Cargando…

The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions

The influence of Poiseuille flow on cell viability has applications in the areas of cancer metastasis, lab-on-a-chip devices and flow cytometry. Indeed, retaining cell viability is important in the emerging field of cell therapy as cells need to be returned to patients’ bodies. Despite this, it is u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Connolly, Sinead, McGourty, Kieran, Newport, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32015362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58161-w
_version_ 1783493689468780544
author Connolly, Sinead
McGourty, Kieran
Newport, David
author_facet Connolly, Sinead
McGourty, Kieran
Newport, David
author_sort Connolly, Sinead
collection PubMed
description The influence of Poiseuille flow on cell viability has applications in the areas of cancer metastasis, lab-on-a-chip devices and flow cytometry. Indeed, retaining cell viability is important in the emerging field of cell therapy as cells need to be returned to patients’ bodies. Despite this, it is unclear how this fundamental fluid regime affects cell viability. This study investigated the influence that varying flow rate, and the corresponding wall shear stress (τ(w)) has on the viability and inertial positions of circulating cells in laminar pipe flow. The viability of two representative cell lines under different shear stresses in two different systems were investigated while particle streak imaging was used to determine their inertial positions. It was found that peristaltic pumps have a negative effect on cell viability in comparison to syringe pumps. Increasing shear stress in a cone and plate above 3 Pa caused an increase in cell death, however, τ(w) as high as 10 Pa in circulation has little to no effect on cell viability. Inertial lift forces that move cells towards the centre of the channel protect them from experiencing detrimental levels of τ(w), indicating that τ(w) in Poiseuille flow is not a good predictor of cell viability during advection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6997401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69974012020-02-10 The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions Connolly, Sinead McGourty, Kieran Newport, David Sci Rep Article The influence of Poiseuille flow on cell viability has applications in the areas of cancer metastasis, lab-on-a-chip devices and flow cytometry. Indeed, retaining cell viability is important in the emerging field of cell therapy as cells need to be returned to patients’ bodies. Despite this, it is unclear how this fundamental fluid regime affects cell viability. This study investigated the influence that varying flow rate, and the corresponding wall shear stress (τ(w)) has on the viability and inertial positions of circulating cells in laminar pipe flow. The viability of two representative cell lines under different shear stresses in two different systems were investigated while particle streak imaging was used to determine their inertial positions. It was found that peristaltic pumps have a negative effect on cell viability in comparison to syringe pumps. Increasing shear stress in a cone and plate above 3 Pa caused an increase in cell death, however, τ(w) as high as 10 Pa in circulation has little to no effect on cell viability. Inertial lift forces that move cells towards the centre of the channel protect them from experiencing detrimental levels of τ(w), indicating that τ(w) in Poiseuille flow is not a good predictor of cell viability during advection. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6997401/ /pubmed/32015362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58161-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Connolly, Sinead
McGourty, Kieran
Newport, David
The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions
title The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions
title_full The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions
title_fullStr The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions
title_full_unstemmed The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions
title_short The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions
title_sort in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32015362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58161-w
work_keys_str_mv AT connollysinead theinvitroinertialpositionsandviabilityofcellsinsuspensionunderdifferentinvivoflowconditions
AT mcgourtykieran theinvitroinertialpositionsandviabilityofcellsinsuspensionunderdifferentinvivoflowconditions
AT newportdavid theinvitroinertialpositionsandviabilityofcellsinsuspensionunderdifferentinvivoflowconditions
AT connollysinead invitroinertialpositionsandviabilityofcellsinsuspensionunderdifferentinvivoflowconditions
AT mcgourtykieran invitroinertialpositionsandviabilityofcellsinsuspensionunderdifferentinvivoflowconditions
AT newportdavid invitroinertialpositionsandviabilityofcellsinsuspensionunderdifferentinvivoflowconditions