Cargando…
Minimally invasive versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive radical cystectomy (MIRC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) for bladder cancer. METHODS: We searched the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases to identify randomized controlled trials (...
Autores principales: | Shi, Hongbin, Li, Jiangsong, Li, Kui, Yang, Xiaobo, Zhu, Zaisheng, Tian, Daxue |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31638461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519864806 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Risk factors, follow-up, and treatment of urethral recurrence following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of 9498 patients
por: Li, Xinyuan, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Open versus minimal invasive radical cystectomy
por: van Diepen, Danielle C., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Efficacy of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis
por: Yang, Jiao, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Percutaneous endoscopic versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis
por: Song, Yi-Fan, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis
por: Xie, Lei, et al.
Publicado: (2016)