Cargando…
The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions
The influence of Poiseuille flow on cell viability has applications in the areas of cancer metastasis, lab-on-a-chip devices and flow cytometry. Indeed, retaining cell viability is important in the emerging field of cell therapy as cells need to be returned to patients’ bodies. Despite this, it is u...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32015362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58161-w |
_version_ | 1783493689468780544 |
---|---|
author | Connolly, Sinead McGourty, Kieran Newport, David |
author_facet | Connolly, Sinead McGourty, Kieran Newport, David |
author_sort | Connolly, Sinead |
collection | PubMed |
description | The influence of Poiseuille flow on cell viability has applications in the areas of cancer metastasis, lab-on-a-chip devices and flow cytometry. Indeed, retaining cell viability is important in the emerging field of cell therapy as cells need to be returned to patients’ bodies. Despite this, it is unclear how this fundamental fluid regime affects cell viability. This study investigated the influence that varying flow rate, and the corresponding wall shear stress (τ(w)) has on the viability and inertial positions of circulating cells in laminar pipe flow. The viability of two representative cell lines under different shear stresses in two different systems were investigated while particle streak imaging was used to determine their inertial positions. It was found that peristaltic pumps have a negative effect on cell viability in comparison to syringe pumps. Increasing shear stress in a cone and plate above 3 Pa caused an increase in cell death, however, τ(w) as high as 10 Pa in circulation has little to no effect on cell viability. Inertial lift forces that move cells towards the centre of the channel protect them from experiencing detrimental levels of τ(w), indicating that τ(w) in Poiseuille flow is not a good predictor of cell viability during advection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6997401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69974012020-02-10 The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions Connolly, Sinead McGourty, Kieran Newport, David Sci Rep Article The influence of Poiseuille flow on cell viability has applications in the areas of cancer metastasis, lab-on-a-chip devices and flow cytometry. Indeed, retaining cell viability is important in the emerging field of cell therapy as cells need to be returned to patients’ bodies. Despite this, it is unclear how this fundamental fluid regime affects cell viability. This study investigated the influence that varying flow rate, and the corresponding wall shear stress (τ(w)) has on the viability and inertial positions of circulating cells in laminar pipe flow. The viability of two representative cell lines under different shear stresses in two different systems were investigated while particle streak imaging was used to determine their inertial positions. It was found that peristaltic pumps have a negative effect on cell viability in comparison to syringe pumps. Increasing shear stress in a cone and plate above 3 Pa caused an increase in cell death, however, τ(w) as high as 10 Pa in circulation has little to no effect on cell viability. Inertial lift forces that move cells towards the centre of the channel protect them from experiencing detrimental levels of τ(w), indicating that τ(w) in Poiseuille flow is not a good predictor of cell viability during advection. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6997401/ /pubmed/32015362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58161-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Connolly, Sinead McGourty, Kieran Newport, David The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions |
title | The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions |
title_full | The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions |
title_fullStr | The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions |
title_short | The in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions |
title_sort | in vitro inertial positions and viability of cells in suspension under different in vivo flow conditions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32015362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58161-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT connollysinead theinvitroinertialpositionsandviabilityofcellsinsuspensionunderdifferentinvivoflowconditions AT mcgourtykieran theinvitroinertialpositionsandviabilityofcellsinsuspensionunderdifferentinvivoflowconditions AT newportdavid theinvitroinertialpositionsandviabilityofcellsinsuspensionunderdifferentinvivoflowconditions AT connollysinead invitroinertialpositionsandviabilityofcellsinsuspensionunderdifferentinvivoflowconditions AT mcgourtykieran invitroinertialpositionsandviabilityofcellsinsuspensionunderdifferentinvivoflowconditions AT newportdavid invitroinertialpositionsandviabilityofcellsinsuspensionunderdifferentinvivoflowconditions |