Cargando…

Is Embryo Cryopreservation Causing Macrosomia—and What Else?

The number of embryos transferred during an IVF cycle is directly related to the high incidence of multiple births, which is the culprit of perinatal morbidity. Therefore, single fresh embryo transfer (ET) strategy, or freeze-all, followed by a single frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle, may d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orvieto, Raoul, Kirshenbaum, Michal, Gleicher, Norbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32047479
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00019
_version_ 1783493703438958592
author Orvieto, Raoul
Kirshenbaum, Michal
Gleicher, Norbert
author_facet Orvieto, Raoul
Kirshenbaum, Michal
Gleicher, Norbert
author_sort Orvieto, Raoul
collection PubMed
description The number of embryos transferred during an IVF cycle is directly related to the high incidence of multiple births, which is the culprit of perinatal morbidity. Therefore, single fresh embryo transfer (ET) strategy, or freeze-all, followed by a single frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle, may dramatically reduce the rate of multiple births, without compromising the cumulative live birth rates (LBRs). A literature review was conducted for all available evidences assessing obstetrics and perinatal outcomes associated with FET compared to fresh ET and natural conception. While studies comparing fresh and FET cycles in normal responders have yielded conflicting results for pregnancy rate, FET was associated with lower risk of prematurity and low birth weight and increased risk of large for gestational age (LGA) and/or macrosomic in singletons, when compared with fresh ET. Macrosomic/LGA births have a higher risk of fetal hypoxia, stillbirth, shoulder dystocia, perineal lacerations, cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal metabolic disturbances at birth. Nonetheless, it seems that other than higher risk of fetal macrosomia, there are additional obstetric complications associated with FET. The relative risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, as well as perinatal mortality were also demonstrated to be increased in FET compared with singletons from fresh ET and natural conception. Therefore, when considering elective freeze-all policy, in addition to LBR and the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, physicians should consider the aforementioned increased FET cycles' pregnancy complications, including LGA/ macrosomia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, as well as perinatal mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6997460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69974602020-02-11 Is Embryo Cryopreservation Causing Macrosomia—and What Else? Orvieto, Raoul Kirshenbaum, Michal Gleicher, Norbert Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology The number of embryos transferred during an IVF cycle is directly related to the high incidence of multiple births, which is the culprit of perinatal morbidity. Therefore, single fresh embryo transfer (ET) strategy, or freeze-all, followed by a single frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle, may dramatically reduce the rate of multiple births, without compromising the cumulative live birth rates (LBRs). A literature review was conducted for all available evidences assessing obstetrics and perinatal outcomes associated with FET compared to fresh ET and natural conception. While studies comparing fresh and FET cycles in normal responders have yielded conflicting results for pregnancy rate, FET was associated with lower risk of prematurity and low birth weight and increased risk of large for gestational age (LGA) and/or macrosomic in singletons, when compared with fresh ET. Macrosomic/LGA births have a higher risk of fetal hypoxia, stillbirth, shoulder dystocia, perineal lacerations, cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal metabolic disturbances at birth. Nonetheless, it seems that other than higher risk of fetal macrosomia, there are additional obstetric complications associated with FET. The relative risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, as well as perinatal mortality were also demonstrated to be increased in FET compared with singletons from fresh ET and natural conception. Therefore, when considering elective freeze-all policy, in addition to LBR and the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, physicians should consider the aforementioned increased FET cycles' pregnancy complications, including LGA/ macrosomia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, as well as perinatal mortality. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6997460/ /pubmed/32047479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00019 Text en Copyright © 2020 Orvieto, Kirshenbaum and Gleicher. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Orvieto, Raoul
Kirshenbaum, Michal
Gleicher, Norbert
Is Embryo Cryopreservation Causing Macrosomia—and What Else?
title Is Embryo Cryopreservation Causing Macrosomia—and What Else?
title_full Is Embryo Cryopreservation Causing Macrosomia—and What Else?
title_fullStr Is Embryo Cryopreservation Causing Macrosomia—and What Else?
title_full_unstemmed Is Embryo Cryopreservation Causing Macrosomia—and What Else?
title_short Is Embryo Cryopreservation Causing Macrosomia—and What Else?
title_sort is embryo cryopreservation causing macrosomia—and what else?
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32047479
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00019
work_keys_str_mv AT orvietoraoul isembryocryopreservationcausingmacrosomiaandwhatelse
AT kirshenbaummichal isembryocryopreservationcausingmacrosomiaandwhatelse
AT gleichernorbert isembryocryopreservationcausingmacrosomiaandwhatelse