Cargando…

Anal function and quality of life analysis after laparoscopic modified Parks for ultra-low rectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND: To assess postoperative anal function and quality of life of ultra-low rectal cancer patients treated by laparoscopic modified Parks surgery. METHODS: From February 2017 to March 2019, 114 patients with ultra-low rectal cancer above T2 were treated respectively with ultra-low anterior re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Haibo, Li, Jian, Chen, Yuxiang, Yang, Zhi, Peng, Zha, Liao, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32013992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-1801-7
_version_ 1783493830995083264
author Ding, Haibo
Li, Jian
Chen, Yuxiang
Yang, Zhi
Peng, Zha
Liao, Xin
author_facet Ding, Haibo
Li, Jian
Chen, Yuxiang
Yang, Zhi
Peng, Zha
Liao, Xin
author_sort Ding, Haibo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess postoperative anal function and quality of life of ultra-low rectal cancer patients treated by laparoscopic modified Parks surgery. METHODS: From February 2017 to March 2019, 114 patients with ultra-low rectal cancer above T2 were treated respectively with ultra-low anterior resection (Dixon), modified coloanal anastomosis (modified Parks), and Miles according to the preoperative stage and anastomotic position. The postoperative anal function and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) of each patient were collected and synthetically analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with the Dixon group, the postoperative anal function and FIQL in the Parks group were poor at the early stage. However, from 6 to 12 months after surgery, the scores of anal function and FIQL in the Parks group were similar to those in the Dixon group (P > 0.05). Compared with the Miles group, the FIQL of the two groups were similar in the early postoperative stage. However, with the passage of time, from 3 to 9 months after surgery, the four domains of FIQL in the Parks group were higher than those in the Miles group successively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic modified Parks is a safe, effective, and economical anus-preserving surgery. Although its early anal function and FIQL were poor, it could gradually recover to the similar level as Dixon. Moreover, it can save the anus and obtain a better postoperative quality of life for some patients who previously could only undergo Miles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6998312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69983122020-02-05 Anal function and quality of life analysis after laparoscopic modified Parks for ultra-low rectal cancer patients Ding, Haibo Li, Jian Chen, Yuxiang Yang, Zhi Peng, Zha Liao, Xin World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To assess postoperative anal function and quality of life of ultra-low rectal cancer patients treated by laparoscopic modified Parks surgery. METHODS: From February 2017 to March 2019, 114 patients with ultra-low rectal cancer above T2 were treated respectively with ultra-low anterior resection (Dixon), modified coloanal anastomosis (modified Parks), and Miles according to the preoperative stage and anastomotic position. The postoperative anal function and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) of each patient were collected and synthetically analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with the Dixon group, the postoperative anal function and FIQL in the Parks group were poor at the early stage. However, from 6 to 12 months after surgery, the scores of anal function and FIQL in the Parks group were similar to those in the Dixon group (P > 0.05). Compared with the Miles group, the FIQL of the two groups were similar in the early postoperative stage. However, with the passage of time, from 3 to 9 months after surgery, the four domains of FIQL in the Parks group were higher than those in the Miles group successively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic modified Parks is a safe, effective, and economical anus-preserving surgery. Although its early anal function and FIQL were poor, it could gradually recover to the similar level as Dixon. Moreover, it can save the anus and obtain a better postoperative quality of life for some patients who previously could only undergo Miles. BioMed Central 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6998312/ /pubmed/32013992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-1801-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ding, Haibo
Li, Jian
Chen, Yuxiang
Yang, Zhi
Peng, Zha
Liao, Xin
Anal function and quality of life analysis after laparoscopic modified Parks for ultra-low rectal cancer patients
title Anal function and quality of life analysis after laparoscopic modified Parks for ultra-low rectal cancer patients
title_full Anal function and quality of life analysis after laparoscopic modified Parks for ultra-low rectal cancer patients
title_fullStr Anal function and quality of life analysis after laparoscopic modified Parks for ultra-low rectal cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Anal function and quality of life analysis after laparoscopic modified Parks for ultra-low rectal cancer patients
title_short Anal function and quality of life analysis after laparoscopic modified Parks for ultra-low rectal cancer patients
title_sort anal function and quality of life analysis after laparoscopic modified parks for ultra-low rectal cancer patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32013992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-1801-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dinghaibo analfunctionandqualityoflifeanalysisafterlaparoscopicmodifiedparksforultralowrectalcancerpatients
AT lijian analfunctionandqualityoflifeanalysisafterlaparoscopicmodifiedparksforultralowrectalcancerpatients
AT chenyuxiang analfunctionandqualityoflifeanalysisafterlaparoscopicmodifiedparksforultralowrectalcancerpatients
AT yangzhi analfunctionandqualityoflifeanalysisafterlaparoscopicmodifiedparksforultralowrectalcancerpatients
AT pengzha analfunctionandqualityoflifeanalysisafterlaparoscopicmodifiedparksforultralowrectalcancerpatients
AT liaoxin analfunctionandqualityoflifeanalysisafterlaparoscopicmodifiedparksforultralowrectalcancerpatients