Cargando…

Assessing the Usability, Appeal, and Impact of a Web-Based Training for Adults Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media: Pilot Suicide Prevention Study

BACKGROUND: Suicide prevention remains challenging among youth, as many do not disclose suicidal ideation. Nearly one-third of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI and AN, tribal, or native) youth see concerning messages on social media at least weekly. OBJECTIVE: To prepare adults to support AI an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerr, Bradley, Stephens, David, Pham, Daniel, Ghost Dog, Thomas, McCray, Celena, Caughlan, Colbie, Gaston, Amanda, Gritton, Jesse, Jenkins, Marina, Craig Rushing, Stephanie, Moreno, Megan A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31958066
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14949
_version_ 1783493782255173632
author Kerr, Bradley
Stephens, David
Pham, Daniel
Ghost Dog, Thomas
McCray, Celena
Caughlan, Colbie
Gaston, Amanda
Gritton, Jesse
Jenkins, Marina
Craig Rushing, Stephanie
Moreno, Megan A
author_facet Kerr, Bradley
Stephens, David
Pham, Daniel
Ghost Dog, Thomas
McCray, Celena
Caughlan, Colbie
Gaston, Amanda
Gritton, Jesse
Jenkins, Marina
Craig Rushing, Stephanie
Moreno, Megan A
author_sort Kerr, Bradley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Suicide prevention remains challenging among youth, as many do not disclose suicidal ideation. Nearly one-third of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI and AN, tribal, or native) youth see concerning messages on social media at least weekly. OBJECTIVE: To prepare adults to support AI and AN youth who post or view concerning messages, our team designed an hour-long training: Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media. This study tested the usability, appeal, and impact of the training. METHODS: A purposive sample of 70 adults was recruited to participate in the pilot, which included 2 study arms. Arm 1 participants completed a 30-min training video and reviewed accompanying handouts, including the Viewer Care Plan (VCP). The VCP provided a 3-step planning and response tool: (1) Start the Conversation, (2) Listen, Gather Information, and Assess Viewer Experience, and (3) Plan and Act. The intent of the VCP was to support and connect AI and AN youth who either view or post concerning messages on social media to life-saving resources. Those enrolled in arm 2 participated in an additional interactive role-play scenario with a coach that took place after the training, via text message. Participants provided qualitative and quantitative feedback on the training’s relevance, appeal, and utility. Paired t tests were used to assess confidence in addressing concerning posts between pre- and postsurveys. Content analysis of the role-play transcripts was used to assess the quality and completion of the coached role-plays, in relation to the recommended VCP. RESULTS: Altogether, 35 participants finished the training and completed pre- and postsurveys; 22 participants completed the 6-month follow-up survey. Pre-post analyses of differences in means found significant improvement across several efficacy measures, including confidence starting a conversation about social media (P=.003), confidence contacting the person who posted something concerning (P<.001), and confidence recommending support services to youth who view (P=.001) or youth who post concerning messages (P<.001). Similarly, pre- to 6-month analyses found significant positive improvement across multiple measures, including confidence contacting the youth who posted (P<.001), confidence starting a conversation about social media with youth (P=.003), and an increase in the number of experiences recommending resources for youth who viewed concerning social media posts (P=.02). Of the 3 steps of the VCP, the least followed step in coached role-plays was sharing tools and resources, which is a part of the third Plan and Act step. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that the Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media training is a promising tool to prepare adults to intervene and complete the VCP. Additional evaluation with a larger cohort of participants is needed to determine the unique impact of the role-play scenario and changes in mental health referral rates, behaviors, and skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6997927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69979272020-02-20 Assessing the Usability, Appeal, and Impact of a Web-Based Training for Adults Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media: Pilot Suicide Prevention Study Kerr, Bradley Stephens, David Pham, Daniel Ghost Dog, Thomas McCray, Celena Caughlan, Colbie Gaston, Amanda Gritton, Jesse Jenkins, Marina Craig Rushing, Stephanie Moreno, Megan A JMIR Ment Health Original Paper BACKGROUND: Suicide prevention remains challenging among youth, as many do not disclose suicidal ideation. Nearly one-third of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI and AN, tribal, or native) youth see concerning messages on social media at least weekly. OBJECTIVE: To prepare adults to support AI and AN youth who post or view concerning messages, our team designed an hour-long training: Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media. This study tested the usability, appeal, and impact of the training. METHODS: A purposive sample of 70 adults was recruited to participate in the pilot, which included 2 study arms. Arm 1 participants completed a 30-min training video and reviewed accompanying handouts, including the Viewer Care Plan (VCP). The VCP provided a 3-step planning and response tool: (1) Start the Conversation, (2) Listen, Gather Information, and Assess Viewer Experience, and (3) Plan and Act. The intent of the VCP was to support and connect AI and AN youth who either view or post concerning messages on social media to life-saving resources. Those enrolled in arm 2 participated in an additional interactive role-play scenario with a coach that took place after the training, via text message. Participants provided qualitative and quantitative feedback on the training’s relevance, appeal, and utility. Paired t tests were used to assess confidence in addressing concerning posts between pre- and postsurveys. Content analysis of the role-play transcripts was used to assess the quality and completion of the coached role-plays, in relation to the recommended VCP. RESULTS: Altogether, 35 participants finished the training and completed pre- and postsurveys; 22 participants completed the 6-month follow-up survey. Pre-post analyses of differences in means found significant improvement across several efficacy measures, including confidence starting a conversation about social media (P=.003), confidence contacting the person who posted something concerning (P<.001), and confidence recommending support services to youth who view (P=.001) or youth who post concerning messages (P<.001). Similarly, pre- to 6-month analyses found significant positive improvement across multiple measures, including confidence contacting the youth who posted (P<.001), confidence starting a conversation about social media with youth (P=.003), and an increase in the number of experiences recommending resources for youth who viewed concerning social media posts (P=.02). Of the 3 steps of the VCP, the least followed step in coached role-plays was sharing tools and resources, which is a part of the third Plan and Act step. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that the Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media training is a promising tool to prepare adults to intervene and complete the VCP. Additional evaluation with a larger cohort of participants is needed to determine the unique impact of the role-play scenario and changes in mental health referral rates, behaviors, and skills. JMIR Publications 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6997927/ /pubmed/31958066 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14949 Text en ©Bradley Kerr, David Stephens, Daniel Pham, Thomas Ghost Dog, Celena McCray, Colbie Caughlan, Amanda Gaston, Jesse Gritton, Marina Jenkins, Stephanie Craig Rushing, Megan A Moreno. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 20.01.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kerr, Bradley
Stephens, David
Pham, Daniel
Ghost Dog, Thomas
McCray, Celena
Caughlan, Colbie
Gaston, Amanda
Gritton, Jesse
Jenkins, Marina
Craig Rushing, Stephanie
Moreno, Megan A
Assessing the Usability, Appeal, and Impact of a Web-Based Training for Adults Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media: Pilot Suicide Prevention Study
title Assessing the Usability, Appeal, and Impact of a Web-Based Training for Adults Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media: Pilot Suicide Prevention Study
title_full Assessing the Usability, Appeal, and Impact of a Web-Based Training for Adults Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media: Pilot Suicide Prevention Study
title_fullStr Assessing the Usability, Appeal, and Impact of a Web-Based Training for Adults Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media: Pilot Suicide Prevention Study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Usability, Appeal, and Impact of a Web-Based Training for Adults Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media: Pilot Suicide Prevention Study
title_short Assessing the Usability, Appeal, and Impact of a Web-Based Training for Adults Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media: Pilot Suicide Prevention Study
title_sort assessing the usability, appeal, and impact of a web-based training for adults responding to concerning posts on social media: pilot suicide prevention study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6997927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31958066
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14949
work_keys_str_mv AT kerrbradley assessingtheusabilityappealandimpactofawebbasedtrainingforadultsrespondingtoconcerningpostsonsocialmediapilotsuicidepreventionstudy
AT stephensdavid assessingtheusabilityappealandimpactofawebbasedtrainingforadultsrespondingtoconcerningpostsonsocialmediapilotsuicidepreventionstudy
AT phamdaniel assessingtheusabilityappealandimpactofawebbasedtrainingforadultsrespondingtoconcerningpostsonsocialmediapilotsuicidepreventionstudy
AT ghostdogthomas assessingtheusabilityappealandimpactofawebbasedtrainingforadultsrespondingtoconcerningpostsonsocialmediapilotsuicidepreventionstudy
AT mccraycelena assessingtheusabilityappealandimpactofawebbasedtrainingforadultsrespondingtoconcerningpostsonsocialmediapilotsuicidepreventionstudy
AT caughlancolbie assessingtheusabilityappealandimpactofawebbasedtrainingforadultsrespondingtoconcerningpostsonsocialmediapilotsuicidepreventionstudy
AT gastonamanda assessingtheusabilityappealandimpactofawebbasedtrainingforadultsrespondingtoconcerningpostsonsocialmediapilotsuicidepreventionstudy
AT grittonjesse assessingtheusabilityappealandimpactofawebbasedtrainingforadultsrespondingtoconcerningpostsonsocialmediapilotsuicidepreventionstudy
AT jenkinsmarina assessingtheusabilityappealandimpactofawebbasedtrainingforadultsrespondingtoconcerningpostsonsocialmediapilotsuicidepreventionstudy
AT craigrushingstephanie assessingtheusabilityappealandimpactofawebbasedtrainingforadultsrespondingtoconcerningpostsonsocialmediapilotsuicidepreventionstudy
AT morenomegana assessingtheusabilityappealandimpactofawebbasedtrainingforadultsrespondingtoconcerningpostsonsocialmediapilotsuicidepreventionstudy