Cargando…
Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography
INTRODUCTION: Stent underexpansion is a predictor of in-stent-restenosis and stent thrombosis. Semi-compliant balloons (SCBs) are generally used for lesion preparation. It remains unknown whether routine predilatation using non-compliant balloons (NCBs) improves stent expansion in ordinary coronary...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001204 |
_version_ | 1783493953118535680 |
---|---|
author | Cuculi, Florim Bossard, Matthias Zasada, Wojciech Moccetti, Federico Voskuil, Michiel Wolfrum, Mathias Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr Toggweiler, Stefan Kobza, Richard |
author_facet | Cuculi, Florim Bossard, Matthias Zasada, Wojciech Moccetti, Federico Voskuil, Michiel Wolfrum, Mathias Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr Toggweiler, Stefan Kobza, Richard |
author_sort | Cuculi, Florim |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Stent underexpansion is a predictor of in-stent-restenosis and stent thrombosis. Semi-compliant balloons (SCBs) are generally used for lesion preparation. It remains unknown whether routine predilatation using non-compliant balloons (NCBs) improves stent expansion in ordinary coronary lesions. METHODS: The PREdilatation by high-pressure NC balloon catheter for better vessel preparation and Optimal lesion preparation with non-compliant balloons for the implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds studies randomised patients presenting with stable coronary artery disease or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction requiring stent implantation to lesion preparation using NCBs versus SCBs. Stent expansion index (SEI-minimal luminal area/mean luminal area on optical coherence tomography) and periprocedural complications were compared. RESULTS: We enrolled 104 patients: 53 patients (54 lesions) vs 51 patients (56 lesions) to the NCB and SCB groups, respectively. Predilatation pressure was higher in the NCB group (24±7 atmospheres (atm) vs 14±3 atm, p<0.0001). Postdilatation using NCBs was performed in 41 (76%) lesions vs 46 (82%) lesions pretreated with NCBs versus SCBs (p=0.57). Similar pressures were used for postdilatation with NCB in both groups (23±8 atm vs 23±9 atm, p=0.65). SEI after stent implantation was 0.88±0.13 in the NCB vs 0.85±0.14 in the SCB group (p=0.18). After postdilatation, SEI increased to 0.94±0.13 in the NCB group vs 0.88±0.13 in the SCB group (p=0.02). No relevant complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In simple coronary lesions, predilatation/postdilatation with NCBs at high pressures appears to result in better scaffold and stent expansion. Using SCBs only for predilatation might lead to inadequate stent expansion and postdilatation with NCBs might only partially correct this. Predilatation and postdilatation using NCBs at high pressure is safe. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03518645. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6999685 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69996852020-02-19 Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography Cuculi, Florim Bossard, Matthias Zasada, Wojciech Moccetti, Federico Voskuil, Michiel Wolfrum, Mathias Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr Toggweiler, Stefan Kobza, Richard Open Heart Interventional Cardiology INTRODUCTION: Stent underexpansion is a predictor of in-stent-restenosis and stent thrombosis. Semi-compliant balloons (SCBs) are generally used for lesion preparation. It remains unknown whether routine predilatation using non-compliant balloons (NCBs) improves stent expansion in ordinary coronary lesions. METHODS: The PREdilatation by high-pressure NC balloon catheter for better vessel preparation and Optimal lesion preparation with non-compliant balloons for the implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds studies randomised patients presenting with stable coronary artery disease or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction requiring stent implantation to lesion preparation using NCBs versus SCBs. Stent expansion index (SEI-minimal luminal area/mean luminal area on optical coherence tomography) and periprocedural complications were compared. RESULTS: We enrolled 104 patients: 53 patients (54 lesions) vs 51 patients (56 lesions) to the NCB and SCB groups, respectively. Predilatation pressure was higher in the NCB group (24±7 atmospheres (atm) vs 14±3 atm, p<0.0001). Postdilatation using NCBs was performed in 41 (76%) lesions vs 46 (82%) lesions pretreated with NCBs versus SCBs (p=0.57). Similar pressures were used for postdilatation with NCB in both groups (23±8 atm vs 23±9 atm, p=0.65). SEI after stent implantation was 0.88±0.13 in the NCB vs 0.85±0.14 in the SCB group (p=0.18). After postdilatation, SEI increased to 0.94±0.13 in the NCB group vs 0.88±0.13 in the SCB group (p=0.02). No relevant complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In simple coronary lesions, predilatation/postdilatation with NCBs at high pressures appears to result in better scaffold and stent expansion. Using SCBs only for predilatation might lead to inadequate stent expansion and postdilatation with NCBs might only partially correct this. Predilatation and postdilatation using NCBs at high pressure is safe. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03518645. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6999685/ /pubmed/32076567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001204 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Interventional Cardiology Cuculi, Florim Bossard, Matthias Zasada, Wojciech Moccetti, Federico Voskuil, Michiel Wolfrum, Mathias Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr Toggweiler, Stefan Kobza, Richard Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography |
title | Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography |
title_full | Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography |
title_fullStr | Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography |
title_short | Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography |
title_sort | performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography |
topic | Interventional Cardiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001204 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cuculiflorim performingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionswithpredilatationusingnoncompliantballoonsathighpressureversusconventionalsemicompliantballoonsinsightsfromtworandomisedstudiesusingopticalcoherencetomography AT bossardmatthias performingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionswithpredilatationusingnoncompliantballoonsathighpressureversusconventionalsemicompliantballoonsinsightsfromtworandomisedstudiesusingopticalcoherencetomography AT zasadawojciech performingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionswithpredilatationusingnoncompliantballoonsathighpressureversusconventionalsemicompliantballoonsinsightsfromtworandomisedstudiesusingopticalcoherencetomography AT moccettifederico performingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionswithpredilatationusingnoncompliantballoonsathighpressureversusconventionalsemicompliantballoonsinsightsfromtworandomisedstudiesusingopticalcoherencetomography AT voskuilmichiel performingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionswithpredilatationusingnoncompliantballoonsathighpressureversusconventionalsemicompliantballoonsinsightsfromtworandomisedstudiesusingopticalcoherencetomography AT wolfrummathias performingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionswithpredilatationusingnoncompliantballoonsathighpressureversusconventionalsemicompliantballoonsinsightsfromtworandomisedstudiesusingopticalcoherencetomography AT malinowskikrzysztofpiotr performingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionswithpredilatationusingnoncompliantballoonsathighpressureversusconventionalsemicompliantballoonsinsightsfromtworandomisedstudiesusingopticalcoherencetomography AT toggweilerstefan performingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionswithpredilatationusingnoncompliantballoonsathighpressureversusconventionalsemicompliantballoonsinsightsfromtworandomisedstudiesusingopticalcoherencetomography AT kobzarichard performingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionswithpredilatationusingnoncompliantballoonsathighpressureversusconventionalsemicompliantballoonsinsightsfromtworandomisedstudiesusingopticalcoherencetomography |