter M.
Krenkel, Lars
Langguth, Berthold
author_sort Schecklmann, Martin
collection PubMed
description The use of the double-cone (DC) coil in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is promoted with the notion that the DC coil enables stimulation of deeper brain areas in contrast to conventional figure-of-8 (Fo8) coils. However, systematic comparisons of these two coil types with respect to the spatial distribution of the magnetic field output and also to the induced activity in superficial and deeper brain areas are limited. Resting motor thresholds of the left and right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and tibialis anterior (TA) were determined with the DC and the Fo8 coil in 17 healthy subjects. Coils were orientated over the corresponding motor area in an angle of 45 degrees for the hand area with the handle pointing in posterior direction and in medio-lateral direction for the leg area. Physical measurements were done with an automatic gantry table using a Gaussmeter. Resting motor threshold was higher for the leg area in contrast to the hand area and for the Fo8 in contrast to the DC coil. Muscle by coil interaction was also significant providing higher differences between leg and hand area for the Fo8 (about 27%) in contrast to the DC coil (about 15%). Magnetic field strength was higher for the DC coil in contrast to the Fo8 coil. The DC coil produces a higher magnetic field with higher depth of penetration than the figure of eight coil.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6997368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69973682020-02-10 Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil Schecklmann, Martin Schmaußer, Maximilian Klinger, Felix Kreuzer, Peter M. Krenkel, Lars Langguth, Berthold Sci Rep Article The use of the double-cone (DC) coil in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is promoted with the notion that the DC coil enables stimulation of deeper brain areas in contrast to conventional figure-of-8 (Fo8) coils. However, systematic comparisons of these two coil types with respect to the spatial distribution of the magnetic field output and also to the induced activity in superficial and deeper brain areas are limited. Resting motor thresholds of the left and right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and tibialis anterior (TA) were determined with the DC and the Fo8 coil in 17 healthy subjects. Coils were orientated over the corresponding motor area in an angle of 45 degrees for the hand area with the handle pointing in posterior direction and in medio-lateral direction for the leg area. Physical measurements were done with an automatic gantry table using a Gaussmeter. Resting motor threshold was higher for the leg area in contrast to the hand area and for the Fo8 in contrast to the DC coil. Muscle by coil interaction was also significant providing higher differences between leg and hand area for the Fo8 (about 27%) in contrast to the DC coil (about 15%). Magnetic field strength was higher for the DC coil in contrast to the Fo8 coil. The DC coil produces a higher magnetic field with higher depth of penetration than the figure of eight coil. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6997368/ /pubmed/32015398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58034-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Schecklmann, Martin
Schmaußer, Maximilian
Klinger, Felix
Kreuzer, Peter M.
Krenkel, Lars
Langguth, Berthold
Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil
title Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil
title_full Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil
title_fullStr Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil
title_full_unstemmed Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil
title_short Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil
title_sort resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32015398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58034-2
work_keys_str_mv AT schecklmannmartin restingmotorthresholdandmagneticfieldoutputofthefigureof8andthedoubleconecoil
AT schmaußermaximilian restingmotorthresholdandmagneticfieldoutputofthefigureof8andthedoubleconecoil
AT klingerfelix restingmotorthresholdandmagneticfieldoutputofthefigureof8andthedoubleconecoil
AT kreuzerpeterm restingmotorthresholdandmagneticfieldoutputofthefigureof8andthedoubleconecoil
AT krenkellars restingmotorthresholdandmagneticfieldoutputofthefigureof8andthedoubleconecoil
AT langguthberthold restingmotorthresholdandmagneticfieldoutputofthefigureof8andthedoubleconecoil