Cargando…
Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks
BACKGROUND: As demonstrated during the global Ebola crisis of 2014–2016, healthcare institutions in high resource settings need support concerning preparedness during threats of infectious disease outbreaks. This study aimed to exploratively develop a standardized preparedness system to use during u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5861894 |
_version_ | 1783493882909032448 |
---|---|
author | de Rooij, Doret Belfroid, Evelien Eilers, Renske Roßkamp, Dorothee Swaan, Corien Timen, Aura |
author_facet | de Rooij, Doret Belfroid, Evelien Eilers, Renske Roßkamp, Dorothee Swaan, Corien Timen, Aura |
author_sort | de Rooij, Doret |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As demonstrated during the global Ebola crisis of 2014–2016, healthcare institutions in high resource settings need support concerning preparedness during threats of infectious disease outbreaks. This study aimed to exploratively develop a standardized preparedness system to use during unfolding threats of severe infectious diseases. METHODS: A qualitative three-step study among infectious disease prevention and control experts was performed. First, interviews (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion ( RESULTS: Four preparedness phases were identified: preparedness phase green is a situation without the presence of the infectious disease threat that requires centralized care, anywhere in the world. Phase yellow is an outbreak in the world with some likelihood of imported cases. Phase orange is a realistic chance of an unexpected case within the country, or unrest developing among population or staff; phase red is cases admitted to hospitals in the country, potentially causing a shortage of resources. Specific preparedness activities included infection prevention, diagnostics, patient care, staff, and communication. Consensus was reached on the need for the development of a preparedness system and national coordination during threats. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we developed a standardized system to support institutional preparedness during an increasing threat. Use of this system by both curative healthcare institutions and the (municipal) public health service, could help to effectively communicate and align preparedness activities during future threats of severe infectious diseases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6998699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69986992020-02-23 Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks de Rooij, Doret Belfroid, Evelien Eilers, Renske Roßkamp, Dorothee Swaan, Corien Timen, Aura Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: As demonstrated during the global Ebola crisis of 2014–2016, healthcare institutions in high resource settings need support concerning preparedness during threats of infectious disease outbreaks. This study aimed to exploratively develop a standardized preparedness system to use during unfolding threats of severe infectious diseases. METHODS: A qualitative three-step study among infectious disease prevention and control experts was performed. First, interviews (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion (n = 5) were conducted to identify which factors trigger preparedness activities during an unfolding threat. Second, these triggers informed the design of a phased preparedness system which was tested in a focus group discussion ( RESULTS: Four preparedness phases were identified: preparedness phase green is a situation without the presence of the infectious disease threat that requires centralized care, anywhere in the world. Phase yellow is an outbreak in the world with some likelihood of imported cases. Phase orange is a realistic chance of an unexpected case within the country, or unrest developing among population or staff; phase red is cases admitted to hospitals in the country, potentially causing a shortage of resources. Specific preparedness activities included infection prevention, diagnostics, patient care, staff, and communication. Consensus was reached on the need for the development of a preparedness system and national coordination during threats. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we developed a standardized system to support institutional preparedness during an increasing threat. Use of this system by both curative healthcare institutions and the (municipal) public health service, could help to effectively communicate and align preparedness activities during future threats of severe infectious diseases. Hindawi 2020-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6998699/ /pubmed/32090099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5861894 Text en Copyright © 2020 Doret de Rooij et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Rooij, Doret Belfroid, Evelien Eilers, Renske Roßkamp, Dorothee Swaan, Corien Timen, Aura Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks |
title | Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks |
title_full | Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks |
title_fullStr | Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks |
title_short | Qualitative Research: Institutional Preparedness During Threats of Infectious Disease Outbreaks |
title_sort | qualitative research: institutional preparedness during threats of infectious disease outbreaks |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5861894 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derooijdoret qualitativeresearchinstitutionalpreparednessduringthreatsofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks AT belfroidevelien qualitativeresearchinstitutionalpreparednessduringthreatsofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks AT eilersrenske qualitativeresearchinstitutionalpreparednessduringthreatsofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks AT roßkampdorothee qualitativeresearchinstitutionalpreparednessduringthreatsofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks AT swaancorien qualitativeresearchinstitutionalpreparednessduringthreatsofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks AT timenaura qualitativeresearchinstitutionalpreparednessduringthreatsofinfectiousdiseaseoutbreaks |