Cargando…

Misdiagnosis of a twin pregnancy with double-corner uterine rupture following salpingectomy and protrusion of the amniotic sac as an adnexal cyst: a case report

BACKGROUND: Salpingectomy-associated uterine rupture during intrauterine pregnancy is rare in the clinic. We report a case of pregnancy with bilateral rupture of the uterine horns after bilateral salpingectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old woman of Han ethnicity presented with right epigastric p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Jinhua, Cao, Yunfei, Ma, Qiang, Xue, Lili, Zhu, Weiying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32013903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2773-x
_version_ 1783493826952822784
author Dong, Jinhua
Cao, Yunfei
Ma, Qiang
Xue, Lili
Zhu, Weiying
author_facet Dong, Jinhua
Cao, Yunfei
Ma, Qiang
Xue, Lili
Zhu, Weiying
author_sort Dong, Jinhua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Salpingectomy-associated uterine rupture during intrauterine pregnancy is rare in the clinic. We report a case of pregnancy with bilateral rupture of the uterine horns after bilateral salpingectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old woman of Han ethnicity presented with right epigastric pain at 28 weeks and 6 days of gestation. Examination by colour Doppler ultrasound showed the following: “Twin live births with normal foetal umbilical artery blood flow indexes and a 183 mm × 112 mm anechoic zone in the right front of the uterus”. Initially, we made an incorrect judgement wherein we considered the amniotic sac that was protruding into the abdominal cavity to be an adnexal cyst. Fortunately, the diagnosis of uterine rupture was confirmed before the protruded amniotic sac broke. The mother did not bleed much, and the twin foetuses survived in our case. CONCLUSION: A previous history of salpingectomy via laparoscopy could be a risk factor for uterine rupture in pregnant women. Attention should be paid to rare complications of pregnancy. To avoid adverse events, we should pay special attention to women with a history of laparoscopic salpingectomy who complain about abdominal discomfort and offer them a relevant ultrasound examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6998286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69982862020-02-05 Misdiagnosis of a twin pregnancy with double-corner uterine rupture following salpingectomy and protrusion of the amniotic sac as an adnexal cyst: a case report Dong, Jinhua Cao, Yunfei Ma, Qiang Xue, Lili Zhu, Weiying BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Case Report BACKGROUND: Salpingectomy-associated uterine rupture during intrauterine pregnancy is rare in the clinic. We report a case of pregnancy with bilateral rupture of the uterine horns after bilateral salpingectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old woman of Han ethnicity presented with right epigastric pain at 28 weeks and 6 days of gestation. Examination by colour Doppler ultrasound showed the following: “Twin live births with normal foetal umbilical artery blood flow indexes and a 183 mm × 112 mm anechoic zone in the right front of the uterus”. Initially, we made an incorrect judgement wherein we considered the amniotic sac that was protruding into the abdominal cavity to be an adnexal cyst. Fortunately, the diagnosis of uterine rupture was confirmed before the protruded amniotic sac broke. The mother did not bleed much, and the twin foetuses survived in our case. CONCLUSION: A previous history of salpingectomy via laparoscopy could be a risk factor for uterine rupture in pregnant women. Attention should be paid to rare complications of pregnancy. To avoid adverse events, we should pay special attention to women with a history of laparoscopic salpingectomy who complain about abdominal discomfort and offer them a relevant ultrasound examination. BioMed Central 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6998286/ /pubmed/32013903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2773-x Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Dong, Jinhua
Cao, Yunfei
Ma, Qiang
Xue, Lili
Zhu, Weiying
Misdiagnosis of a twin pregnancy with double-corner uterine rupture following salpingectomy and protrusion of the amniotic sac as an adnexal cyst: a case report
title Misdiagnosis of a twin pregnancy with double-corner uterine rupture following salpingectomy and protrusion of the amniotic sac as an adnexal cyst: a case report
title_full Misdiagnosis of a twin pregnancy with double-corner uterine rupture following salpingectomy and protrusion of the amniotic sac as an adnexal cyst: a case report
title_fullStr Misdiagnosis of a twin pregnancy with double-corner uterine rupture following salpingectomy and protrusion of the amniotic sac as an adnexal cyst: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Misdiagnosis of a twin pregnancy with double-corner uterine rupture following salpingectomy and protrusion of the amniotic sac as an adnexal cyst: a case report
title_short Misdiagnosis of a twin pregnancy with double-corner uterine rupture following salpingectomy and protrusion of the amniotic sac as an adnexal cyst: a case report
title_sort misdiagnosis of a twin pregnancy with double-corner uterine rupture following salpingectomy and protrusion of the amniotic sac as an adnexal cyst: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32013903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2773-x
work_keys_str_mv AT dongjinhua misdiagnosisofatwinpregnancywithdoublecorneruterinerupturefollowingsalpingectomyandprotrusionoftheamnioticsacasanadnexalcystacasereport
AT caoyunfei misdiagnosisofatwinpregnancywithdoublecorneruterinerupturefollowingsalpingectomyandprotrusionoftheamnioticsacasanadnexalcystacasereport
AT maqiang misdiagnosisofatwinpregnancywithdoublecorneruterinerupturefollowingsalpingectomyandprotrusionoftheamnioticsacasanadnexalcystacasereport
AT xuelili misdiagnosisofatwinpregnancywithdoublecorneruterinerupturefollowingsalpingectomyandprotrusionoftheamnioticsacasanadnexalcystacasereport
AT zhuweiying misdiagnosisofatwinpregnancywithdoublecorneruterinerupturefollowingsalpingectomyandprotrusionoftheamnioticsacasanadnexalcystacasereport