Cargando…

Group (“Project Life Force”) versus individual suicide safety planning: A randomized clinical trial

One in five suicide deaths is a Veteran and in spite of enhanced suicide prevention services in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), twenty Veterans die by suicide each day. One component of the VHA's coordinated effort to treat high-risk suicidal Veterans, and diminish suicide risk, is th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodman, Marianne, Brown, Gregory K., Galfalvy, Hanga C., Spears, Angela Page, Sullivan, Sarah R., Kapil-Pair, Kalpana Nidhi, Jager-Hyman, Shari, Dixon, Lisa, Thase, Michael E., Stanley, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100520
_version_ 1783494110830657536
author Goodman, Marianne
Brown, Gregory K.
Galfalvy, Hanga C.
Spears, Angela Page
Sullivan, Sarah R.
Kapil-Pair, Kalpana Nidhi
Jager-Hyman, Shari
Dixon, Lisa
Thase, Michael E.
Stanley, Barbara
author_facet Goodman, Marianne
Brown, Gregory K.
Galfalvy, Hanga C.
Spears, Angela Page
Sullivan, Sarah R.
Kapil-Pair, Kalpana Nidhi
Jager-Hyman, Shari
Dixon, Lisa
Thase, Michael E.
Stanley, Barbara
author_sort Goodman, Marianne
collection PubMed
description One in five suicide deaths is a Veteran and in spite of enhanced suicide prevention services in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), twenty Veterans die by suicide each day. One component of the VHA's coordinated effort to treat high-risk suicidal Veterans, and diminish suicide risk, is the use of the safety plan. The current study aims to examine a novel intervention integrating skills training and social support with safety planning for Veterans at high-risk for suicide, “Project Life Force” (PLF). A randomized clinical trial (RCT) will be conducted examining if Veterans who are at high-risk for suicide will benefit from the novel group intervention, PLF, compared to Veterans who receive treatment as usual (TAU). We plan to randomize 265 Veterans over the course of the study. The primary outcome variable is the incidence of suicidal behavior, during follow-up, established using a rigorous, multi-method assessment. Secondary outcomes include depression, hopelessness, suicide coping and treatment utilization. Exploratory analyses include safety plan quality and belongingness for those in both arms as well as group cohesion for those in the PLF intervention. Strengths and limitations of this protocol are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7000793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70007932020-02-10 Group (“Project Life Force”) versus individual suicide safety planning: A randomized clinical trial Goodman, Marianne Brown, Gregory K. Galfalvy, Hanga C. Spears, Angela Page Sullivan, Sarah R. Kapil-Pair, Kalpana Nidhi Jager-Hyman, Shari Dixon, Lisa Thase, Michael E. Stanley, Barbara Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article One in five suicide deaths is a Veteran and in spite of enhanced suicide prevention services in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), twenty Veterans die by suicide each day. One component of the VHA's coordinated effort to treat high-risk suicidal Veterans, and diminish suicide risk, is the use of the safety plan. The current study aims to examine a novel intervention integrating skills training and social support with safety planning for Veterans at high-risk for suicide, “Project Life Force” (PLF). A randomized clinical trial (RCT) will be conducted examining if Veterans who are at high-risk for suicide will benefit from the novel group intervention, PLF, compared to Veterans who receive treatment as usual (TAU). We plan to randomize 265 Veterans over the course of the study. The primary outcome variable is the incidence of suicidal behavior, during follow-up, established using a rigorous, multi-method assessment. Secondary outcomes include depression, hopelessness, suicide coping and treatment utilization. Exploratory analyses include safety plan quality and belongingness for those in both arms as well as group cohesion for those in the PLF intervention. Strengths and limitations of this protocol are discussed. Elsevier 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7000793/ /pubmed/32043013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100520 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Goodman, Marianne
Brown, Gregory K.
Galfalvy, Hanga C.
Spears, Angela Page
Sullivan, Sarah R.
Kapil-Pair, Kalpana Nidhi
Jager-Hyman, Shari
Dixon, Lisa
Thase, Michael E.
Stanley, Barbara
Group (“Project Life Force”) versus individual suicide safety planning: A randomized clinical trial
title Group (“Project Life Force”) versus individual suicide safety planning: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Group (“Project Life Force”) versus individual suicide safety planning: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Group (“Project Life Force”) versus individual suicide safety planning: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Group (“Project Life Force”) versus individual suicide safety planning: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Group (“Project Life Force”) versus individual suicide safety planning: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort group (“project life force”) versus individual suicide safety planning: a randomized clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100520
work_keys_str_mv AT goodmanmarianne groupprojectlifeforceversusindividualsuicidesafetyplanningarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT browngregoryk groupprojectlifeforceversusindividualsuicidesafetyplanningarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT galfalvyhangac groupprojectlifeforceversusindividualsuicidesafetyplanningarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT spearsangelapage groupprojectlifeforceversusindividualsuicidesafetyplanningarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sullivansarahr groupprojectlifeforceversusindividualsuicidesafetyplanningarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kapilpairkalpananidhi groupprojectlifeforceversusindividualsuicidesafetyplanningarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jagerhymanshari groupprojectlifeforceversusindividualsuicidesafetyplanningarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dixonlisa groupprojectlifeforceversusindividualsuicidesafetyplanningarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT thasemichaele groupprojectlifeforceversusindividualsuicidesafetyplanningarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT stanleybarbara groupprojectlifeforceversusindividualsuicidesafetyplanningarandomizedclinicaltrial