Cargando…
Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism?
When the upper half of one face (‘target region’) is spatially aligned with the lower half of another (‘distractor region’), the two halves appear to fuse together perceptually, changing observers’ subjective perception of the target region. This ‘composite face illusion’ is regarded as a key hallma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823299 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01684-9 |
_version_ | 1783494064473112576 |
---|---|
author | Gray, Katie L. H. Guillemin, Yvonne Cenac, Zarus Gibbons, Sophie Vestner, Tim Cook, Richard |
author_facet | Gray, Katie L. H. Guillemin, Yvonne Cenac, Zarus Gibbons, Sophie Vestner, Tim Cook, Richard |
author_sort | Gray, Katie L. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | When the upper half of one face (‘target region’) is spatially aligned with the lower half of another (‘distractor region’), the two halves appear to fuse together perceptually, changing observers’ subjective perception of the target region. This ‘composite face illusion’ is regarded as a key hallmark of holistic face processing. Importantly, distractor regions bias observers’ subjective perception of target regions in systematic, predictable ways. For example, male and female distractor regions make target regions appear masculine and feminine; young and old distractor regions make target regions appear younger and older. In the present study, we first describe a novel psychophysical paradigm that yields precise reliable estimates of these perceptual biases. Next, we use this novel procedure to establish a clear relationship between observers’ susceptibility to the age and gender biases induced by the composite face illusion. This relationship is seen in a lab-based sample (N = 100) and is replicated in an independent sample tested online (N = 121). Our findings suggest that age and gender variants of the composite illusion may be different measures of a common structural binding process, with an origin early in the face-processing stream. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-019-01684-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7000539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70005392020-02-21 Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism? Gray, Katie L. H. Guillemin, Yvonne Cenac, Zarus Gibbons, Sophie Vestner, Tim Cook, Richard Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report When the upper half of one face (‘target region’) is spatially aligned with the lower half of another (‘distractor region’), the two halves appear to fuse together perceptually, changing observers’ subjective perception of the target region. This ‘composite face illusion’ is regarded as a key hallmark of holistic face processing. Importantly, distractor regions bias observers’ subjective perception of target regions in systematic, predictable ways. For example, male and female distractor regions make target regions appear masculine and feminine; young and old distractor regions make target regions appear younger and older. In the present study, we first describe a novel psychophysical paradigm that yields precise reliable estimates of these perceptual biases. Next, we use this novel procedure to establish a clear relationship between observers’ susceptibility to the age and gender biases induced by the composite face illusion. This relationship is seen in a lab-based sample (N = 100) and is replicated in an independent sample tested online (N = 121). Our findings suggest that age and gender variants of the composite illusion may be different measures of a common structural binding process, with an origin early in the face-processing stream. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-019-01684-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-12-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7000539/ /pubmed/31823299 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01684-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Gray, Katie L. H. Guillemin, Yvonne Cenac, Zarus Gibbons, Sophie Vestner, Tim Cook, Richard Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism? |
title | Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism? |
title_full | Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism? |
title_fullStr | Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism? |
title_short | Are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism? |
title_sort | are the facial gender and facial age variants of the composite face illusion products of a common mechanism? |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823299 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01684-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT graykatielh arethefacialgenderandfacialagevariantsofthecompositefaceillusionproductsofacommonmechanism AT guilleminyvonne arethefacialgenderandfacialagevariantsofthecompositefaceillusionproductsofacommonmechanism AT cenaczarus arethefacialgenderandfacialagevariantsofthecompositefaceillusionproductsofacommonmechanism AT gibbonssophie arethefacialgenderandfacialagevariantsofthecompositefaceillusionproductsofacommonmechanism AT vestnertim arethefacialgenderandfacialagevariantsofthecompositefaceillusionproductsofacommonmechanism AT cookrichard arethefacialgenderandfacialagevariantsofthecompositefaceillusionproductsofacommonmechanism |