Cargando…

Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks

BACKGROUND: As demonstrated during the global Ebola crisis of 2014–2016, healthcare institutions in high resource settings need support concerning preparedness during threats of infectious disease outbreaks. This study aimed to exploratively develop a standardized preparedness system to use during u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Rooij, Doret, Belfroid, Evelien, Eilers, Renske, Roßkamp, Dorothee, Swaan, Corien, Timen, Aura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5861894
_version_ 1783493882909032448
author de Rooij, Doret
Belfroid, Evelien
Eilers, Renske
Roßkamp, Dorothee
Swaan, Corien
Timen, Aura
author_facet de Rooij, Doret
Belfroid, Evelien
Eilers, Renske
Roßkamp, Dorothee
Swaan, Corien
Timen, Aura
author_sort de Rooij, Doret
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As demonstrated during the global Ebola crisis of 2014–2016, healthcare institutions in high resource settings need support concerning preparedness during threats of infectious disease outbreaks. This study aimed to exploratively develop a standardized preparedness system to use during unfolding threats of severe infectious diseases. METHODS: A qualitative three-step study among infectious disease prevention and control experts was performed. First, interviews (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion ( RESULTS: Four preparedness phases were identified: preparedness phase green is a situation without the presence of the infectious disease threat that requires centralized care, anywhere in the world. Phase yellow is an outbreak in the world with some likelihood of imported cases. Phase orange is a realistic chance of an unexpected case within the country, or unrest developing among population or staff; phase red is cases admitted to hospitals in the country, potentially causing a shortage of resources. Specific preparedness activities included infection prevention, diagnostics, patient care, staff, and communication. Consensus was reached on the need for the development of a preparedness system and national coordination during threats. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we developed a standardized system to support institutional preparedness during an increasing threat. Use of this system by both curative healthcare institutions and the (municipal) public health service, could help to effectively communicate and align preparedness activities during future threats of severe infectious diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6998699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69986992020-02-23 Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks de Rooij, Doret Belfroid, Evelien Eilers, Renske Roßkamp, Dorothee Swaan, Corien Timen, Aura Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: As demonstrated during the global Ebola crisis of 2014–2016, healthcare institutions in high resource settings need support concerning preparedness during threats of infectious disease outbreaks. This study aimed to exploratively develop a standardized preparedness system to use during unfolding threats of severe infectious diseases. METHODS: A qualitative three-step study among infectious disease prevention and control experts was performed. First, interviews (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion ( RESULTS: Four preparedness phases were identified: preparedness phase green is a situation without the presence of the infectious disease threat that requires centralized care, anywhere in the world. Phase yellow is an outbreak in the world with some likelihood of imported cases. Phase orange is a realistic chance of an unexpected case within the country, or unrest developing among population or staff; phase red is cases admitted to hospitals in the country, potentially causing a shortage of resources. Specific preparedness activities included infection prevention, diagnostics, patient care, staff, and communication. Consensus was reached on the need for the development of a preparedness system and national coordination during threats. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we developed a standardized system to support institutional preparedness during an increasing threat. Use of this system by both curative healthcare institutions and the (municipal) public health service, could help to effectively communicate and align preparedness activities during future threats of severe infectious diseases. Hindawi 2020-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6998699/ /pubmed/32090099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5861894 Text en Copyright © 2020 Doret de Rooij et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Rooij, Doret
Belfroid, Evelien
Eilers, Renske
Roßkamp, Dorothee
Swaan, Corien
Timen, Aura
Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks
title Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks
title_full Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks
title_fullStr Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks
title_short Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks
title_sort qualitative research: institutional preparedness during threats of infectious disease outbreaks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5861894
work_keys_str_mv AT derooijdoret qualitativeresearchinstitutionalpreparednessduringthreatsofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT belfroidevelien qualitativeresearchinstitutionalpreparednessduringthreatsofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT eilersrenske qualitativeresearchinstitutionalpreparednessduringthreatsofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT roßkampdorothee qualitativeresearchinstitutionalpreparednessduringthreatsofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT swaancorien qualitativeresearchinstitutionalpreparednessduringthreatsofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks
AT timenaura qualitativeresearchinstitutionalpreparednessduringthreatsofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks