Cargando…

Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism?

When the upper half of one face (‘target region’) is spatially aligned with the lower half of another (‘distractor region’), the two halves appear to fuse together perceptually, changing observers’ subjective perception of the target region. This ‘composite face illusion’ is regarded as a key hallma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gray, Katie L. H., Guillemin, Yvonne, Cenac, Zarus, Gibbons, Sophie, Vestner, Tim, Cook, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823299
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01684-9
_version_ 1783494064473112576
author Gray, Katie L. H.
Guillemin, Yvonne
Cenac, Zarus
Gibbons, Sophie
Vestner, Tim
Cook, Richard
author_facet Gray, Katie L. H.
Guillemin, Yvonne
Cenac, Zarus
Gibbons, Sophie
Vestner, Tim
Cook, Richard
author_sort Gray, Katie L. H.
collection PubMed
description When the upper half of one face (‘target region’) is spatially aligned with the lower half of another (‘distractor region’), the two halves appear to fuse together perceptually, changing observers’ subjective perception of the target region. This ‘composite face illusion’ is regarded as a key hallmark of holistic face processing. Importantly, distractor regions bias observers’ subjective perception of target regions in systematic, predictable ways. For example, male and female distractor regions make target regions appear masculine and feminine; young and old distractor regions make target regions appear younger and older. In the present study, we first describe a novel psychophysical paradigm that yields precise reliable estimates of these perceptual biases. Next, we use this novel procedure to establish a clear relationship between observers’ susceptibility to the age and gender biases induced by the composite face illusion. This relationship is seen in a lab-based sample (N = 100) and is replicated in an independent sample tested online (N = 121). Our findings suggest that age and gender variants of the composite illusion may be different measures of a common structural binding process, with an origin early in the face-processing stream. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-019-01684-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7000539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70005392020-02-21 Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism? Gray, Katie L. H. Guillemin, Yvonne Cenac, Zarus Gibbons, Sophie Vestner, Tim Cook, Richard Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report When the upper half of one face (‘target region’) is spatially aligned with the lower half of another (‘distractor region’), the two halves appear to fuse together perceptually, changing observers’ subjective perception of the target region. This ‘composite face illusion’ is regarded as a key hallmark of holistic face processing. Importantly, distractor regions bias observers’ subjective perception of target regions in systematic, predictable ways. For example, male and female distractor regions make target regions appear masculine and feminine; young and old distractor regions make target regions appear younger and older. In the present study, we first describe a novel psychophysical paradigm that yields precise reliable estimates of these perceptual biases. Next, we use this novel procedure to establish a clear relationship between observers’ susceptibility to the age and gender biases induced by the composite face illusion. This relationship is seen in a lab-based sample (N = 100) and is replicated in an independent sample tested online (N = 121). Our findings suggest that age and gender variants of the composite illusion may be different measures of a common structural binding process, with an origin early in the face-processing stream. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-019-01684-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-12-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7000539/ /pubmed/31823299 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01684-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Gray, Katie L. H.
Guillemin, Yvonne
Cenac, Zarus
Gibbons, Sophie
Vestner, Tim
Cook, Richard
Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism?
title Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism?
title_full Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism?
title_fullStr Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism?
title_full_unstemmed Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism?
title_short Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism?
title_sort are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism?
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823299
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01684-9
work_keys_str_mv AT graykatielh arethefacialgenderandfacialagevariantsofthecompositefaceillusionproductsofacommonmechanism
AT guilleminyvonne arethefacialgenderandfacialagevariantsofthecompositefaceillusionproductsofacommonmechanism
AT cenaczarus arethefacialgenderandfacialagevariantsofthecompositefaceillusionproductsofacommonmechanism
AT gibbonssophie arethefacialgenderandfacialagevariantsofthecompositefaceillusionproductsofacommonmechanism
AT vestnertim arethefacialgenderandfacialagevariantsofthecompositefaceillusionproductsofacommonmechanism
AT cookrichard arethefacialgenderandfacialagevariantsofthecompositefaceillusionproductsofacommonmechanism