Cargando…

A systematic review protocol for crime trends facilitated by synthetic biology

BACKGROUND: When new technologies are developed, it is common for their crime and security implications to be overlooked or given inadequate attention, which can lead to a ‘crime harvest’. Potential methods for the criminal exploitation of biotechnology need to be understood to assess their impact,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elgabry, Mariam, Nesbeth, Darren, Johnson, Shane D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32014050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1284-1
_version_ 1783493830758105088
author Elgabry, Mariam
Nesbeth, Darren
Johnson, Shane D.
author_facet Elgabry, Mariam
Nesbeth, Darren
Johnson, Shane D.
author_sort Elgabry, Mariam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When new technologies are developed, it is common for their crime and security implications to be overlooked or given inadequate attention, which can lead to a ‘crime harvest’. Potential methods for the criminal exploitation of biotechnology need to be understood to assess their impact, evaluate current policies and interventions and inform the allocation of limited resources efficiently. Recent studies have illustrated some of the security implications of biotechnology, with outcomes of misuse ranging from compromised computers using malware stored in synthesised DNA, infringement of intellectual property on biological matter, synthesis of new threatening viruses, ‘genetic genocide,’ and the exploitation of food markets with genetically modified crops. However, there exists no synthesis of this information, and no formal quality assessment of the current evidence. This review therefore aims to establish what current and/or predicted crimes have been reported as a result of biotechnology. METHODS: A systematic review will be conducted to identify relevant literature. ProQuest, Web of Science, MEDLINE and USENIX will be searched utilizing a predefined search string, and Backward and Forward searches. Grey literature will be identified by searching the official UK Government website (www.gov.uk) and the Global database of Dissertations and Theses. The review will be conducted by screening title/abstracts followed by full texts, utilising pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Papers will be managed using Eppi-center Reviewer 4 software, and data will be organised using a data extraction table using a descriptive coding tool. A predefined rating system (speculative, experimental or currently occurring) will be used to sort studies, and a thematic synthesis of the results will be presented. DISCUSSION: Despite the concerns raised about the misuse of biotechnology, no previous work has been conducted from a Crime Science perspective to collate and assess the literature. This systematic review aims to identify the types of offending activity facilitated by biotechnology, including synthetic biology and genetic engineering. The objective of the review is to examine whether this offending activity can be prevented by assessing the conditions necessary for the crime events to occur. It is anticipated that evidence generated from this review will guide future research in this area and aid relevant stakeholders to prioritise and allocate limited resources to biotechnology crime prevention. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019131685
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6998311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69983112020-02-05 A systematic review protocol for crime trends facilitated by synthetic biology Elgabry, Mariam Nesbeth, Darren Johnson, Shane D. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: When new technologies are developed, it is common for their crime and security implications to be overlooked or given inadequate attention, which can lead to a ‘crime harvest’. Potential methods for the criminal exploitation of biotechnology need to be understood to assess their impact, evaluate current policies and interventions and inform the allocation of limited resources efficiently. Recent studies have illustrated some of the security implications of biotechnology, with outcomes of misuse ranging from compromised computers using malware stored in synthesised DNA, infringement of intellectual property on biological matter, synthesis of new threatening viruses, ‘genetic genocide,’ and the exploitation of food markets with genetically modified crops. However, there exists no synthesis of this information, and no formal quality assessment of the current evidence. This review therefore aims to establish what current and/or predicted crimes have been reported as a result of biotechnology. METHODS: A systematic review will be conducted to identify relevant literature. ProQuest, Web of Science, MEDLINE and USENIX will be searched utilizing a predefined search string, and Backward and Forward searches. Grey literature will be identified by searching the official UK Government website (www.gov.uk) and the Global database of Dissertations and Theses. The review will be conducted by screening title/abstracts followed by full texts, utilising pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Papers will be managed using Eppi-center Reviewer 4 software, and data will be organised using a data extraction table using a descriptive coding tool. A predefined rating system (speculative, experimental or currently occurring) will be used to sort studies, and a thematic synthesis of the results will be presented. DISCUSSION: Despite the concerns raised about the misuse of biotechnology, no previous work has been conducted from a Crime Science perspective to collate and assess the literature. This systematic review aims to identify the types of offending activity facilitated by biotechnology, including synthetic biology and genetic engineering. The objective of the review is to examine whether this offending activity can be prevented by assessing the conditions necessary for the crime events to occur. It is anticipated that evidence generated from this review will guide future research in this area and aid relevant stakeholders to prioritise and allocate limited resources to biotechnology crime prevention. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019131685 BioMed Central 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6998311/ /pubmed/32014050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1284-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Elgabry, Mariam
Nesbeth, Darren
Johnson, Shane D.
A systematic review protocol for crime trends facilitated by synthetic biology
title A systematic review protocol for crime trends facilitated by synthetic biology
title_full A systematic review protocol for crime trends facilitated by synthetic biology
title_fullStr A systematic review protocol for crime trends facilitated by synthetic biology
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review protocol for crime trends facilitated by synthetic biology
title_short A systematic review protocol for crime trends facilitated by synthetic biology
title_sort systematic review protocol for crime trends facilitated by synthetic biology
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32014050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1284-1
work_keys_str_mv AT elgabrymariam asystematicreviewprotocolforcrimetrendsfacilitatedbysyntheticbiology
AT nesbethdarren asystematicreviewprotocolforcrimetrendsfacilitatedbysyntheticbiology
AT johnsonshaned asystematicreviewprotocolforcrimetrendsfacilitatedbysyntheticbiology
AT elgabrymariam systematicreviewprotocolforcrimetrendsfacilitatedbysyntheticbiology
AT nesbethdarren systematicreviewprotocolforcrimetrendsfacilitatedbysyntheticbiology
AT johnsonshaned systematicreviewprotocolforcrimetrendsfacilitatedbysyntheticbiology