Cargando…
Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics
Objective This study evaluates penicillin allergy during pregnancy to estimate the proportion that could benefit from penicillin allergy testing. Study Design Retrospective cohort study of women with penicillin allergy that delivered from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. Results Among 6,321...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3401801 |
_version_ | 1783494004656046080 |
---|---|
author | Cook, Elizabeth Ramirez, Mildred Turrentine, Mark |
author_facet | Cook, Elizabeth Ramirez, Mildred Turrentine, Mark |
author_sort | Cook, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective This study evaluates penicillin allergy during pregnancy to estimate the proportion that could benefit from penicillin allergy testing. Study Design Retrospective cohort study of women with penicillin allergy that delivered from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. Results Among 6,321 deliveries, 446 (7%) were identified with penicillin allergy. Nine percent (41/446) had no documentation of allergy severity. Allergies associated with intolerance, low, moderate, or high risk of anaphylaxis were reported in 6% (25/446), 40% (177/446), 32% (142/446), and 14% (61/446), respectively. Nearly 74% (330/446) received an antibiotic either antepartum, at delivery, or within 6 weeks of postpartum. The majority of women, 81% (360/446) (i.e., undocumented reactions, low, or moderate risk of anaphylaxis) would have been eligible for penicillin allergy testing. Greater appropriate utilization of antibiotics occurred in women with a high 80% (39/49) or moderate risk of anaphylaxis 70% (79/112) versus low risk of anaphylaxis 55% (64/117), history of intolerance 40% (8/20), or undocumented reaction 19% (6/32), p ≤ 0.01. Conclusion Most women who report a penicillin allergy during pregnancy would be candidates for penicillin allergy testing. With the high rate of antibiotic interventions in pregnant women who report a penicillin allergy, consideration should be given for penicillin allergy assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7000251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70002512020-02-05 Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics Cook, Elizabeth Ramirez, Mildred Turrentine, Mark AJP Rep Objective This study evaluates penicillin allergy during pregnancy to estimate the proportion that could benefit from penicillin allergy testing. Study Design Retrospective cohort study of women with penicillin allergy that delivered from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. Results Among 6,321 deliveries, 446 (7%) were identified with penicillin allergy. Nine percent (41/446) had no documentation of allergy severity. Allergies associated with intolerance, low, moderate, or high risk of anaphylaxis were reported in 6% (25/446), 40% (177/446), 32% (142/446), and 14% (61/446), respectively. Nearly 74% (330/446) received an antibiotic either antepartum, at delivery, or within 6 weeks of postpartum. The majority of women, 81% (360/446) (i.e., undocumented reactions, low, or moderate risk of anaphylaxis) would have been eligible for penicillin allergy testing. Greater appropriate utilization of antibiotics occurred in women with a high 80% (39/49) or moderate risk of anaphylaxis 70% (79/112) versus low risk of anaphylaxis 55% (64/117), history of intolerance 40% (8/20), or undocumented reaction 19% (6/32), p ≤ 0.01. Conclusion Most women who report a penicillin allergy during pregnancy would be candidates for penicillin allergy testing. With the high rate of antibiotic interventions in pregnant women who report a penicillin allergy, consideration should be given for penicillin allergy assessment. Thieme Medical Publishers 2020-01 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7000251/ /pubmed/32025345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3401801 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Cook, Elizabeth Ramirez, Mildred Turrentine, Mark Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics |
title |
Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics
|
title_full |
Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics
|
title_fullStr |
Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics
|
title_short |
Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics
|
title_sort | time has come for routine penicillin allergy testing in obstetrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3401801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cookelizabeth timehascomeforroutinepenicillinallergytestinginobstetrics AT ramirezmildred timehascomeforroutinepenicillinallergytestinginobstetrics AT turrentinemark timehascomeforroutinepenicillinallergytestinginobstetrics |