Cargando…

Comparative AAPOS Validation of the Birefringent Amblyopia Screener with Isolated Small-Angle Strabismus

BACKGROUND: The Rebion blinq binocular birefringent ocular alignment screener was recently commercially released, but it did not yet have validation by American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) uniform guidelines. METHODS: Children and adults from a high-risk eye practi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Arnold, Robert W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099317
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S242335
_version_ 1783493964519702528
author Arnold, Robert W
author_facet Arnold, Robert W
author_sort Arnold, Robert W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Rebion blinq binocular birefringent ocular alignment screener was recently commercially released, but it did not yet have validation by American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) uniform guidelines. METHODS: Children and adults from a high-risk eye practice had screening by blinq with validation by AAPOS 2003 guidelines. Then, the blinq was compared to the Adaptica 2WIN with CR corneal reflex strabismus estimation by AAPOS 2003 guidelines plus additional efforts to identify patients with diminished binocularity. RESULTS: Blinq in 100 patients compared to 2003 AAPOS amblyopia risk factors (ARF) had sensitivity 67%, specificity 75% and PPV of 82%. Both blinq and 2WIN were completed by 87 patients median age 6.5 years. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for blinq were 75%, 68% and 81% whereas 2WIN had 91%, 68% and 84%. The blinq referred two young patients with isolated, small-angle strabismic amblyopia that 2WIN refractive function passed. CONCLUSION: Despite its non-refractive design to identify binocular foveation, blinq performed well with refractive and strabismic uniform risk factors and a PPV greater than 80%. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: NCT04195711.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6999781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69997812020-02-25 Comparative AAPOS Validation of the Birefringent Amblyopia Screener with Isolated Small-Angle Strabismus Arnold, Robert W Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: The Rebion blinq binocular birefringent ocular alignment screener was recently commercially released, but it did not yet have validation by American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) uniform guidelines. METHODS: Children and adults from a high-risk eye practice had screening by blinq with validation by AAPOS 2003 guidelines. Then, the blinq was compared to the Adaptica 2WIN with CR corneal reflex strabismus estimation by AAPOS 2003 guidelines plus additional efforts to identify patients with diminished binocularity. RESULTS: Blinq in 100 patients compared to 2003 AAPOS amblyopia risk factors (ARF) had sensitivity 67%, specificity 75% and PPV of 82%. Both blinq and 2WIN were completed by 87 patients median age 6.5 years. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for blinq were 75%, 68% and 81% whereas 2WIN had 91%, 68% and 84%. The blinq referred two young patients with isolated, small-angle strabismic amblyopia that 2WIN refractive function passed. CONCLUSION: Despite its non-refractive design to identify binocular foveation, blinq performed well with refractive and strabismic uniform risk factors and a PPV greater than 80%. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: NCT04195711. Dove 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6999781/ /pubmed/32099317 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S242335 Text en © 2020 Arnold. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Arnold, Robert W
Comparative AAPOS Validation of the Birefringent Amblyopia Screener with Isolated Small-Angle Strabismus
title Comparative AAPOS Validation of the Birefringent Amblyopia Screener with Isolated Small-Angle Strabismus
title_full Comparative AAPOS Validation of the Birefringent Amblyopia Screener with Isolated Small-Angle Strabismus
title_fullStr Comparative AAPOS Validation of the Birefringent Amblyopia Screener with Isolated Small-Angle Strabismus
title_full_unstemmed Comparative AAPOS Validation of the Birefringent Amblyopia Screener with Isolated Small-Angle Strabismus
title_short Comparative AAPOS Validation of the Birefringent Amblyopia Screener with Isolated Small-Angle Strabismus
title_sort comparative aapos validation of the birefringent amblyopia screener with isolated small-angle strabismus
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099317
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S242335
work_keys_str_mv AT arnoldrobertw comparativeaaposvalidationofthebirefringentamblyopiascreenerwithisolatedsmallanglestrabismus