Cargando…

Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics

Objective  This study evaluates penicillin allergy during pregnancy to estimate the proportion that could benefit from penicillin allergy testing. Study Design  Retrospective cohort study of women with penicillin allergy that delivered from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. Results  Among 6,321...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, Elizabeth, Ramirez, Mildred, Turrentine, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3401801
_version_ 1783494004656046080
author Cook, Elizabeth
Ramirez, Mildred
Turrentine, Mark
author_facet Cook, Elizabeth
Ramirez, Mildred
Turrentine, Mark
author_sort Cook, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description Objective  This study evaluates penicillin allergy during pregnancy to estimate the proportion that could benefit from penicillin allergy testing. Study Design  Retrospective cohort study of women with penicillin allergy that delivered from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. Results  Among 6,321 deliveries, 446 (7%) were identified with penicillin allergy. Nine percent (41/446) had no documentation of allergy severity. Allergies associated with intolerance, low, moderate, or high risk of anaphylaxis were reported in 6% (25/446), 40% (177/446), 32% (142/446), and 14% (61/446), respectively. Nearly 74% (330/446) received an antibiotic either antepartum, at delivery, or within 6 weeks of postpartum. The majority of women, 81% (360/446) (i.e., undocumented reactions, low, or moderate risk of anaphylaxis) would have been eligible for penicillin allergy testing. Greater appropriate utilization of antibiotics occurred in women with a high 80% (39/49) or moderate risk of anaphylaxis 70% (79/112) versus low risk of anaphylaxis 55% (64/117), history of intolerance 40% (8/20), or undocumented reaction 19% (6/32), p  ≤ 0.01. Conclusion  Most women who report a penicillin allergy during pregnancy would be candidates for penicillin allergy testing. With the high rate of antibiotic interventions in pregnant women who report a penicillin allergy, consideration should be given for penicillin allergy assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7000251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70002512020-02-05 Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics Cook, Elizabeth Ramirez, Mildred Turrentine, Mark AJP Rep Objective  This study evaluates penicillin allergy during pregnancy to estimate the proportion that could benefit from penicillin allergy testing. Study Design  Retrospective cohort study of women with penicillin allergy that delivered from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. Results  Among 6,321 deliveries, 446 (7%) were identified with penicillin allergy. Nine percent (41/446) had no documentation of allergy severity. Allergies associated with intolerance, low, moderate, or high risk of anaphylaxis were reported in 6% (25/446), 40% (177/446), 32% (142/446), and 14% (61/446), respectively. Nearly 74% (330/446) received an antibiotic either antepartum, at delivery, or within 6 weeks of postpartum. The majority of women, 81% (360/446) (i.e., undocumented reactions, low, or moderate risk of anaphylaxis) would have been eligible for penicillin allergy testing. Greater appropriate utilization of antibiotics occurred in women with a high 80% (39/49) or moderate risk of anaphylaxis 70% (79/112) versus low risk of anaphylaxis 55% (64/117), history of intolerance 40% (8/20), or undocumented reaction 19% (6/32), p  ≤ 0.01. Conclusion  Most women who report a penicillin allergy during pregnancy would be candidates for penicillin allergy testing. With the high rate of antibiotic interventions in pregnant women who report a penicillin allergy, consideration should be given for penicillin allergy assessment. Thieme Medical Publishers 2020-01 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7000251/ /pubmed/32025345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3401801 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cook, Elizabeth
Ramirez, Mildred
Turrentine, Mark
Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics
title Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics
title_full Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics
title_fullStr Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics
title_full_unstemmed Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics
title_short Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics
title_sort time has come for routine penicillin allergy testing in obstetrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3401801
work_keys_str_mv AT cookelizabeth timehascomeforroutinepenicillinallergytestinginobstetrics
AT ramirezmildred timehascomeforroutinepenicillinallergytestinginobstetrics
AT turrentinemark timehascomeforroutinepenicillinallergytestinginobstetrics