Cargando…
Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy
Cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniectomy (DC) for trauma is a neurosurgical procedure that aims to restore esthesis, improve cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics, and provide cerebral protection. In turn, this can facilitate neurological rehabilitation and potentially enhance neurological rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32063880 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01357 |
_version_ | 1783494046378885120 |
---|---|
author | Iaccarino, Corrado Kolias, Angelos G. Roumy, Louis-Georges Fountas, Kostas Adeleye, Amos Olufemi |
author_facet | Iaccarino, Corrado Kolias, Angelos G. Roumy, Louis-Georges Fountas, Kostas Adeleye, Amos Olufemi |
author_sort | Iaccarino, Corrado |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniectomy (DC) for trauma is a neurosurgical procedure that aims to restore esthesis, improve cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics, and provide cerebral protection. In turn, this can facilitate neurological rehabilitation and potentially enhance neurological recovery. However, CP can be associated with significant morbidity. Multiple aspects of CP must be considered to optimize its outcomes. Those aspects range from the intricacies of the surgical dissection/reconstruction during the procedure of CP, the types of materials used for the reconstruction, as well as the timing of the CP in relation to the DC. This article is a narrative mini-review that discusses the current evidence base and suggests that no consensus has been reached about several issues, such as an agreement on the best material for use in CP, the appropriate timing of CP after DC, and the optimal management of hydrocephalus in patients who need cranial reconstruction. Moreover, the protocol-driven standards of care for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in high-resource settings are virtually out of reach for low-income countries, including those pertaining to CP. Thus, there is a need to design appropriate prospective studies to provide context-specific solid recommendations regarding this topic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7000464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70004642020-02-14 Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy Iaccarino, Corrado Kolias, Angelos G. Roumy, Louis-Georges Fountas, Kostas Adeleye, Amos Olufemi Front Neurol Neurology Cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniectomy (DC) for trauma is a neurosurgical procedure that aims to restore esthesis, improve cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics, and provide cerebral protection. In turn, this can facilitate neurological rehabilitation and potentially enhance neurological recovery. However, CP can be associated with significant morbidity. Multiple aspects of CP must be considered to optimize its outcomes. Those aspects range from the intricacies of the surgical dissection/reconstruction during the procedure of CP, the types of materials used for the reconstruction, as well as the timing of the CP in relation to the DC. This article is a narrative mini-review that discusses the current evidence base and suggests that no consensus has been reached about several issues, such as an agreement on the best material for use in CP, the appropriate timing of CP after DC, and the optimal management of hydrocephalus in patients who need cranial reconstruction. Moreover, the protocol-driven standards of care for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in high-resource settings are virtually out of reach for low-income countries, including those pertaining to CP. Thus, there is a need to design appropriate prospective studies to provide context-specific solid recommendations regarding this topic. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7000464/ /pubmed/32063880 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01357 Text en Copyright © 2020 Iaccarino, Kolias, Roumy, Fountas and Adeleye. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Iaccarino, Corrado Kolias, Angelos G. Roumy, Louis-Georges Fountas, Kostas Adeleye, Amos Olufemi Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy |
title | Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy |
title_full | Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy |
title_fullStr | Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy |
title_short | Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy |
title_sort | cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32063880 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01357 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iaccarinocorrado cranioplastyfollowingdecompressivecraniectomy AT koliasangelosg cranioplastyfollowingdecompressivecraniectomy AT roumylouisgeorges cranioplastyfollowingdecompressivecraniectomy AT fountaskostas cranioplastyfollowingdecompressivecraniectomy AT adeleyeamosolufemi cranioplastyfollowingdecompressivecraniectomy |