Cargando…

Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models

PURPOSE: Ray propagation visualization and optical performance analysis of four different intraocular lenses (IOLs) METHODS: In this laboratory study, four IOLs with different optical designs were assessed: a monofocal AcrySof IQ SN60WF [Alcon], a diffractive-refractive bifocal AcrySof IQ Restor SN6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Son, Hyeck Soo, Labuz, Grzegorz, Khoramnia, Ramin, Merz, Patrick, Yildirim, Timur M., Auffarth, Gerd U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32017784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228342
_version_ 1783493974127804416
author Son, Hyeck Soo
Labuz, Grzegorz
Khoramnia, Ramin
Merz, Patrick
Yildirim, Timur M.
Auffarth, Gerd U.
author_facet Son, Hyeck Soo
Labuz, Grzegorz
Khoramnia, Ramin
Merz, Patrick
Yildirim, Timur M.
Auffarth, Gerd U.
author_sort Son, Hyeck Soo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Ray propagation visualization and optical performance analysis of four different intraocular lenses (IOLs) METHODS: In this laboratory study, four IOLs with different optical designs were assessed: a monofocal AcrySof IQ SN60WF [Alcon], a diffractive-refractive bifocal AcrySof IQ Restor SN6AD1 [Alcon], a diffractive trifocal AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00 [Alcon], and a diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) Symfony ZXR00 [Johnson&Johnson]. An experimental set-up with a water bath containing 0.01% fluorescein solution and monochromatic green laser light (532 nm) was used to visualize the propagation of light rays. Also, the optical performance of the IOLs was evaluated by measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF) values at a pupil sizes of 3.0 and 4.5 mm on the optical bench OptiSpheric(®) IOL PRO II (Trioptics GmbH, Germany). RESULTS: Both the diffractive-refractive bifocal IOL and the EDOF IOL showed two defined foci for distance and near vision. In the diffractive trifocal IOL, three distinct foci for distance, intermediate, and near vision could be visualized. CONCLUSIONS: The ray propagation visualization technique allows a qualitative assessment and comparison of light energy distribution between different IOL models. The measured Through-Focus Response (TFR) quantitatively confirmed the evaluated ray propagation behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6999873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69998732020-02-18 Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models Son, Hyeck Soo Labuz, Grzegorz Khoramnia, Ramin Merz, Patrick Yildirim, Timur M. Auffarth, Gerd U. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Ray propagation visualization and optical performance analysis of four different intraocular lenses (IOLs) METHODS: In this laboratory study, four IOLs with different optical designs were assessed: a monofocal AcrySof IQ SN60WF [Alcon], a diffractive-refractive bifocal AcrySof IQ Restor SN6AD1 [Alcon], a diffractive trifocal AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00 [Alcon], and a diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) Symfony ZXR00 [Johnson&Johnson]. An experimental set-up with a water bath containing 0.01% fluorescein solution and monochromatic green laser light (532 nm) was used to visualize the propagation of light rays. Also, the optical performance of the IOLs was evaluated by measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF) values at a pupil sizes of 3.0 and 4.5 mm on the optical bench OptiSpheric(®) IOL PRO II (Trioptics GmbH, Germany). RESULTS: Both the diffractive-refractive bifocal IOL and the EDOF IOL showed two defined foci for distance and near vision. In the diffractive trifocal IOL, three distinct foci for distance, intermediate, and near vision could be visualized. CONCLUSIONS: The ray propagation visualization technique allows a qualitative assessment and comparison of light energy distribution between different IOL models. The measured Through-Focus Response (TFR) quantitatively confirmed the evaluated ray propagation behavior. Public Library of Science 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6999873/ /pubmed/32017784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228342 Text en © 2020 Son et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Son, Hyeck Soo
Labuz, Grzegorz
Khoramnia, Ramin
Merz, Patrick
Yildirim, Timur M.
Auffarth, Gerd U.
Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models
title Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models
title_full Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models
title_fullStr Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models
title_full_unstemmed Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models
title_short Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models
title_sort ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32017784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228342
work_keys_str_mv AT sonhyecksoo raypropagationimagingandopticalqualityevaluationofdifferentintraocularlensmodels
AT labuzgrzegorz raypropagationimagingandopticalqualityevaluationofdifferentintraocularlensmodels
AT khoramniaramin raypropagationimagingandopticalqualityevaluationofdifferentintraocularlensmodels
AT merzpatrick raypropagationimagingandopticalqualityevaluationofdifferentintraocularlensmodels
AT yildirimtimurm raypropagationimagingandopticalqualityevaluationofdifferentintraocularlensmodels
AT auffarthgerdu raypropagationimagingandopticalqualityevaluationofdifferentintraocularlensmodels