Cargando…

Insights in the anode chamber influences on cathodic bioelectromethanogenesis – systematic comparison of anode materials and anolytes

Cathode and catholyte are usually optimized to improve microbial electrosynthesis process, whereas the anodic counter reaction was not systematically investigated and optimized for these applications yet. Nevertheless, the anolyte and especially the anode material can limit the cathodic bioelectroch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Enzmann, Franziska, Stöckl, Markus, Gronemeier, Denise, Holtmann, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32624972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201900126
_version_ 1783493942370631680
author Enzmann, Franziska
Stöckl, Markus
Gronemeier, Denise
Holtmann, Dirk
author_facet Enzmann, Franziska
Stöckl, Markus
Gronemeier, Denise
Holtmann, Dirk
author_sort Enzmann, Franziska
collection PubMed
description Cathode and catholyte are usually optimized to improve microbial electrosynthesis process, whereas the anodic counter reaction was not systematically investigated and optimized for these applications yet. Nevertheless, the anolyte and especially the anode material can limit the cathodic bioelectrochemical process. This paper compares for the first time the performance of different anode materials as counter electrodes for a cathodic bioelectrochemical process, the bioelectromethanogenesis. It was observed that depending on the anode material the cathodic methane production varies from 0.96 µmol/d with a carbon fabric anode to 25.44 µmol/d with a carbon felt anode of the same geometrical surface area. The used anolyte also affected the methane production rate at the cathode. Especially, the pH of the anolyte showed an impact on the system; an anolyte with pH 5 produced up to 2.0 times more methane compared to one with pH 8.5. The proton availability is discussed as one reason for this effect. Although some of the measured effects cannot be explained completely so far this study advises researchers to strongly consider the anode impact during process development and optimization of a cathodic bioelectrochemical synthesis process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6999415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69994152020-07-02 Insights in the anode chamber influences on cathodic bioelectromethanogenesis – systematic comparison of anode materials and anolytes Enzmann, Franziska Stöckl, Markus Gronemeier, Denise Holtmann, Dirk Eng Life Sci Research Articles Cathode and catholyte are usually optimized to improve microbial electrosynthesis process, whereas the anodic counter reaction was not systematically investigated and optimized for these applications yet. Nevertheless, the anolyte and especially the anode material can limit the cathodic bioelectrochemical process. This paper compares for the first time the performance of different anode materials as counter electrodes for a cathodic bioelectrochemical process, the bioelectromethanogenesis. It was observed that depending on the anode material the cathodic methane production varies from 0.96 µmol/d with a carbon fabric anode to 25.44 µmol/d with a carbon felt anode of the same geometrical surface area. The used anolyte also affected the methane production rate at the cathode. Especially, the pH of the anolyte showed an impact on the system; an anolyte with pH 5 produced up to 2.0 times more methane compared to one with pH 8.5. The proton availability is discussed as one reason for this effect. Although some of the measured effects cannot be explained completely so far this study advises researchers to strongly consider the anode impact during process development and optimization of a cathodic bioelectrochemical synthesis process. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6999415/ /pubmed/32624972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201900126 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Engineering in Life Sciences published by Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Enzmann, Franziska
Stöckl, Markus
Gronemeier, Denise
Holtmann, Dirk
Insights in the anode chamber influences on cathodic bioelectromethanogenesis – systematic comparison of anode materials and anolytes
title Insights in the anode chamber influences on cathodic bioelectromethanogenesis – systematic comparison of anode materials and anolytes
title_full Insights in the anode chamber influences on cathodic bioelectromethanogenesis – systematic comparison of anode materials and anolytes
title_fullStr Insights in the anode chamber influences on cathodic bioelectromethanogenesis – systematic comparison of anode materials and anolytes
title_full_unstemmed Insights in the anode chamber influences on cathodic bioelectromethanogenesis – systematic comparison of anode materials and anolytes
title_short Insights in the anode chamber influences on cathodic bioelectromethanogenesis – systematic comparison of anode materials and anolytes
title_sort insights in the anode chamber influences on cathodic bioelectromethanogenesis – systematic comparison of anode materials and anolytes
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32624972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201900126
work_keys_str_mv AT enzmannfranziska insightsintheanodechamberinfluencesoncathodicbioelectromethanogenesissystematiccomparisonofanodematerialsandanolytes
AT stocklmarkus insightsintheanodechamberinfluencesoncathodicbioelectromethanogenesissystematiccomparisonofanodematerialsandanolytes
AT gronemeierdenise insightsintheanodechamberinfluencesoncathodicbioelectromethanogenesissystematiccomparisonofanodematerialsandanolytes
AT holtmanndirk insightsintheanodechamberinfluencesoncathodicbioelectromethanogenesissystematiccomparisonofanodematerialsandanolytes